Skip to main content

Capturing and Reflecting for Change: The Generation of Impact

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading and Sources of Inspiration

  • Cook, T., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2017). Special issue: The conceptualisation and articulation of impact: Hopes, expectations and challenges for the participatory paradigm. Educational Action Research, 25(4), 467–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, S. (2017). Making space for co-produced research ‘impact’: Learning from a participatory action research case study. Area, 49, 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2018). Position Paper 3: What is Impact in Participatory Health Research? www.icphr.org

References

  • Abma, T. A. (2006). The practice and politics of responsive evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abma, T. (2018). Responsive evaluation. In B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (pp. 1427–1430). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n594.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allman, P. (2009). ‘Paulo Freire’s contributions to radical adult education’ in Darder, Boyd, R.D. and Myers, J.G. [[]] (1988 [[]]) ‘Transformative education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 7(4), 261–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D. (1997). Lessons learned in evaluation over the past 25 years. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A resource book (pp. 30–52). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (2006). Collaborative action research for development and evaluation: A good fit or the road to myopia? Evaluation, 12(4), 418–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T., & Inglis, P. (2009). Making our own decisions: Researching the process of ‘being informed’ with people with learning difficulties. Research Ethics Review, 5(2), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T., Atkin, H., & Wilcockson, J. (2018). Participatory research into inclusive practice: Improving services for people with long term neurological conditions. FQS, 19(1), Art. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (2002). Reinventing Paulo Freire: A pedagogy of love. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1998). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogy of hope. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2000). The third way and its critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabov, V. (1997). The many facets of transformative learning theory and practice.In P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice. New directions for adult and continuing education 74 (pp 89–96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C. (2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In I. Shaw, J. Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation (pp. 118–140). Los Angelos: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S., & Janamian, T. (2016). Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study. The Milbank Quarterly, 94(2), 392–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. C. (2008). The development of critical being? Reflection and reflexivity in an action learning programme for health promotion practitioners in the Netherlands. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 5(3), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain. R., Askins. K., Banks, S., Cook, T., Crawford, G., Crookes, L., Darby, S., Heslop, J., Holden, A., Houston, M., Jeffes, J., Lambert, Z., McGlen, L., McGlynn, C., Ozga, J., Raynor, R., Robinson, Y., Shaw, S., Stewart, C., & Vanderhoven, D. (2015). Mapping Alternative Impact: Alternative approaches to impact from co-produced research. Produced as part of the N8 / ESRC research programme knowledge that matters: Realising the potential of Co-production. https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/beacon/MappingAlternativeImpactsummaryfinal.pdf

  • Raţiu, L., Chirică, S., & Lenuța Rus, C. (2014). Participatory evaluation: An intended catalyst to learning within university. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 140–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Herrera, J., Springett, J., & Kagan, C. (2009). Critical connections between participatory evaluation, organizational learning and intentional change in pluralistic organizations. Evaluation, 15(3), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2015). Action research with/against impact. Educational Action Research, 23(3), 309–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. (2002). Managers, spectators and citizens: Where does “theory” come from in action research? In C. Day, J. Elliott, B. Somekh, & R. Winter (Eds.), Theory and practice in action research: Some international perspectives (pp. 27–44). Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abma, T. et al. (2019). Capturing and Reflecting for Change: The Generation of Impact. In: Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93191-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93191-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93190-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93191-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics