Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2711))

Abstract

We investigate a simple modal logic of probability with a unary modal operator expressing that a proposition is more probable than its negation. Such an operator is not closed under conjunction, and its modal logic is therefore non-normal. Within this framework we study the relation of probability with other modal concepts: belief and action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning about knowledge and probability. Journal of the ACM 41, 340–367 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamblin, C.: The modal ‘probably’. Mind 68, 234–240 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess, J.P.: Probability logic. J. of Symbolic Logic 34, 264–274 (1969)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Walley, P., Fine, T.L.: Varieties of modal (classificatory) and comparative probability. Synthese 41, 321–374 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Halpern, J., Rabin, M.: A logic to reason about likelihood. Artificial Intelligence J. 32, 379–405 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Halpern, J., McAllester, D.: Likelihood, probability, and knowledge. Computational Intelligence 5, 151–160 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fattorosi-Barnaba, M., de Caro, F.: Graded modalities I. Studia Logica 44, 197–221 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Hoek, W.: On the semantics of graded modalities. J. of Applied Nonclassical Logics (JANCL) 2 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hajek, P.: Metamathematics of fuzzy logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Godo, L., Hajek, P., Esteva, F.: A fuzzy modal logic for belief functions. In: Proc. 17th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), pp. 723–732 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fariñas del Cerro, L., Herzig, A.: A modal analysis of possibility theory. In: Kruse, R., Siegel, P. (eds.) ECSQAU 1991 and ECSQARU 1991. LNCS, vol. 548, pp. 58–62. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fariñas del Cerro, L., Herzig, A.: A modal analysis of possibility theory (invited paper). In: Jorrand, P., Kelemen, J. (eds.) FAIR 1991. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 535, pp. 11–18. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chellas, B.: Modal logic: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hintikka, J.K.K.: Knowledge and belief. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harel, D.: Dynamic logic. In: Gabbay, D.M., Günthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. II, pp. 497–604. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Herzig, A., Lang, J., Longin, D., Polacsek, T.: A logic for planning under partial observability. In: Proc. Nat. (US) Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000), Austin, Texas (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herzig, A., Longin, D.: Sensing and revision in a modal logic of belief and action. In: van Harmelen, F. (ed.) Proc. ECAI 2002, pp. 307–311. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, S., Pagnucco, M., Lespérance, Y., Levesque, H.J.: Iterated belief change in the situation calculus. In: Proc. KR 2000, pp. 527–538 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reiter, R.: The frame problem in the situation calculus: A simple solution (sometimes) and a completeness result for goal regression. In: Lifschitz, V. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy, pp. 359–380. Academic Press, San Diego (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Levesque, H.J., Reiter, R., Lespérance, Y., Lin, F., Scherl, R.: GOLOG: A logic programming language for dynamic domains. J. of Logic Programming (1997) special issue on reasoning about action and change (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Herzig, A., Longin, D. (2003). On Modal Probability and Belief. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2711. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40494-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45062-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics