Abstract
During the past century great progress has been made in developing noninvasive methods, both imaging and biochemical, for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP). Computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement (CECT) [1] and ultrasonography (US) [2] are examples of recent diagnostic techniques which, along with clinical assement of the patient, provide the basis for a decision on therapy. CECT and US are usually not available in the emergency room. The diagnostic work-up of a patient with suspected AP always starts with laboratory tests. Laboratory tests for the diagnosis of AP are based on the assay of pancreatic secretory products and various other components in small samples of body fluids and tissues, which supposedly reflect the presence and extent of inflammatory changes in the pancreas and the consequences of these on the body. It should be noted that these biochemical tests yield only indirect evidence of the pathological process. New tests are continuously being explored, implying that the ideal test for diagnosing AP and monitoring its course has not yet been established. As early as in 1952, Thistlethwaite and Hill emphasized that in order to assess the value of any method for diagnosing AP, the presence of the disease must be objectively verified. At that time, pancreatic biopsy via laparotomy was the only feasible way to do this, while in fatal disease postmortem examination was done [3]. The principle of objective verification of the diagnosis of AP was rarely adhered to in clinical studies until the introduction of CT and US. Since 80% of patients with AP present an uncomplicated course, operation to verify diagnosis is usually not justified. The lack of a reliable reference method for the diagnosis of AP has created substantial difficulties in the interpretation of published reports [4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mödder U, Friedmann G, Rosenberger J (1981) Wert der Angio-CT für Stadieneinteilung, Verlaufsbeobachtung und Therapie bei akuter Pancreatitis. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr 134:22–27
Lawson TL (1978) Sensitivity of pancreatic ultrasonography in the detection of pancreatic disease. Radiology 128:733
Thistlethwaite JR, Hill RP (1952) Serum amylase levels in experimental pancreatitis. Surgery 31:495–501
Spechler SJ, Schimmel EH (1985) Serum amylase in pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 30:92–93
Koehler DF, Eckfeldt JH, Levitt MD (1982) Diagnostic value of routine isoamylase assay of hyperamylasemic serum. Gastroenterology 82:887–890
Weaver DW, Bouwman DL, Walt AJ, Clink D, Resto A, Stephany J (1982) A correlation between clinical pancreatitis and isoenzyme patterns of amylase. Surgery 92:576–580
Sacchetti L, Cavalcanti E, Cerasuolo D, Oriani G, Uomo G, Rabitti PG, Laccetti M, Visconti M, Salvatore F (1989) Evaluation of pancreatic amylase immunoassay in acute pancreatitis. Clin Chim Acta 183:95–100
Blind PJ, Büchler M, Bläckberg L, Andersson Y, Uhl W, Beger HG, Hernell O (1991) Carboxylic ester hydrolase. A sensitive serum marker and indicator of severity of acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 8:65–73
Bowen M, Cooper EH, McMahon MJ (1983) The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: enhanced sensitivity from an ELISA assay of lipase. Biomed Pharmacother 37:395–398
Gullo L, Ventrucci M, Pezzilli R, Platé L, Naldoni P (1987) Diagnostic value of serum elastase 1 in pancreatic disease. Br J Surg 74:44–47
Steinberg WM, Goldstein SS, Davis ND, Shamma’a J, Anderson K (1985) Diagnostic assays in acute pancreatitis. A study of sensitivity and specificity. Ann Intern Med 102:576–580
Thomson HJ, Obekpa PO, Smith AN, Brydon WG (1987) Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a proposed sequence of biochemical investigations. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:719–724
Büchler M, Uhl W, Malfertheiner P (1986) Elastase 1 in acute pancreatitis. In: Beger HG, Büchler M (eds) Acute pancreatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 100–117
Ventrucci M, Pezzilli R, Gullo L, Platé L, Sprovieri G, Barbara L (1989) Role of serum pancreatic enzyme assays in diagnosis of pancreatic disease. Dig Dis Sci 34:39–45
Büchler M, Malfertheiner P, Schädlich H, Nevalainen TJ, Friess H, Beger HG (1989) Role of phospholipase A2 in human acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 97:1521–1526
Patt HH, Kramer SP, Woel G, Zeitung D, Seligman AM (1966) Serum lipase determination in acute pancreatitis. Arch Surg 92:718–723
Clavien P-A, Robert J, Meyer P, Borst F, Hauser H, Herrmann F, Dunand V, Rohner A (1989) Acute pancreatitis and normoamylasemia. Ann Surg 210: 614–620
Mayer AD, McMahon MJ, Holdsworth PJ, Wilson DH, Flowers MW, Brown DA (1985) Screening for acute pancreatitis: a rapid assay for plasma lipase. Br J Surg 72:436–437
Goldberg DM (1990) Biochemical tests in pancreatic disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 6:739–749
Overbeek GA (1957) Fat-splitting enzymes in blood. Clin Chim Acta 2:1–8
Junge W, Leybold K, Kraack B (1983) Influence of colipase on the turbidimetric determination of pancreatic lipase catalytic activity. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21:445–451
Boissonnas RA (1948) Estérases. II. Purification partielle de la lipase de pancréas de porc. Helv Chim Acta 31:1577–1583
Blind PJ, Blàckberg L, Hernell O, Ljungberg B (1987) Carboxylic ester hydrolase: a serum marker of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2:597–603
Leybold A, Junge W (1986) Importance of colipase for the measurement of serum lipase activity. Adv Clin Enzymol 4:60–67
Bradshaw WS, Rutter WJ (1972) Multiple pancreatic lipases. Tissue distribution and pattern of accumulation during embryological development. Biochemistry 11:1517–1528
Grenner G, Deutsch G, Schmidtberger R, Dati F (1982) Hochempfindlicher Enzymimmunoassay zur Bestimmung von Human-Pankreas-Lipase. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 20:515–519
Hâggmark A, Cho J-W, Lamminpàà K, Lundh G, Seligson U (1983) Immunochemical determination of pancreatic lipase in serum, duodenal fluid and urine in patients with pancreatic disease. Digestion 28:32–33 (abstr)
Jensen R (1983) Detection and determination of lipase (acylglycerol hydrolase) activity from various sources. Lipids 18:650–657
Royse VL (1984) Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a sensitive radioimmunoassay for lipase (Nuclipase, Nuclin Diagnostics). Clin Chem 30:1058 (abstr)
Jensen DM, Royse VL, Newell Bonello J, Schaffner J (1987) Use of amylase isoenzymes in laboratory evaluation of hyperamylasemia. Dig Dis Sci 32: 561–568
Roberts IM, Mercer D (1987) Radioimmunoassay for human pancreatic lipase in acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 32:388–392
Hayakawa T, Kondo T, Shibata T, Kitagawa M, Ono H, Sakai Y, Kiriyama S (1989) Enzyme immunoassay for serum lipase in the diagnosis of pancreatic lipase. Gastroenterol Jpn 24:556–560
Blàckberg L, Blind PJ, Ljungberg B, Hernell O (1985) On the source of bile salt-stimulated lipase in human milk: a study based on serum concentrations as determined by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 4:441–445
Sternby B, Âkerstrôm B (1984) Immunoreactive pancreatic colipase, lipase, phospholipase A2 in human plasma and urine from healthy individuals. Biochim Biophys Acta 789:164–169
Clavien P-A, Burgan S, Moossa AR (1989) Serum enzymes and other laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 76:1234–1243
Williamson RCN (1984) Early assessment of severity in acute pancreatitis. Gut 25:1331–1339
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Blind, P.J. (1993). Pancreatic Secretory Enzymes in the Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis. In: Beger, H.G., Büchler, M., Malfertheiner, P. (eds) Standards in Pancreatic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77437-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77437-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77439-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77437-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive