Abstract
During the phase of empirically oriented personality research, methodological problems concerning questionnaires have mainly been discussed with respect to test statistical properties (cf. Löhr & Angleitner, 1980, p. 218). Unfortunately, validity coefficients, expressed as correlations between test scores and an external criterion, generally remained relatively low [according to Janke (1973) between .20 and .30]. One reason for this might be that research focused on responses to items, but rarely on the conditions leading to responses. What seems necessary is the reconstruction of the entire process of responding to an item, and the specification of relations between the components which constitute this process (cf. Fiske, 1982; Schwarzer, 1982). The aim of such an approach is the elimination of methodological artifacts in a more direct way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boysson-Bardies, B. de (1970). Syntax and semantics in memorization of negation. In Flores d’Arcais, G.B.J., & Levelt, W.J.M. (Eds.), Advances in psycholinguistics (pp. 237–245). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge/Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Edwards, A.L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Cen-tury-Crofts.
Engelkamp, J. (1974). Psycholinguistik. Munich: Fink.
Ertel, S. (1974). Satzsubjekt und Ich-Perspektive. In Eckensberger, L.H., & Eckensberger, U.S. (Eds.), Bericht über den 28. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Saarbrücken 1972 (Vol. 1, pp. 129–139). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Ertel, S. (1977). Where do the subjects of sentences come from? In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Sen tence production. Developments in research and theory (pp. 141–167). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Fillmore, C.J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E., & Harms, R. (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Fillmore, C.J. (1977). The case for case reopened. In Cole, P., & Sadock, J. (Eds.), Grammatical relations (pp. 59–81). New York: Academic.
Fiske, D.W. (1982, June). What can we do with personality questionnaires? Bielefeld Sym-posium on Personality Questionnaires ,Bielefeld.
Franks, J.J., & Bransford, J.D. (1974). Memory for syntactic form as a function of semanticontext. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103 ,1037–1039.
Gough, H.G. (1956). California Psychological Inventory (CPI). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.
Gough, P.B. (1965). Grammatical transformation and speed of understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4 ,107–111.
Herriot, P. (1969). The comprehension of active and passive sentences as a function of pragmatic expectations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8 ,166–169.
Hörmann, H. (1971). Semantic factors in negation. Psychologische Forschung ,35 ,1–16.
Hörmann, H. (1978). Meinen und Verstehen. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Hörmann, H. (1981). Einführung in die Psycholinguistik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buch-gesellschaft.
Hörmann, H. (1982). Hidden determinants of understanding. In LeNy, J.-F., & Kintsch, W.(Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 251–260). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hörmann, H., Pieper, U., & Engelkamp, J. (1976). Zur psychologischen Problematik sog. Al-tersdialekte. Psychologische Rundschau ,27 ,12–27.
Jackendoff, R.S. (1969). An interpretive theory of negation. Foundations of Language ,5, 218–241.
Janke, W. (1973). Über die Konstruktion von Fragebögen. In Reinert, G. (Ed.), Bericht über den 27. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Kiel 1970 (pp. 41–48). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Layton, P., & Simpson, A.J. (1975). Surface and deep structure in sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14 ,658–664.
Lienert, G.A. (1969). Testaufbau und Testanalyse (3 rd ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.
Löhr, F.-J., & Angleitner, A. (1980). Eine Untersuchung zu sprachlichen Formulierungen der Items in deutschen Persönlichkeitsfragebogen. Zeitschrift für Differ entielle und Diagno stische Psychologie ,1, 217–235.
Löhr, F.-J., & Schütte, W. (1982). Zur linguistischen Analyse von Fragebogenitems-eine Pi lot-Studie. Bielefeld: Arbeitsbericht aus dem Projekt Persönlichkeitsfragebogen (No. 1),Universität Bielefeld.
IMehler, J. (1963). Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2 ,346, 351.
Micklin, M., & Durbin, M. (1969). Syntactic dimensions of attitude scaling techniques:Sources of variation and bias. Sociometry, 32 ,194–206.
Miller, G.A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 17 ,748–762.
Sachs, J.S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics, 2 ,437–442.
Schank, R.C. (1975). Conceptual information processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schwarzer, R. (1982, June). Convergent and discriminant validity in personality assessment:Techniques for distinguishing trait and method variance. Bielefeld Symposium on Person- Iality Questionnaires ,Bielefeld.
Sherman, M.A. (1976). Adjectival negation and the comprehension of multiply negated sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15 ,143–157.
JSlobin, D.J. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5 ,219–227.
Slobin, D.J. (1968). Recall of full and truncated passive sentences in connected discourse. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7 ,876–881.
Wason, P.C., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning. Structure and content. London: Batsford.
Weinert, A.B. (1982). Deutscher CPI: Testanweisung und Test. Bern: Huber
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Helfrich, H. (1986). On Linguistic Variables Influencing the Understanding of Questionnaire Items. In: Angleitner, A., Wiggins, J.S. (eds) Personality Assessment via Questionnaires. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70753-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70751-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive