Skip to main content

Hypnotisierbarkeit, Suggestibilität und Trancetiefe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hypnose in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Skalen zur Messung hypnotherapeutischer Konstrukte, v. a. Suggestibilität, Hypnotisierbarkeit, Imaginationsfähigkeit oder Trancetiefe, haben in der Forschung zur Hypnotherapie einen hohen Stellenwert. Dennoch gibt es besonders in der Praxis Vorbehalte gegen den Einsatz der oftmals zeitintensiven Skalen. Das Kapitel befasst sich mit den theoretischen Grundlagen hypnoserelevanter Konstrukte. Dabei werden aktuelle Befunde zur Anwendung sowie zum Zusammenhang mit dem Erfolg einer hypnotherapeutischen Behandlung berichtet. Das Kapitel gibt einen differenzierten Überblick über bestehende Messverfahren, der bei der Auswahl eines Tests für Forschung oder Praxis unterstützen soll.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Anderson EL (1982) Effects of hypnotic inductions on the nasal congestion of 24 hayfever sufferers. The Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreychuk T, Skriver C (1975) Hypnosis and biofeedback in the treatment of migraine headache. International Int J Clin Exp Hypn 23: 172–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander B, Turnbull D, Cyna A (2009) The effect of pregnancy on hypnotizability. Am J Clin Hypn 52:89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghdadi G, Nasrabadi AM (2012) Comparision of different EEG features in estimation of hypnosis susceptibility level. Computers in Biology and Medicine 42: 590–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Balthazard CG (1993) The hypnosis scales at their centenary: Some fundamental issues still unresolved. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 41: 47–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasz AF (1982) Restricted environmental stimulation and the enhancement of hypnotizability: Pain, EEG alpha, skin conductance and temperature processes. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 30: 147–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasz AF (1990) Eingeschränkte Stimulation durch die Umwelt ruft spontane Hypnose für die Schmerzkontrolle beim cold pressor Test hervor. / Restricted environmental stimulation elicits spontaneous hypnosis for cold pressor pain control. (Trans H.-J. Hautkappe). Experimentelle und Klinische Hypnose 6: 95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasz AF, Watkins JG (2005) Hypnotherapeutic techniques. Brunner-Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasz AF, Perez N (2007) Salient findings: hypnotizability as core construct and the clinical utility of hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 55: 372–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasz M (1991) Hypnotizability in bulimia. Int J Eat Disord 10: 117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber TX (1969) Hypnosis: A scientific approach. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber TX, Calverley DS (1964) The definition of the situation as a variable affecting „hypnotic-like“ suggestibility. J Clin Psychol 20: 438–440

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett D (1996) Fantasizers and dissociators: Two types of high hypnotizabels, two different imagery styles. In: Kunzendorf RG, Spanos NP, Wallace B (eds) Hypnosis and imagination. Baywood, Amityville, S 123–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendefeldt F, Miller LL, Ludwig AM (1976) Cognitive performance in conversion hysteria. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33: 1250–1254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benham G, Smith N, Nash MR (2002) Hypnotic susceptibility scales: are mean scores increasing. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 50: 5–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim H (1884) De la suggestion dans l’état hypnotique et dans l’état de veille. Doin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim H (1917) Automatisme et suggestion. Alcan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein E, Putnam FW (1986) Development, reliability and validity of a dissociation scale. J Nerv Ment Dis 147: 727–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss EL (1983) Multiple personalities, related disorders and hypnosis. Am J Clin Hypn 26: 114–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss EL (1986) Multiple personalities, allied disorders and hypnosis. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongartz W (1985) German norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 33: 131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braffman W, Kirsch I (1999) Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 77: 578–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler LD, Duran REF, Jasiukaitis P et. al. (1996) Hypnotizability and traumatic experience: A diathesis-stress model of dissociative symptomatology. Am J Psychiatry 153: 42–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardeña E, Svensson C, Hejdtröm F (2013) Hypnotic tape intervention ameliorates stress: a randomized control study. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 61: 125–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasena R (1982) Hypnosis in the treatment of viral warts. Psychiatr J Univ Ott 7: 135–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale KY, Berg R, Eden A, Odegard A, Holte A (2009) Testing the diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder through measures of dissociation, absorption, hypnotizability and PTSD: a Norwegian pilot study. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation 10: 102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienes Z, Brown E, Hutton S et al. (2009) Hypnotic suggestibility, cognitive inhibition, and dissociation. Consciousness and cognition 18: 837–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonston W (1986) The induction of hypnosis. J. Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewer TC, Stewart DE (1986) Improvement of bronchial hyper-responsiveness in patients with moderate asthma after treatment with a hypnotic technique. Br Med J: 1129–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith M, Ray WJ (1994) Hypnotizability and dissociation in a college age population: Orthogonal differences. Pers Individ Dif 17: 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Godeby J, Erdt G, Canavan T, Revenstorf D (1993) Experimentelle Hypermnesie: Effekte von Hypnose auf Lern- und Gedächtnisprozesse. Experimentelle und Klinische Hypnose 4: 71–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Field PB (1965) An inventory scale of hypnotic depth. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 13(4): 238–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fingelkurts AA, Kallio S, Revonsuo A (2007) Cortex functional connectivity as a neurophysiological correlate of hypnosis: an EEG case study. Neuropsychologia 45: 1452–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flammer E, Alladin A (2007) The efficacy of hypnotherapy in the treatment of psychosomatic disorders: Meta-analytical evidence. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 55: 251–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger E, Peter B, Prade T, Piesbergen C (2014) Intelligence and hypnotic susceptibility: Is there a connection? Int J Clin Exp Hypn 62(3): 310–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gfeller JD, Lynn SJ, Pribble WE (1987) Enhancing susceptibility: Interpersonal and rapport factors. J Pers Soc Psychol 52: 586–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gheorghiu VA (1996) Die adaptive Funktion suggestionaler Phänomene. Zum Stellenwert suggestionsbedingter Einflüsse. HyKog 13: 125–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorassini DR, Spanos NP (1986) A cognitive skills approach to the successful modification of hypnotic susceptibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 50: 1004–1012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green JP, Lynn SJ (2000). Hypnosis and suggestion-based approaches to smoking cessation: an examination of the evidence. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 48(2): 195–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halsband U (Hrsg) (2004) Mechanismen des Lernens in Trance: funktionelle Bildgebung und Neuropsychologie. HyKog In: Hirn und Hypnose. ▶ www.MEG-Stiftung.de, München. Vol HyKog 21 (1 + 2): 11–38

  • Hammer AG, Evans FJ, Bartlett M (1963) Factors in hypnosis and suggestion. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67: 15–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard ER (1965) Hypnotic susceptibility. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard ER (1981) Hypnotic susceptibility scales under attack: An examination of Weitzenhoffer’s criticism. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 29: 24–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard ER (1989) Eine Neo-Dissoziationstheorie des geteilten Bewußtseins. HyKog 6: 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard ER, Hilgard JR (1975/1983) Hypnosis in the relief of pain. Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogduin K (1988) Hypnotizability in obsessive-compulsives. Hypnos 15: 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner M (1993) Einflußfaktoren suggestionsbedingter Verhaltensweisen. Peter Lang, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson-Phillips S, Gow K (2007) Hypnotizability, eating behaviors, attitudes, and concerns: A literature survey. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 55: 84–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janet P (1919/1976) Psychological healing: A historical and clinical study. Vol 2 Paul E & C(Trans.). MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch I (2000) Hypnosis and Placebo: Response Expectancy as a mediat. In: De Pascalis V Gheorghiu VA Sheehan PW Kirsch I (eds) Suggestion and Suggestibility Theory and Research: Hypnosis International Monographs No 4. ▶ www.MEG-Stiftung.de, München, S 211–228

  • Kirsch I, Council JR (1992) Situational and personality correlates of hypnotic responsiveness. In: Fromm E, Nash MR (eds) Contemporary hypnosis research. Guilford, New York, S 267–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch I, Cardeña E, Derbyshire S et al. (2011) Definitionen von Hypnose und Hypnotisierbarkeit und deren Bezug zur Suggestion und Suggestibilität. Ein Konsensus Statement. Hypnose 6: 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause C (2000) Posthypnotische Amnesie für therapeutische Geschichten. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Tübingen, Psychologisches Institut, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyk J, Spinhoven P, van Dyck R (1999) Hypnotic recall: A positive criterion in the differential diagnosis between epileptic and pseudo-epileptic seizures. Epilepsia 40: 485–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kranhold C, Baumann U, Fichter M (1992) Hypnotizability in bulimic patients and controls. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 242: 72–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krause C, Revenstorf D (1998) Wirkung indirekter Hypnosetechniken auf Symptome der Prüfungsangst: Eine Audiokassettenstudie. HyKog 15: 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang D, Revenstorf D (2008) Praxis-Evaluation der Hypnotherapie: Einfluss von Imaginationsfähigkeit und Diagnose auf Therapiedurchführung und –Erfolg. Hypnose 3: 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen S (1965) Strategies for reducing phobic behavior. Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavertue NE, Kumar VE (2002) The effectiveness of a hypnotic ego-strenghtening procedure for improving self-esteem. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 30: 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie GF, Sabourin M (1980) Hypnosis and schizophrenia: A review of experimental and clinical studies. In: Burrows GD, Dennerstein L (eds) Handbook of hypnosis and psychosomatic medicine, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, S 377–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn SJ (2004) Enhancing Suggestibility: The Effects of Compliance vs. Imagery. Am J Clin Hypn 47: 117–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn SJ, Neufeld V, Mare C (1993) Direct versus indirect suggestions: A conceptual and methodological review. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 41: 124–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn SJ, Shindler K (2002) The role of hypnotizability assessment in treatment. Am J Clin Hypn 44: 185–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mewes I, Stich A, Habermüller MS, Revenstorf D (2003) Gewichtsreduktion unter Hypnose und Verhaltenstherapie. Verhaltensmedizin 24: 499–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Milling LS, Shores JS, Coursen EL et al. (2007) Response expectancies, treatment credibility, and hypnotic suggestibility: mediator and moderator effects in hypnotic and cognitive behavioral pain interventions. Annals of behavioral medicine 33: 167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milling LS, Coursen EL, Shores JS, Waszkiewicz JA (2010) The predictive utility of hypnotizability: The change in suggestibility produced by hypnosis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 78: 126–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moene FC, Spinhoven P, Hoogdoin KA, van Dyck R (2003) A randomized controlled clinical trial of a hypnosis-based treatment for patients with conversion disorder, motor type. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 51: 29–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan AH, Hilgard ER (1973) Age differences in susceptibility to hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 21: 78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JK, Fuller AK (1984) Hypnosis and biofeedback as adjunctive therapy in blepharospasm: A case report. Am J Clin Hypn 27: 31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Jobsis J (1991) An exploratory study of hypnotic capacity of schizophrenic and borderline patients in a clinical setting. Am J Clin Hypn 33: 150–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orne MT (1979) On the simulating subject as a quasi-control group in hypnosis research: What, why, and how. In: Fromm E & Shor RE (eds.) Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives, Guilford New York, S 21–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekala RJ, Forbes EJ (1997) Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience. Am J Clin Hypn 39: 212–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peter B (1993) Hypnotische Phänomene. In: Revenstorf D (Hrsg) Klinische Hypnose. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 25–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peter B (2006) Zur Geschichte der Dissoziativen Identitätsstörung: Justinus Kerner und das Mädchen von Orlach. In: Fiedler P (Hrsg) Trauma, Dissoziation, Persönlichkeit Pierre Janets Beiträge zur modernen Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie. Pabst, Lengerich, S 135–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter B, Bose C, Piersbergen C et al. (2012) Persönlichkeitsprofile deutschsprachiger Anwender von Hypnose und Hypnotherapie. Hypnose 7: 31–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter B, Geiger E, Prate T et al. (2015) Norms of German adolescents for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 63(1): 92–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peter B, Vogel SE, Prade T et al. (2014a) Hypnotisability, personality style and attachment. An exploratory study. Part 1: General results. Am J Clin Hypn 57(1): 13–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peter B, Prade T, Vogel SE et al. (2014b) Hypnotisability, personality style and attachment. An exploratory study. Part 2: Results with particular focus on sex. Am J Clin Hypn 57(1): 41–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettinati HM, Horne RL, Staats JS (1985) Hypnotizability in patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42: 1014–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettinati HM, Kogan LG, Evans FJ et al. (1990) Hypnotizability of psychiatric inpatients according to two different scales. Am J Psychiatry 147: 69–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piccione C, Hilgard ER, Zimbardo PG (1989) On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. J Pers Soc Psychol 56: 289–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piesbergen C, Peter B (2005) Was messen Suggestibilitätsskalen? Eine Untersuchung zur Faktorenstruktur der Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS: A). Hypnose: Zeitschrift für Hypnose und Hypnotherapie 0: 139–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Prete MI, Guido G, Pichierri M (2013) Consumer hypnotic-like suggestibility: possible mechanism in compulsive purchasing. Psychol Rep 113(1): 1174–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam FW, Helmers K, Horowitz LA, Trickett PK (1995) Hypnotizability and dissociativity in sexually abused girls. Child Abuse Negl 19: 645–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rominger M (1995) Metaanalye der Hypnotherapie. Diplomarbeit, Psycholog. Inst. d. Universität, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegel B, Kempkensteffen J, Tönnies S (2012) Ökonomische Suggestibilitätsmessung: Zwischen Illusion und Realität - Evaluationsergebnisse eines Tests zur Imaginationsfähigkeit. Entspannungsverfahren 29: 82–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegel B, Gierk B, Löwe B et al. (2014a) Measuring hypnotic suggestibility with an 11-item-version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Projektbericht

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegel B, Gierk, B, Löwe B, Tönnies S (2014b) Erfassung der Trancetiefe mit einer deutschen Version der Inventory Scale of Hypnotic-Depth – Ergebnisse zur psychometrischen Güte einer modifizierten und optimierten Version. Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Projektbericht

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz OB (2002) Freiberger Imaginations-, Relaxations- und Suggestibilitätstest (FIRST). Dietmar Klotz

    Google Scholar 

  • Small MM, Kramer E (1969) Hypnotic susceptibility as a function of the prestige of the hypnotist. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 17: 251–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos NP (1986) Hypnosis and the modification of hypnotic susceptibility. In: Naish PLN (ed) What is hypnosis. Open University Press, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos NP, Lush NI, Hodgins DC et al. (1983a) The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Relationship to other measures of susceptibility, expectancies and absorption. Psychol Rep 53: 723–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC et al. (1983b) The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Relationship to other measures of susceptibility, expectancies and absorption. Psychol Rep 53: 723–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC et al. (1983c) The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychol Rep 53: 523–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel D, Cardena E (1990) New uses of hypnosis in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 51: 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinhoven P, Van Dyck R, Hoogduin K, Schaap C (1991) Differences in hypnotisability of Dutch psychiatric outpatients according to two different scales. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 19: 107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam HJ, McGrath PA, Brooke PI, Cosier F (1986) The effects of a cognitive-behavioral treatment program on temporo-mandibular pain and disfunction syndrome. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 34: 182–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staudacher M, Hagl M, Piersbergen C, Peter B (2012). Sind Hypnotisierbarkeit und Bindung doch unkorreliert? Bericht über einen Replikationsversuch. Hypnose 7: 81–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus RA (1980) A naturalistic experiment investigating the effects of hypnotic induction upon creative imagination scale performance in a clinical setting. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 28: 218–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tart CT (1970) Self-report scales of hypnotic depth. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 18: 105–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen A, Atkinson G (1974) Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences („absorbtion“), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. J Abnorm Psychol 83: 268–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teschner R (2001) Hypnotherapie bei Flugangst. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhune DB, Cardeña E, Lindgren M (2011) Dissoziative tendencies and individual differences in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognitive neuropsychiatry 16: 113–135

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Kuile MM, Spinhoven P, Linssen ACG et al. (1994) Autogenic training and cognitive self-hypnosis for the treatment of recurrent headaches in three subject groups. Pain 58: 331–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinden J, Spinhoven P, Vandereycken W, van Dyck R (1995) Dissociative and hypnotic experiences in eating disorder patients: An exploratory study. Am J Clin Hypn 38: 97–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck R, Spinhoven, P (1997) Does preference for type of treatment matter? A study of exposure in vivo with or without hypnosis in the treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behavior Modification 21: 172–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck R Zitman FG Linssen AC Spinhoven P (1991) Autogenic training and future oriented hypnotic imagery in the treatment of tension headache: Outcome and process. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 39: 6–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace B (1993) Day persons, night persons and variability in hypnotic susceptibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 64: 827–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzenhoffer AM (1989a) Betrachtung der Hypnotisierbarkeit: Mehr als dreißig Jahre später. Experimentelle und Klinische Hypnose 5: 63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzenhoffer AM (1989b) The practice of hypnotism. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER (1959) Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER (1962) Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale Form C. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SC (1976) An experimental investigation evaluating a Creative Imagination Scale and its relationship to „hypnotic-like“ experiences. Heed University, Hollywood Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SC, Barber TX (1978) The Creative Imagination Scale as a measure of hypnotic responsiveness: Applications to experimental and clinical hypnosis. Am J Clin Hypn 20: 235–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yard SS, DuHamel KN, Galynker II (2008) Hypnotizability as a potential risk factor for posttraumatic stress: a review of quantitative studies. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 56: 334–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariae R, Jorgensen MM, Christensen S (2000) Hypnotizability and absorption in a Danish sample: Testing the influence of context. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 48: 306–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeyer R, Dürr W, Revenstorf D (1992) Hypnotherapie bei Prüfungsangst. Experimentelle und Klinische Hypnose 8: 71–87

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Krause .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krause, C., Riegel, B. (2015). Hypnotisierbarkeit, Suggestibilität und Trancetiefe. In: Revenstorf, D., Peter, B. (eds) Hypnose in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54577-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54577-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54576-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54577-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics