Skip to main content

“Evolutionary Store Atmospherics” – Designing with Evolution in Mind

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Psychology in the Business Sciences

Abstract

Environmental psychology research shows that natural environments and natural habitat qualities are better able to positively influence human functioning (e.g., stress reduction) than most common urban environments. Such positive psychological states are often interpreted as remnants of our species’ evolutionary history in natural environments. Nowadays a substantial part of the urban fabric is dedicated to commercial and business-related activities. Such environments however often lack those natural habitat qualities and elements, which have been found to promote positive psychological states. This chapter aims to demonstrate and illustrate the value of integrating such natural qualities into business-related environments, and specifically into retail environments. We coin this design strategy “Evolutionary Store Atmospherics” (ESA). The scope of this chapter is theoretical as well as practical. On the one hand, we provide an overview of the specific “ancestral” landscape elements and qualities that are found to have positive effects on human functioning. On the other hand, we discuss and illustrate how these key qualities can be integrated in store environments. Special attention is paid to situational factors that could interact with ESA design proposals, such as, for example, gender and type of shopping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Roger Ulrich has developed a similar model, coined the psycho-evolutionary framework (Ulrich, 1983, 1993). The “preferenda” that are part of this framework mostly overlap with the predictors of the Kaplans’ model.

  2. 2.

    Bell et al. (2005: 45) note that the relation between the four predictors and preference remains somewhat ambiguous: “Although the relative importance of each element is not clear, coherence and complexity may require only moderate levels in order to facilitate information processing, whereas the more legibility and mystery in a scene, the better in terms of preference judgements”.

  3. 3.

    This type of brain wave is associated with wakeful relaxation and is commonly measured by an Electroencephalograph (EEG).

  4. 4.

    This version of the savanna hypothesis should not be confused with Satoshi Kanazawa’s savanna principle (Kanazawa 2004), or with Dennis and McCall's (2005) savannah hypothesis.

  5. 5.

    It must be noted that, historically, skyscrapers were not primarily constructed to appeal to this sense of hazards, but arose because of real estate realities, i.e., they were cheaper to build.

References

  • Aggarwal P, McGill AL (2007) Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for the evaluation of anthromorphized products. J Consum Res 34:468–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken NE (1998a) Human cardiovascular response to the eye spot threat stimulus. Evol Cogn 4:51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken NE (1998b) The biological origins of art. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton J (1975) The experience of landscape. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton J (1990) The symbolism of habitat: an interpretation of landscape in the arts. University of Washington Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Areni CS, Kim D (1993) The influence of background music on shopping behaviour: classical versus top-forty music in a wine store. In: McAlister L, Rothschild ML (eds) Advances in consumer research. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, pp 336–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran S (1995) Causal constraints on categories and categorical constraints on biological reasoning across cultures. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack J (eds) Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 205–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin BJ, Darden WR (1996) Good and bad shopping vibes: spending and patronage satisfaction. J Bus Res 35:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M (1994) Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J Consum Res 20:644–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Balling JD, Falk JH (1982) Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environ Behav 14:5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar M, Neta M (2006) Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychol Sci 17:645–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar M, Neta M (2007) Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia 45:2191–2200

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar M, Neta M (2008) The proactive brain: using rudimentary information to make predictive judgments. J Consum Behav 7:319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett HC (2005) Adaptations to predators and prey. In: Buss DM (ed) The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 200–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell PA, Greene TC, Fisher JD, Baum A (2005) Environmental psychology, 5th edn. Harcourt College Publishers, Fort Worth

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellizzi JA, Crowley AE, Hasty RW (1983) The effects of colour in store design. J Retailing 59:21–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner MJ (1992) Servicescapes: the impact of psychical surroundings on customers and employees. J Marketing 56:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner J (2003) Three traditions of self-similarity in fourteenth and fifteenth century islamic geometric ornament. In: Sarhangi R, Sequin C (eds) ISAMA/Bridges 2003 conference proceedings Granada, Spain: University of Granada. www.bonner-design.com/downloads/Bonner-3017.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2009

  • Bovill C (1996) Fractal geometry in architecture and design. Birkhaüser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringslimark T, Hartig T, Patil G, Grindal G (2007) Psychological benefits of indoor plants in workplaces: putting experimental results into context. HortScience 42:581–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber R, Ruso B, Gadner J, Atzwanger K, Gruber S (2007) Evolutionary store design. How water, plants, animals and sight protection affect consumer behaviour. In: Thyne M, Deans KR, Gnoth J (eds) Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) conference 2007. University of Otago, Dunedin, pp 325–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav Brain Sci 12:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarazza A, Shelton JR (1998) Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. J Cogn Neurosci 10:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebat J, Gélinas-Chebat C, Therrien K (2008) Gender-related wayfinding time of mall shoppers. J Bus Res 61:1076–1082

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Spacapan S (1978) The aftereffects of stress: an attentional interpretation. Environ Psychol Nonver 3:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Coss RG (2003) The Role of evolved perceptual biases in art and design. In: Voland E, Grammer K (eds) Evolutionary aesthetics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 69–130

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Astous A (2000) Irritating aspects of the shopping environment. J Bus Res 49:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon & Schutser, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis C, McCall A (2005) The Savannah hypothesis of shopping. Bus Strat Rev 16:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Design Council (1997) Design in Britain 1997–98. Design Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eals M, Silverman I (1994) The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethol Sociobiol 15:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecuyer-Dab I, Robert M (2004) Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition 91:221–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt I (1989) Human ethology. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eroglu SA, Machleit KA (1990) An empirical examination of retail crowding: Antecedents and consequences. J Retailing 66:201–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans GW, McCoy JM (1998) When buildings don’t work: the role of architecture in human health. J Environ Psychol 18:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH, Balling JD (2010) Evolutionary influence on human landscape preference. Environ Behav 42:479–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MA, Shrout PE (2006) Children’s liking of landscape paintings as a function of their perceptions of prospect, refuge, and hazard. Environ Behav 38:373–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Fram E, Ajami R (1994) Globalization of markets and shopping stress: cross-country comparisons. Bus Horiz 37:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson BL, Levenson RW (1998) Positive emotions speed recovery from the cardiovascular sequelae of negative emotions. Cognition Emotion 12:191–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin SJ, Fitzgerald RW (1986) Sex differences in spatial ability: an evolutionary hypothesis and test. Am Nat 127:74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin SJ, Fitzgerald RW (1989) Sexual selection for spatial-learning ability. Anim Behav 37:322–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerhall CM, Purcell T, Taylor R (2004) Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. J Environ Psychol 24:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley KJ, Fessler DMT (2005) Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol Hum Behav 26:245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Han K-T (2007) Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference, and restorativeness. Environ Behav 39:529–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experience. Environ Behav 23:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol 23:109–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V (2010) Beyond Savanna: an evolutionary and environmental psychology approach to behavioral effects of nature scenery in green advertising. J Environ Psychol 30:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Hase B, Heerwagen J (2000) Phylogenetic design: a new approach for workplace environments. J Qual Participation 23:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland-Jones J, Rosario HH, Wilson P, McGuire TR (2005) An environmental approach to positive emotion: flowers. Evol Psychol 3:104–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen JH (2003) Bio-inspired design: what can we learn from nature? http://biomimicry.typepad.com/bioinspire/files/BioInspire.1-01.15.03.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2010

  • Heerwagen JH, Gregory B (2008) Biophilia and sensory aesthetics. In: Kellert SR, Heerwagen JH, Mador ML (eds) Biophilic design. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 227–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen JH, Orians GH (1993) Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, pp 138–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand G (1999) Origins of architectural pleasure. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook MB, Hirschmann EC (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. J Consum Res 9:132–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Joye Y (2007) Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the case of biophilic architecture. Rev Gen Psychol 11:305–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Joye Y, Willems K, Brengman M, Wolf K (2010) The effects of urban retail greenery on consumer experience: reviewing the evidence from a restorative perspective. Urban For Urban Greening 9:57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltcheva VD, Weitz BA (2006) When should a retailer create an exciting store environment? J Marketing 70:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa S (2004) The savanna principle. Manag decis econ 25:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1988) Perception and landscape: conceptions and misconceptions. In: Nasar J (ed) Environmental aesthetics: theory, research, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1992) Environmental preference in a knowledge seeking knowledge using organism. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adaptive mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 535–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Katcher AH, Wilkins G (1993) Dialogue with animals: its nature and culture. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington D.C., pp 173–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (2005) Building for life: designing & understanding the human-nature connection. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR, Heerwagen J, Mador M (2008) Biophilic design: the theory, science, and bringing buildings to life. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1973) Atmosphere as a marketing tool. J Retailing 49:48–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson CL, Aronoff J, Sarinopoulos IC, Zhu DC (2009) Recognizing threat: a simple geometric shape activates neural circuitry for threat detection. J Cogn Neurosci 21:1523–1535

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder H, Carbon CC (2005) Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Appl Cognitive Psychol 19:603–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DT, Takarae Y, Miner A, Keil FC (2001) Efficient visual search by category: specifying the features that mark the difference between artifacts and animals in preattentive vision. Percept Psychophys 63:676–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (2005) Challenges of interdisciplinarity for forest management and landscape perception research. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds) From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education, and application. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipowski ZJ (1970) The conflict of Buridan’s ass or some dilemmas of affluence: The theory of attractive stimulus overload. Am J Psychiatry 127:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr VI, Pearson-Mims CH, Goodwin GK (1996) Interior plants may improve worker productivity and reduce stress in a windowless environment. J Environ Hortic 14:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttik J (2000) The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan 48:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons E (1983) Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environ Behav 15:487–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Mador ML (2008) Water, biophilic design, and the built environment. In: Kellert SR, Heerwagen JH, Mador ML (eds) Biophilic design. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mano H (1999) The influence of pre-existing negative affect on store purchase intentions. J Retailing 75:149–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Weisberg J (2003) Neural foundations for understanding social and mechanical concepts. Cogn Neuropsychol 20:575–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell S, Kover A (2003) Negative affect: the dark side of retailing. J Bus Res 56:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick PJ (2002) Retail marketing. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Russell JA (1974) An approach to environmental psychology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikiten T, Salingaros N, Yu H (2000) Pavements as embodiments of meaning for a fractal mind. Nexus Netw J 2:41–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G (2009) Spent: sex, evolution, and consumer behavior. Viking Adult, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineka S, Öhman A (2002) Phobias and preparedness: the selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biol Psychiatry 52:927–937

    Google Scholar 

  • New J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2007a) Category-Specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16598–16603

    Google Scholar 

  • New J, Krasnow M, Truxaw D, Gaulin SJC (2007b) Spatial adaptations for plant foraging: women excel and calories count. Proc R Soc Ser B Biol Sci 274:2679–2684

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaks S (2000) The influence of the musicscape within service environments. J Serv Mark 14:539–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (1980) Habitat selection: general theory and applications to human behaviour. In: Lockard JS (ed) The evolution of human social behaviour. Elsevier, New York, pp 49–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH (2001) An evolutionary perspective on aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2. http://www.apa.org/divisions/div10/ articles/orians.html. Accessed 5 July 2009

  • Orians GH, Heerwagen JH (1992) Evolved responses to landscapes. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 555–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S-H, Mattson RH, Kim E (2004) Pain tolerance effects of ornamental plants in a simulated hospital patient room. Acta Hortic 639:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts RB (1998) Environmental hypotheses of hominin evolution. Yearb Phys Anthropol 41:93–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakison DH, Derringer J (2008) Do infants possess an evolved spider-detection mechanism. Cognition 107:381–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruso B, Renninger L, Atzwanger K (2003) Landscape perception as evolutionary foundation of aesthetics. In: Voland E, Grammer K (eds) Evolutionary aesthetics. Springer, Berlin, pp 279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad G (2007) The evolutionary bases of consumption. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamps A (2006) Literature review of prospect and refuge theory: the first 214 references. http://ieq.home.att.net/LitReviewProspectAndRefuge.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2010

  • Sullivan M, Adcock D (2002) Retail marketing. Thomson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons D (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus PA, Everett PB (1995) The consumer retail search process: a conceptual model and research agenda. J Acad Market Sci 23:106–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorova A, Asakawa S, Aikoh T (2004) Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape urban plan 69:403–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Turley LW, Milliman RE (2000) Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: a review of the experimental evidence. J Bus Res 49:193–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1981) Natural versus urban scenes – Some psychophysiological effects. Environ Behav 13:523–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Human behavior and environment, vol 6. Plenum Press, New York, pp 85–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1984) Views through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS (1993) Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In: Kellert SR, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, pp 73–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez R, Rodriguez-Del Bosque I, Diaz AM, Ruiz AV (2001) Service quality in supermarket retailing: identifying critical service experiences. J Retailing Consum Serv 8:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JC, Eaton JP (1994) Service environments: the effect of quality and decorative style on emotions, expectations, and attributions. In: Acrol R, Mitchell A (eds) Enhancing knowledge development in marketing. American Marketing Association, Chicago, pp 333–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia: the human bond with other species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamane K, Kawashima M, Fujishige N, Yoshida M (2004) Effects of interior horticultural activities with potted plants on human physiological and emotional status. In: Relf D, Kwack BH, Hicklenton P (eds) A proceedings of the XXVI international horticultural congress expanding roles for horticulture in improving human well-being and life quality. ISHS, Toronto/Leuven, pp 37–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Writing this paper was supported by the Research Program of the Scientific Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), project G.0446.08. Many thanks to Tjerk van de Wetering of BYTR for his assistance with finding visual work illustrating ESA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yannick Joye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joye, Y., Poels, K., Willems, K. (2011). “Evolutionary Store Atmospherics” – Designing with Evolution in Mind. In: Saad, G. (eds) Evolutionary Psychology in the Business Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92784-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics