Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alternative Techniques for Pericardiocentesis

  • Chapter
Interventional Pericardiology

  • 730 Accesses

Abstract

Pericardiocentesis of moderate, small or loculated pericardial effusions is a controversial issue. It should not be routinely performed if the patient is not symptomatic and effusion is spontaneously resolving and unless further diagnostic and/or therapeutic options are available (e.g. pericardioscopy, epicardial or pericardial biopsy, application of intrapericardial treatment). In addition, access to the small or moderated effusions requires a learning curve. Several experimental and few clinical concepts have been developed for access of a small pericardial effusion or normal pericardium. These procedures will be reviewed in the following sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Botsch H. Pericardial effusion: its demonstration through the epicardial fat. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 1977; 127(2): 170–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carsky EW, Mauceri RA, Azimi F. The epicardial fat pad sign: analysis of frontal and lateral chest radiographs in patients with pericardial effusion. Radiology 1980; 137(2): 303–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heinsimer JA, Collins GJ, Burkman MH, et al. Supine crosstable lateral chest roentgenogram for the detection of pericardial effusion. JAMA 1987; 257(23): 3266–3268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ristić AD. Pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial treatment: Advances of the technique, diagnostic, and therapeutic value. Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Medicine, Philipps Universty Marburg, Germany, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg MJ, Dunn MM, Kanth N, et al. Diagnostic value of chest radiography for pericardial effusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 588–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Torrance DJ. Demonstration of subepicardial fat as an aid in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion or thickening. Am J Roentgenol 1955; 74: 850–855

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goebel N. Pericardial shadows caused by fatty tissue – the chest image and computer tomography. Prax Klin Pneumol 1985; 39(9): 309–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tehranzadeh J, Kelley MJ. The differential density sign of pericardial effusion. Radiology 1979; 133(1): 23–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taguchi R, Takasu J, Itani Y, et al. Pericardial fat accumulation in men as a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2001; 157(1): 203–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kremens V. Demonstration of the pericardial shadow on the routine chest roentgenogram: a new roentgen finding. Radiology 1955; 64: 72–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maisch B, Ristić AD. Practical aspects of the management of pericardial disease. Heart 2003; 89(9): 1096–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanth N, Eisenberg M, Gamsu G. Effect of varying kVp on visibility of epicardial fat stripe in pericardial effusions [letter]. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164(2): 510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lane EJ Jr, Carsky EW. Epicardial fat: Lateral plain film analysis in normals and in pericardial effusion. Radiology 1968; 91(1): 1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jorgens J, Kundel R, Lieber A. The cinefluorography approach to the diagnosis of pericardial effusion. Am J Roentgenol 1962; 87: 911–916

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Duvernoy O, Borowiec J, Helmius G, et al. Complications of percutaneous pericardiocentesis under fluoroscopic guidance. Acta Radiol 1992; 33(4): 309–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krikorian JG, Hancock EW. Pericardiocentesis. Am J Med 1978; 65: 808–812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodeheffer RJ. Pericardiocentesis. In: Holmes DR, Vlietstra RE, eds. Interventional Cardiology. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, 1989, pp 210–217

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsang TS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK, et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77(5): 429–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Macris PM, Igo SR. Minimally invasive access of the normal pericardium: Initial clinical experience with a novel device. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22 (Suppl 1): I-36–39

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rieger PJ, Beaurline CM, Grabek JR. Intrapericardial therapeutics and diagnostics. In: Seferovic PM, Spodick DH, Maisch B, Maksimovic R, Ristic AD (eds) Pericardiology: Contemporary Answers to Continuing Challenges. Science, Belgrade, 2000, pp 393–406

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maisch B, Ristić AD, Rupp H, Spodick DH. Pericardial access using the PerDUCER® and flexible percutaneous pericardioscopy. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(11): 1323–1326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seferovic PM, Ristic AD, Maksimovic R, et al. Initial clinical experience with PerDUCER®: promising new tool in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial disease. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22(suppl I): I-30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maisch B, Drude L. Pericardioscopy – a new diagnostic tool in inflammatory diseases of the pericardium. Eur Heart J 1991; 12 (Suppl D): 2–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maisch B, Bethge C, Drude L, Hufnagel G, Herzum M, Schoenian U. Pericardioscopy and epicardial biopsy-new diagnostic tools in pericardial and perimyocardial disease. Eur Heart J 1994; 15 (Suppl C): 68–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maisch B, Pankuweit S, Brilla C, et al. Intrapericardial treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic pericarditis guided by pericardioscopy and epicardial biopsy – results from a pilot study. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22 (Suppl I): I-17–22

    Google Scholar 

  26. Seferovic PM, Ristic AD, Maksimovic R, Ostojic M, Simeunovic D, Petrovic P, Maisch B. Flexible percutaneous pericardioscopy: inherent drawbacks and, recent advances. Herz 2000; 25: 741–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grimm W, Sharkova J, Funck R, Maisch B. How many patients with dilated cardiomyopathy may potentially benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26 (1 Pt 2): 155–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Funck RC, Blanc JJ, Mueller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, Bailleul C, Maisch B; BioPace Study Group. Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the ‘Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)’ study. Europace 2006; 8(8): 629–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Steinberg JS, Derose JJ. The rationale for nontransvenous leads and cardiac resynchronization devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003; 26: 2211–2212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mair H, Sachweh J, Meuris B, et al. Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 235–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ota T, Patronik N, Riviere C, Zenati MA. Percutaneous subxiphoid access to the epicardium using a miniature crawling robotic device. Innovations 2006; 1(5): 227–231

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mannam AP, Ho KK, Cultip DE, et al. Safety of subxyphoid pericardial access using a blunt-tip needle. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89(7): 891–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Laham R, Rezaee M, Post M, et al. Intrapericardial delivery of fibroblast growth factor-2 induces neovascularization in a porcine model of chronic myocardial ischemia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000; 292: 795–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Laham R, Hung D, Simons M. Subxyphoid access of the normal pericardium: a novel drug delivery technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1999; 47: 109–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sosa E, Scanavacca M, d’Avila A, Pilleggi F. A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7(6): 531–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kiser AC, Nifong LW, Raman J, Kasirajan V, Campbell N, Chitwood WR Jr. Evaluation of a novel epicardial atrial fibrillation treatment system. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85(1): 300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shivkumar K. Percutaneous epicardial ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2008; 5(1): 152–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brugada J, Berruezo A, Cuesta A, et al. Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial radiofrequency ablation: an alternative in incessant ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41(11): 2036–2043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. De Divitlis M, Dialleto G, Covino FE, et al. An unusual procedure for the treatment of simultaneous pericardial and pleural effusions. G Ital Cardiol 1999; 29: 796–798

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ceron L, Manzato M, Mazzaro F, Bellavere F. A new diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pericardial effusion: transbronchial needle aspiration. Chest 2003; 123(5): 1753–1758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang KP. How I do it: transbronchial needle aspiration. J Bronchol 1994; 1: 63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chavanon O, Barbe C, Troccaz J, et al. Accurate guidance for percutaneous access to a specific target in soft tissues: preclinical study of computer-assisted pericardiocentesis. Laparoscop Adv Surg Tech 1999; 9: 259–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Chavanon O, Carrat L, Pasqualini C, Dubois E, Blin D, Troccaz J. Computer guided pericardiocentesis: experimental results and clinical perspectives. Herz 2000; 25(8): 761–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Marmignon C, Chavanon O, Troccaz J. CASPER, a Computer ASsisted PERicardial puncture system: first clinical results. Comput Aided Surg 2005; 10(1): 15–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Barbe C, Carrat L, Chavanon O, et al. Computer-assisted pericardiac surgery. In: Computer assisted radiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996, pp 781–786

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chavanon O, Barbe C, Troccaz J, et al. Computer-assisted pericardial puncture: work in progress. Comput Aided Surg 1997; 2: 356–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Duvernoy O, Magnusson A. CT-guided pericardiocentesis. Acta Radiol 1996; 37(5): 775–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Meyer CA, White CS, Wu J, et al. Real-time CT. fluoroscopy: usefulness in thoracic drainage. AJR 1998; 171: 1097–1101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. White CS, Meyer CA, Templeton PA. CT fluoroscopy for thoracic interventional procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38: 303–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. White CS, Templeton PA, Hasday JD. CT-assisted transbronchial needle aspiration: usefulness of CT fluoroscopy. AJR 1997; 169: 393–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kirchner J, Kickuth R, Walz MV, et al. CTF-guided puncture of an unenhanced isodense liver lesion during continuous intravenous injection of contrast medium. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999; 22: 528–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bruning R, Muehlstaedt M, Becker C, et al. Computed tomography-fluoroscopy guided drainage of pericardial effusions: Experience in 11 cases. Invest Radiol 2002; 37: 328–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, et al. Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. AJR 1999; 173: 637–644

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Katada K, Kato R, Anno H, et al. Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology 1996; 200: 851–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM, et al. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology 1999; 212: 165–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Laurent F, Latrabe V, Vergier B, et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules smaller than 20 mm. Results with an automated 20-gauge coaxial cutting needle. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 281–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bungay HK, Berger J, Traill ZC, et al. Pneumothorax post CT-guided lung biopsy: a comparison between detection on chest radiographs and CT. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 1160–1163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, et al. CT Fluoroscopy- guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 1999; 212: 673–681

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cooper JP, Oliver RM, Currie P, et al. How do the clinical findings in patients with pericardial effusions influence the success of aspiration? Br Heart J 1995; 73: 351–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Tweddell JS, Zimmerman AN, Stone CM, Rokkas CK, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Cox JL. Pericardiocentesis guided by a pulse generator. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14(4): 1074–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine – Cardiology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Bernhard Maisch MD, FESC, FACC (Professor of Internal Medicine – Cardiology, Director)

  2. Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade University School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia

    Arsen D. Ristić MD, PhD, FESC (Associate Professor of Internal Medicine – Cardiology)

  3. Department of Cardiology Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade University School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia

    Petar M. Seferović MD, PhD, FESC, FACC (Professor of Internal Medicine – Cardiology)

  4. Diamond Health Care Centre, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, BC V5Z 1M9, Vancouver, Canada

    Teresa S. M. Tsang MD, FACC (Professor of Medicine)

Authors
  1. Bernhard Maisch MD, FESC, FACC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arsen D. Ristić MD, PhD, FESC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Petar M. Seferović MD, PhD, FESC, FACC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teresa S. M. Tsang MD, FACC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maisch, B., Ristić, A.D., Seferović, P.M., Tsang, T.S.M. (2011). Alternative Techniques for Pericardiocentesis. In: Interventional Pericardiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11335-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11335-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11334-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11335-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation