Skip to main content

Questions on Assessing the Evidence Linking Religion/Spirituality to Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Why Religion and Spirituality Matter for Public Health

Part of the book series: Religion, Spirituality and Health: A Social Scientific Approach ((RELSPHE,volume 2))

Abstract

This chapter describes background and methods used in a set of 13 empirical review chapters contained in Part I of this volume (chapters “Model of Individual Health Effects from Religion/Spirituality: Supporting Evidence”, “Religious/Spiritual Effects on Physical Morbidity and Mortality”, Social and Community-Level Factors in Health Effects from Religion/Spirituality”, “Social Identity and Discrimination in Religious/Spiritual Influences on Health”, “Environmental Health Sciences, Religion, and Spirituality”, “Infectious Diseases, Religion, and Spirituality”, “Public Health Nutrition, Religion, and Spirituality”, “Maternal/Child Health, Religion, and Spirituality”, “Health Policy and Management, Religion, and Spirituality”, “Public Health Education, Promotion, and Intervention: Relevance of Religion and Spirituality”, “Mental Health, Religion, and Spirituality”, “Clinical Practice, Religion, and Spirituality” and “Weighing the Evidence: What is Revealed by 100+ Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Religion/Spirituality and Health?”).

Each of these thirteen review chapers focuses on relations between religious and spiritual (R/S) factors and health variables. This present chapter addresses the following 12 questions:

  1. 1.

    What common methods were employed across reviews?

  2. 2.

    What was done if systematic reviews were unavailable?

  3. 3.

    How do the reviews cover qualitative findings?

  4. 4.

    What are strengths and weaknesses of utilizing systematic reviews as “building blocks”?

  5. 5.

    How are religion and spirituality defined?

  6. 6.

    How do the reviews interpret findings that religious/spiritual factors have both favorable and unfavorable associations with health variables?

  7. 7.

    What about ethics?

  8. 8.

    How do religion and spirituality express themselves as living forces?

  9. 9.

    How many “dimensions” do religion and spirituality possess?

  10. 10.

    Who is religious/spiritual, and in what ways?

  11. 11.

    Were any public health subfields omitted?

  12. 12.

    How do religion/spirituality and stress “get into the body”?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At least one R/S-health study has been conducted in Antarctica, documenting stable mental health but a depletion over time of spiritual coping resources among 23 winter-over personnel (Joshi et al. 1998).

  2. 2.

    For example, Adler et al. (1994), in discussing socioeconomic gradients, wrote that “The concept of individual control over existing life circumstances… might be a higher order variable that synthesizes or renders coherent a number of the factors reviewed here” (p. 22), also noting that “In a few diseases such as malignant melanoma and breast cancer, a reverse gradient is found…. study of the variation in the direction and degree of association of SES with specific diseases across time and countries would be valuable” (p. 16).

  3. 3.

    As problematized here, the explanatory gap resides at an intermediate level of abstraction: The needed theoretical explanation is at a lower level of abstraction than theological questions of theodicy (explanations for the existence of evil), but at a higher level of abstraction than attributing, for example, worse outcomes in specific religious groups to specific group-level factors (e.g., religious doctrines mandating avoidance of blood transfusions or other medical procedures).

  4. 4.

    Chapters that mention this dynamic model besides Chapter “Social and Community-Level Factors in Health Effects from Religion/Spirituality” include Chapter “Model of Individual Health Effects from Religion/Spirituality: Supporting Evidence” (some unfavorable health behaviors, such as obesity), Chapter “Social Identity and Discrimination in Religious/Spiritual Influences on Health” (mixed discrimination associations), Chapter “Environmental Health Sciences, Religion, and Spirituality” (mixed environmental attitude/practice associations), and Chapter “Health Policy and Management, Religion, and Spirituality” (mixed links with healthcare utilization).

  5. 5.

    Other R/S dimensions were entered unabbreviated into the Handbook appendices, and therefore do not appear in Table 1. Several reviews of religious/spiritual measures and some annotated collections are available, although none is exhaustive (de Jager Meezenbroek et al. 2012; Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group 1999; Hill and Hood 1999; Kapuscinski and Masters 2010; Lewis 2008; Lucchetti et al. 2013; Monod et al. 2011; Selman et al. 2011a, b).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doug Oman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oman, D. (2018). Questions on Assessing the Evidence Linking Religion/Spirituality to Health. In: Oman, D. (eds) Why Religion and Spirituality Matter for Public Health. Religion, Spirituality and Health: A Social Scientific Approach, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73966-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73966-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73965-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73966-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics