Abstract
This chapter is an exegesis on the concept of the perceived environment and a test of its role in accounting for variation in adolescent problem behavior. The multiple environments in which an adolescent is simultaneously embedded are ordered along a dimension of explanatory or causal closeness to action from distal to proximal. Most distal is the physical/geographic environment; closer is the demographic environment; still closer is the social structural environment; and closest is the perceived environment, the environment that is experienced and that has meaning for the actor. It is argued that behavior is most invariant with the perceived environment. Data from a local study of over 400 high school youth and from a national sample study of over 13,000 similarly aged youth were presented. Results showed that, while almost no variance in adolescent problem behavior was accounted for by the set of (distal) demographic variables, substantial amounts of variance were accounted for by the (proximal) perceived environment variables. The importance of engaging the perceived environment in behavioral science research is strongly supported.
Reprinted with permission from:
Jessor, R. (1981). Chapter 19: “The perceived environment in psychological theory and research.” In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 297–317). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ball, D. W. (1972). ‘The definition of situation’: Some theoretical and methodological consequences of taking W. I. Thomas seriously. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2(1), 61–82.
Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344–358.
Blumer, H. (1966). Sociological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 71(5), 535–544.
Bridgman, P. W. (1959). The way things are. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272.
Cartwright, D. (1978). Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 34(4), 168–180.
Cassirer, E. (1953). An essay on man. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. (Original publication in 1944).
Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1978). Adolescent problem drinking: Psychosocial correlates in a national sample study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 39(9), 1506–1524.
Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 1026–1048.
Finney, J. W. (1979). Friends’ interests: A cluster-analytic study of college student peer environments, personality, and behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 8(3), 299–315.
Gibson, J. J. (1960). The concept of the stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist, 15(11), 694–703.
Jessor, R. (1956). Phenomenological personality theories and the data language of psychology. Psychological Review, 63(3), 173–180.
Jessor, R. (1958). The problem of reductionism in psychology. Psychological Review, 65(3), 170–178.
Jessor, R. (1961). Issues in the phenomenological approach to personality. Journal of Individual Psychology, 17(1), 27–38.
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1973). The perceived environment in behavioral science: Some conceptual issues and some illustrative data. American Behavioral Scientist, 16(6), 801–828.
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic.
Jessor, R., Graves, T. D., Hanson, R. C., & Jessor, S. L. (1968). Society, personality, and deviant behavior: A study of a tri-ethnic community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Reprinted by Krieger Publishing Co., 645 New York Avenue, Huntington, N.Y., 1975.)
Kessel, F. S. (1969). The philosophy of science as proclaimed and science as practiced: “Identity” or “dualism”? American Psychologist, 24(11), 999–1005.
Kohn, M. L. (1976). The interaction of social class and other factors in the etiology of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133(2), 177–180.
Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1973). Occupational experience and psychological functioning: An assessment of reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review, 38(1), 97–118.
Lewin, K. (1951a). Defining the “field at a given time”. In D. P. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. New York: Harper.
Lewin, K. (1951b). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252–283.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (1974). Adolescent personality development and historical change, 1970-1972. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 39(1., serial no. 154), 1–80.
Rachal, J. V., Williams, J. R., Brehm, M. L., Cavanaugh, B., Moore, R. P., & Eckerman, W. C. (1975). A national study of adolescent drinking behavior, attitudes, and correlates.: (NTIS Report No. PB-246-002, pp. 1-159). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
Rachal, J. V., Hubbard, R. L., Williams, J. R., & Tuchfeld, B. S. (1976). Drinking levels and problem drinking among junior and senior high school students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 37(11), 1751–1761.
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3) (pp. 184–256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rose, A. M. (Ed.). (1962). Human behavior and social processes: An interactionist approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rotter, J. B. (1955). The role of the psychological situation in determining the direction of human behavior. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 245–268). Lincoln, TX: University of Nebraska Press.
Sells, S. B. (1963). An interactionist looks at the environment. American Psychologist, 18(11), 696–702.
Stryker, S. (1977). Developments in “two social psychologies”: Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 40(2), 145–160.
Thomas, W. I. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wilson, T. P. (1970). Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation. American Sociological Review, 35(4), 697–710.
Zener, K. (1958). The significance of experience of the individual for the science of psychology. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Volume II, concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Acknowledgment
Preparation of this chapter was supported by Grant No. AA03745-01, R. Jessor, principal investigator. Support for the data collection was provided by Grant No. AA-00232 and Contract No. ADM 281-75-0028.1 am grateful to Dr. John Donovan for his contribution in carrying out the analyses of the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jessor, R. (2017). The Perceived Environment and the Psychological Situation. In: Problem Behavior Theory and the Social Context . Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57885-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57885-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57884-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57885-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)