Skip to main content

Abstract

The personality questionnaire has been with us for more than 60 years. It has been, and still is, the most popular method of personality assessment and it no doubt will continue to be so. The method has been sharply criticized since its inception (e.g., Allport, 1921; Watson, 1933; Ellis, 1946; Janke, 1973), and this criticism is also likely to continue. The long-standing indifference of test constructors to criticisms of their craft is brought home by noting the similarities between objections raised many years ago and those that are offered today (Gynther & Green, 1982). Within this context, one might well ask why a book on personality questionnaires should appear at this time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G.W. (1921). Personality and character. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M., & Berg, I.A. (Eds.). (1959). Objective approaches to personality assessment. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1965). The challenge of response sets. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A.L. (1980). Handbook of interpretation for the Comrey Personality Scales. San Diego: EdITS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, W.G., Welsh, G.S. & Dahlstrom, L.E. (1972). An MMPI handbook. Vol. 1: Clinical interpretation (rev. ed.) Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, W.G., Welsh, G.S. & Dahlstrom, L.E. (1975). An MMPI handbook. Vol. 2: Research applications (rev. ed.). Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1946). The validity of personality questionnaires. Psychological Bulletin, 43, 385–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gynther, M.D., & Green, S.B. (1982). Methodological problems in research with self-report inventories. In Kendall, P.C., & Butcher, J.N. (Eds.), A handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 355–386). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke, W. (1973). Ãœber die Konstruktion von Fragebögen. Bericht über ein Symposium: Das Dilemma von Persönüchkeitsfragebögen. In Reinert, G. (Ed.), Bericht über den 27. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Kiel 1970 (pp. 41–48). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G.B. (1933). New steps in personality measurement. Character and Personality, 2, 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Angleitner, A., Wiggins, J.S. (1986). Introduction. In: Angleitner, A., Wiggins, J.S. (eds) Personality Assessment via Questionnaires. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70753-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70751-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics