This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G. (1982a): Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters 49, 1804–1807.
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G. (1982b): Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm Gedankenexperiment. A new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Physical Review Letters 49, 91–94.
Atmanspacher, H., Bach, M., Filk, J., Kornmeier, J. and Römer, H. (2008): Cognitive time scales in a Necker-Zeno model for bistable perception. Manuscript available at www.igpp.de/english/tda/pdf/neckerzeno.pdf
Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T. and Römer, H. (2004): Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception. Biological Cybernetics 90, 33–40.
Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T. and Römer, H. (2006): Weak quantum theory: Formal framework and selected applications. In: Adenier, G., Khrennikov, A., and Nieuwenhuizen, T.M. (eds.), Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations 3. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 34–46.
Atmanspacher, H., Römer, H. and Walach, H. (2002): Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations of Physics 32, 379–406.
Bell, J.S. (1966): On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 447–452.
Blake, R. and Logothetis, N.K. (2001): Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3, 1–11.
Brascamp, J.W., Ee, R. van, Pestman, W.R. and Berg, A.V. van den (2005): Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5, 287–298.
Carter, O.L., Presti, D.E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G.B. and Pettigrew, J.D. (2005): Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks. Current Biology 15, R412–R413.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935): Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review 47, 777–780.
Franck, G. and Atmanspacher, H. (2008): A proposed relation between intensity of presence and duration of nowness. This volume.
James, W. (1890a): The Principles of Psychology. Volume One. Holt, New York.
James, W. (1890b): The Principles of Psychology. Volume Two. Holt, New York.
Kornmeier, J., Ehm, W., Bigalke, H. and Bach, M. (2007): Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: How interstimulus-interval durations affect reversal dynamics and ERPs. Psychophysiology 44, 552–560.
Kruse, P. and Stadler, M. (eds.) (1995): Ambiguity in Mind and Nature: Multistable Cognitive Phenomena. Springer, Berlin.
Leggett, A.J. and Garg, A. (1985): Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? Physical Review Letters 54, 857–860.
Long, G.M. and Toppino, T.C. (2004): Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin 130, 748–768.
Mahler, G. (1994): Temporal Bell inequalities: A journey to the limits of “consistent histories”. In: Atmanspacher, H. and Dalenoort, G.J. (eds.), Inside Versus Outside. Endo- and Exo-Concepts of Observation and Knowledge in Physics, Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 195–205.
Meng, M. and Tong, F. (2004): Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 4, 539–551.
Misra, B. and Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1977): The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics 18, 756–763.
Pöppel, E. (1997): A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 1, 56–61.
Sudarshan, E.C.G. (1983) Perception of quantum systems. In: Merwe, A. van der (ed.), Old and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology. Plenum, New York, pp. 457–467.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., Römer, H. (2009). Complementarity in Bistable Perception. In: Atmanspacher, H., Primas, H. (eds) Recasting Reality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85198-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85198-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85197-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85198-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)