Skip to main content

Item Sampling, Guessing, Partial Information and Decision-Making in Achievement Testing

  • Chapter
Mathematical Psychology in Progress

Part of the book series: Recent Research in Psychology ((PSYCHOLOGY))

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of determining the number of items in a test and the cutting score to make a binary decision on mastery with prescribed precision. Previous attempts to solve this problem have been based on simplistic models assuming all-or-none knowledge. The same approach as in those papers is adopted here, but from the standpoint of a finite state model of test behaviour. The required number of items is shown to be smaller than previous results suggested. In contrast with previous attempts, this method is applied to true-false and multiple-choice tests responded to in the conventional mode, and to multiple-choice tests responded to in answer-until-correct and Coombs’ modes. The effects of varying guessing behaviour on the part of the examinees are also studied. It is shown that the smallest number of items needed to make a mastery decision with a predetermined error rate occurs when the testees respond without guessing. This behaviour is unlikely to be followed by examinees, but it is also shown that this lower limit can be reached at by administering multiple-choice tests under Coombs’ response mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bliss, L.B. (1980). A test of Lord’s assumptions regarding examinee guessing behavior on multiple-choice tests using elementary school children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink, W.P., & Koele, P. (1980). Item sampling, guessing and decision-making in achievement testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C.H. (1953). On the use of objective examinations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 308–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C.H., Milholland, J.E., & Womer, F.B. (1956). The assessment of partial information. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, L.H., & Frary, R.B. (1977). An empirical test of Lord’s theoretical results regarding formula scoring of multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fhanér, S. (1974). Item sampling and decision-making in achievement testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 172–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frary, R.B. (1980a). The effect of misinformation, partial information, and guessing on expected multiple-choice test item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frary, R.B. (1980b). Multiple-choice test bias due to answering strategy variation. Paper given at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frary, R.B. (1982). A simulation study of reliability and validity of multiple-choice test scores under six response-scoring modes. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Pérez, M.A. (19851 A finite state theory of performance in multiple-choice tests. Proceedings of the 16 u1 European Mathematical Psychology Group Meeting,Montpellier, France, 8–11 September. Pp 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Pérez, M.A. (1987). A finite state theory of performance in multiple-choice tests. In: E.E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.), Progress in Mathematical Psychology-1, 455–464. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Pérez, M.A. (in press). A comparison of two models of performance in objective tests: Finite states versus continuous distributions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Pérez, M.A., & Frary, R.B. (in press). Psychometric properties of finite state scores versus number-right and formula scores: A simulation study. Applied Psychological Measurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Pérez, M.A., & Frary, R.B. (1989). On the mathematical form (and psychological justification) of item characteristic curves. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J.D., Olkin, I., & Sobel, M. (1979). A subset selection technique for scoring items on a multiple choice test. Psychometrika, 44, 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R.M., & Gibson, W.H. (1988). Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R.V., & Tanis, E.A. (1977). Probabilityand Statistical Inference. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. (1980). Standard setting issues and methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D.J., & Davison, M.L. (1981). Review of test theory and methods. Research Report 81–1. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R.R. (1976). A note on the length and passing score of a mastery test. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R.R. (1987). New Statistical Procedures for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

García-Pérez, M.A. (1989). Item Sampling, Guessing, Partial Information and Decision-Making in Achievement Testing. In: Roskam, E.E. (eds) Mathematical Psychology in Progress. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83943-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83943-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51686-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83943-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics