Skip to main content

Endoanal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Chapter
Imaging Pelvic Floor Disorders

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 1509 Accesses

Abstract

Disorders of the external and/or internal anal sphincter muscles are a major cause of fecal incontinence. External anal sphincter insufficiency is caused by a defect of the muscle or by damage to the pudendal nerve, resulting in atrophy of the external anal sphincter with subsequent weakness. Childbirth is the main cause of fecal incontinence in women. Both the muscle itself as well as the pudendal nerve can be damaged during delivery. The internal anal sphincter can also be damaged in combination with the external anal sphincter when a large rupture of the anal sphincter occurs. Isolated internal anal sphincter defects are mainly caused by anorectal surgery (anal sphincter trauma) (Kamm 1994).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartram CI (2003) Ultrasound. In: Bartram CI, DeLancey JOL (eds) Imaging pelvic floor disorders. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beets-Tan RG, Morren GL, Beets GL et al (2001) Measurement of anal sphincter muscles: endoanal US, endoanal MR imaging, or phased-array MR imaging? A study with healthy volunteers. Radiology 220:81–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briel JW, Stoker J, Rociu E et al (1999) External anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging adversely affects continence after sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 86:1322–1327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briel JW, Zimmerman DD, Stoker J et al (2000) Relationship between sphincter morphology on endoanal MRI and histopathological aspects of the external anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:87–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cazemier M, Terra MP, Stoker J et al (2006) Atrophy and defects detection of the external anal sphincter: comparison between three-dimensional anal endosonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 49:20–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • deSouza NM, Puni R, Kmiot WA et al (1995) MRI of the anal sphincter. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:745–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • deSouza NM, Hall AS, Puni R et al (1996) High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using a dedicated endoanal coil. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings. Dis Colon Rectum 39:926–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutekom M, Terra MP, Dijkgraaf MG et al (2006) Patients’ perception of tests in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Br J Radiol 79:94–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A et al (1999) AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:735–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M et al (2007a) Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:783–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobben AC, Terra MP, Slors JF et al (2007b) Comparison of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and endoanal ultrasonography in the depiction of external anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinent patients. Radiology 242:463–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobben AC, Terra MP, Deutekom M et al (2007c) The role of endoluminal imaging in clinical outcome of overlapping anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W70–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frudinger A, Halligan S, Bartram CI et al (2002) Female anal sphincter: Age-related differences in asymptomatic volunteers with high-frequency endoanal US. Radiology 224:417–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchsjäger MH, Maier AG (2003) Imaging fecal incontinence. Eur J Radiol 47:108–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Sultan A, Rottenberg G et al (1995) Endosonography of the anal sphincters in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:79–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamm MA (1994) Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet 344:730–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malouf AJ, Halligan S, Williams AB et al (2001) Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for endoanal MRI in fecal incontinence. Abdom Imaging 26:76–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S et al (2000) Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:741–745

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rociu E, Stoker J, Zwamborn AW et al (1999a) Endoanal MR imaging of the anal sphincter in fecal incontinence. Radiographics 19:S171–S177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ et al (1999b) Fecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 212:453–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ et al (2000) Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age-and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 217:395–401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker J, Hussain SM, van Kempen D et al (1996) Endoanal coil in MR imaging of anal fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:360–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker J, Rociu E, Zwamborn AW et al (1999) Endoluminal MR imaging of the rectum and anus: technique, applications, and pitfalls. Radiographics 19:383–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker J, Rociu E, Wiersma TG et al (2000) Imaging of anorectal disease. Br J Surg 87:10–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al (1993) Anal-sphincter isruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC et al (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 81:463–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terra MP, Stoker J (2006) Fecal incontinence: Endoanal ultrasonography and MR imaging. In: Santoro GA, Di Falco G (eds) Benign anorectal diseases: diagnosis with endoanal and endorectal ultrasonography and new treatment options. Springer, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Terra MP, Beets-Tan RG, van der Hulst VPM et al (2005) Evaluating anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: Endoanal MR imaging versus external phased array MR imaging. Radiology 236:886–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terra MP, Deutekom M, Beets-Tan RG et al (2006a) External anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal MRI in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1149–1159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terra MP, Beets-Tan RG, van der Hulst VPM (2006b) MR imaging in evaluating atrophy of the external anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:991–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1997) Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 349:612–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AB, Bartram CI, Modhwadia D et al (2001) Endocoil magnetic resonance imaging quantification of external anal sphincter atrophy. Br J Surg 88:853–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West RL, Dwarkasing S, Briel JW et al (2005) Can three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography detect external anal sphincter atrophy? A comparison with endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:328–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Bruijne-Dobben, A.C., Stoker, J. (2008). Endoanal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: Imaging Pelvic Floor Disorders. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71968-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71968-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71966-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71968-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics