Skip to main content

Restoring Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry: The Reach of Qualitative Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problem Behavior Theory and the Social Context

Part of the book series: Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development ((ARAD))

  • 554 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the openness of the post-Positivism climate to engagement with ethnographic or qualitative method in social inquiry. It explores the main reasons for the historic move away from a strict positivist approach, a consequence largely of a pervasive sense of disappointment in its failure to yield a rich account of individual personality and of social life. It argues for the fundamental epistemological commonality of quantitative and qualitative method, both involving hermeneutic interpretation. Issues in the philosophy of science are discussed, especially the necessity to assume an empirical world, generally denied by the post-modernists, in order to establish validity, and the importance of acknowledging subjectivity in social science.

Reprinted with permission from:

Jessor, R. (1996). Chapter 1: “Ethnographic methods in contemporary perspective.” In R. Jessor, A. Colby & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 3–14). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. (1992). From causes to events: Notes on narrative positivism. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(4), 428–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1996). The epistemology of qualitative research. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 53–71). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock Jr., H. M. (1984). Basic dilemmas in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1986). Science’s social system of validity-enhancing collective belief change and the problems of the social sciences. In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1996). Can we overcome worldview incommensurability/relativity in trying to understand the other? In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 153–172). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D. (1984). Adult development and social theory: A paradigmatic reappraisal. American Sociological Review, 49(1), 100–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1990). The spaces of postmodernism: Reading Plummer on Blumer. Symbolic Interaction, 13(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1996). The epistemological crisis in the human disciplines: Letting the old do the work of the new. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 127–151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (1992). What’s wrong with ethnography? Methodological explorations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., Colby, A., & Shweder, R. A. (Eds.). (1996). Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., & Bergman, L. R. (1988). Individual and variable-based approaches to longitudinal research on early risk factors. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Studies of psychosocial risk: The power of longitudinal data (pp. 45–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. P., & Varenne, H. (1996). Culture, development, disability. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 101–126). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1996). Missing persons: Recovering developmental stories/histories. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 73–99). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1990). Staying in the empirical world: Symbolic interactionism and postmodernism—A response to Denzin. Symbolic Interaction, 13(2), 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1964). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, K. (1967). Experimental social psychology: Some sober questions about some frivolous values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(2), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1996). True ethnography: The lore, the law, and the lure. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 15–52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisner, T. S. (1996). Why ethnography should be the most important method in the study of human development. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 305–324). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Jessor .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jessor, R. (2017). Restoring Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry: The Reach of Qualitative Methods. In: Problem Behavior Theory and the Social Context . Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57885-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics