Abstract
Studies with tactile vision substitution for congenitally blind persons provide an unusual opportunity to observe the acquisition of “visual” spatial concepts in adolescents and adults. Since all aspects of the training are under the experimenter’s control, the effects of each component of the process can be studied. In this paper the relationship between motor processes and cognition will be examined; specifically, the effect of placing the “eye” (television camera) under the control of the blind subject. We have noted that as long as the subject can control the movement of the camera, he can perceive in terms of the three-dimensional visual spatial world of which he is a part. It is possible to change the location and even the orientation of the tactile array (e.g., from the skin of the back to the abdomen), or the motor system controlling camera movement (either hand held, or located on spectacle frames and thus controlled by neck muscles), without compromising accurate spatial orientation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
References Notes
Guarniero, G. The senses and the perception of space. New York University Department of Philosophy, Ph.D. Thesis. University Microfilms (Nos. 78-3097), Ann Arbor, MI, 1977.
Jannson, G., & Brabyn, L. Tactually guided batting, Uppsala Psychological Reports no. 304, Uppsala, Sweden, 1981.
References
Bach-y-Rita, P. Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution, p. 192. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Bach-y-Rita, P. Sensory substitution in rehabilitation. In L. Illis, M. Sedgwick, & H. Granville (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the neurological patient, pp. 361–383. Oxford: Blackwell Press, 1982.
Bach-y-Rita, P. Tactile vision substitution: Past and future. International Journal of Neuroscience, 1983, 79, 29–35.
Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C.C., Saunders, F., White, B., & Scadden, L. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature, 1969, 221, 963–964.
Collins, C.C., & Bach-y-Rita, P. Transmission of pictorial information through the skin. Advances in Biological and Medical Physics, 1973, 14, 285–315.
Doty, R.W. Lashley as iconoclast in the temple of neuroscience: Some thrusts he would have enjoyed today. In J. Orbach (Ed.), Neuropsychology after Lashley, pp. 229–246. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982.
Feinsod, M., Bach-y-Rita, P., & Madey, J.M. Somatosensory evoked responses — Latency differences in blind and sighted persons. Brain Research, 1973, 60, 219–223.
Gibson, J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton, 1966.
Guarniero,G. Experience of tactile vision. Perception, 1974, 3, 101–104.
Guarniero, G. Tactile vision: A personal view. Journal of Blindness and Visual Impairment, 1977, 71, 125–130.
Jonides, J., Irwin, D.E., & Yantes, S. Intepating visual information from successive fixations. Science, 1982, 215, 192–194.
Lashley, K.S. Studies of cerebral function in learning. XII. Loss of the maze habit after lesions in blind rats. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1943, 79, 431–462.
Miller, G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 1956,63, 81–97.
Murata, K., Cramer, H., & Bach-y-Rita, P. Neuronal convergence of nocious, acoustic and visual stimuli in the visual cortex of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 1223–1239.
Rogers, C.H. Choice of stimulator frequency for tactile arrays. IEEE Trans. Man-Machine System, 1910, 11, 5–11.
Rosenzweig, M.R., Krech, D., Bennett, E.L., & Diamond, M.C. Effects of environmental complexity and training on brain chemistry and anatomy: a replication and extension. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962, 55, 429–437.
Teuber, H.-L. Perception. In J. Field (Ed.), Handbook of physiology, (Vol 3, pp. 1595–1668 ). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1960.
Thompson, R. Functional organization of the rat lesion. In J. Orbach (Ed.), Neuropsychology after Lashley, (pp. 207–208 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982.
von Bekesy, G. Sensory inhibition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.
von Hoist, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. Das Reafferenzprinzip (Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie). Naturwissenschaften, 1950, 37, 464–476.
White, B.W., Saunders, F.A., Scadden, L., Bach-y-Rita, P., & Collins, C.C. Seeing with the skin. Perception andPsychophysics, 1970, 7, 23–27.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bach-y-Rita, P. (1984). The Relationship Between Motor Processes and Cognition in Tactile Vision Substitution. In: Prinz, W., Sanders, A.F. (eds) Cognition and Motor Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69384-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69382-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive