Skip to main content

Abstract

Before the execution of a sequence of voluntary movements, a memory representation with instructions for the entire sequence is thought to be established in the central nervous system. There are three main sources of support for the existence of such a memory representation, or motor program, as it has been called. First, animals whose sensory feedback systems are impaired can often perform movements skillfully (see Evarts, Bizzi, Burke, Delong, & Thach, 1971; Glencross, 1977; Keele, 1968; Summers, 1981). Second, anticipatory errors in movement production (e.g., Spoonerisms in speech) indicate that information about segments of a sequence may often be available in memory well before the time of their execution (see Fromkin, 1973, 1980; Garrett, 1975, 1982; Norman, 1981). Third, the time to initiate a sequence of movements can depend on characteristics of the sequence, such as its timing (Klapp, 1978; Rosenbaum & Patashnik, 1980a,b) or length (e.g., Henry & Rogers, 1960; Sternberg, Monsell, Knoll, & Wright, 1978).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

References Notes

  1. Rosenbaum, D.A. Inhoff, A.W., & Gordon, A. Choosing bet2ween movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenbaum, D.A., & Saltzman, E. Level of choice in the production of movement sequences. Paper presented at the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN, November 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klapp, S.T. Personal communication, December 1982.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Bertelson, P. S-R relationships and reaction-times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 478–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson, P. Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition.Nature, 1965, 205, 217–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, K.W. Ipsilateral confusion in 2-choice and 4-choice responses with the hands and feet. Nature, 1963, 199, 1312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, K.W. Errors in a further four-choice reaction task with the hands and feet. Nature, 1964, 201, 641–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evarts, E.V., Bizzi, E., Burke, R.E., DeLong, M., & Thach, W.T., Jr. Central control of movement. Neurosciences Research Program Bulletin, 1911, 9, 1–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V.A. (Ed.) Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V.A. (Ed.) Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. The analysis of sentence production. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation, (Vol. 6 ). New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. London: Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glencross, D.J. Control of skilled movements. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 14–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F.M., & Rogers, D. Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 1960, 31, 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychologica, 1982,50, 35–47. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica, 1982,50, 49–60. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S.W. Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, N. Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A.T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times. London: Academic Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S.T. Reaction time analysis of programmed control. In R. Hutton (Ed.), Exercise and sports sciences reviews, Vol. 5. Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S. Sequential effects in choice reaction time: A tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance, (Vol. 4 ). New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982, 8, 273–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 1981, 88, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P.M.A. Times for transitions between hand and foot responses in a self-paced task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18, 334–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P.M.A. Repetition effects and signal classification strategies in serial choice-response tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 232–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P.M.A., & Vyas, S.M. An elementary taxonomy for some errors in laboratory choice RT tasks. Acta Psychologica, 1970, 55, 56–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A. Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1980, 109, 444–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., Kenny, S., & Derr, M.A. Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983, 9, 86–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., & Patashnik, O. A mental clock setting process revealed by reaction times. In G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., & Patashnik, O. Time to time in the human motor system. In R.S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.A., Saltzman, E., & Kingman, A. Choosing between movement sequences. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R.L., & Wright, C.E. The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G.E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J.J. Motor programs. In D.H. Holding (Ed.), Human skills. Chichester, Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenbaum, D.A., Saltzman, E. (1984). A Motor-Program Editor. In: Prinz, W., Sanders, A.F. (eds) Cognition and Motor Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69384-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69382-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics