Skip to main content

Transformations from Imprecise to Precise Probabilities

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2711))

Abstract

Several known procedures transforming an imprecise probability into a precise one focus on special classes of imprecise probabilities, like belief functions and 2–monotone capacities, while not addressing the more general case of coherent imprecise probabilities, as defined by Walley. In this paper we first analyze some of these transformations, exploring the possibility of applying them to more general families of uncertainty measures and evidencing their limitations. In particular, the pignistic probability transformation is investigated from this perspective. We then propose a transformation that can be applied to coherent imprecise probabilities, discussing its properties and the way it can be used in the case of partial assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baroni, P., Vicig, P.: An uncertainty interchange format for multi-agent systems based on imprecise probabilities. In: Proc. of IPMU 2000, Madrid, E, pp. 1027–1034 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Walley, P.: Measures of uncertainty in expert systems. Artificial Intelligence 83, 1–58 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chateauneuf, A., Jaffray, J.-Y.: Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Möbius inversion. Mathematical Social Sciences 17, 263–283 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory. Plenum Press, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Rota, G.C.: On the foundations of combinatorial theory. I. Theory of Möbius functions. Z. für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 2, 340–368 (1964)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Vicig, P.: An algorithm for imprecise conditional probability assessments in expert systems. In: Proc. of IPMU 1996, Granada, E, pp. 61–66 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sandri, S.: On possibility/probability transformations. In: Lowen, R., Roubens, M. (eds.) Fuzzy Logic - State of the art, pp. 103–112. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Voorbraak, F.: A computationally efficient approximation of Dempster-Shafer theory. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 30, 525–536 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Consonant approximations of belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 4, 419–449 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernandez, R., Recasens, J.: On possibilistic and probabilistic approximations of unrestricted belief functions based on the concept of fuzzy T-preorder. Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10, 185–200 (2002)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Smets, P.: Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty. In: Henrion, M., Shachter, R.D., Kanal, L.N., Lemmer, J.F. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5, pp. 29–39. North Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klir, G.J., Wierman, M.J.: Uncertainty-based information. Elements of generalized information theory. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Baroni, P., Vicig, P.: On the conceptual status of belief functions with respect to coherent lower probabilities. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.) ECSQARU 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2143, pp. 328–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Klir, G.: Uncertainty and information measures for imprecise probabilities: an overview. In: Proc. of ISIPTA, Ghent, B (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffray, J.-Y.: On the maximum-entropy probability which is consistent with a convex capacity. Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 3, 27–33 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Denneberg, D.: Non-additive measure and integral. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali, H.D., Shetty, C.M.: Nonlinear programming, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York(1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baroni, P., Vicig, P. (2003). Transformations from Imprecise to Precise Probabilities. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2711. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45062-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40494-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45062-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics