Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Lay Beliefs on the Justice Motive

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Science of Lay Theories

  • 2365 Accesses

Abstract

Justice is one of the central values in people’s lives. Being treated fairly and treating each other with respect are important principles for many. Yet, in everyday life people are confronted with injustice and innocent victims on a regular basis. Reactions toward victims can range from going to great lengths to help or support the victims to harsh negative reactions often resulting in blaming victims for what happened to them. This chapter describes how lay theories of justice influence our responses toward victims in particular and social justice in general. We review a range of both negative reactions, such as victim blaming, and positive reactions, such as helping and immanent justice reasoning, and discuss important psychological processes underlying these reactions.

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere

Martin Luther King, Jr., (1963)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2

  • Bal, M. (2014). Making sense of injustice: Benign and derogatory reactions to innocent victims. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2010). The role of perpetrator similarity in reactions toward innocent victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 957–969. doi:10.1002/ejsp.668

  • Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2012). Blaming for a better future: Future orientation and associated intolerance of personal uncertainty lead to harsher reactions toward innocent victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 835–844. doi:10.1177/0146167212442970

  • Bal, M., & van den Bos, K. (2015). Putting the “I” and “Us” in justice: Derogatory and benevolent reactions toward innocent victims in self-focused and other-focused individuals. Social Justice Research, 28, 274–292. doi:10.1007/s11211-015-0249-3

  • Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2016). On human motivation and coping with threats to one’s worldview: Transforming victim blaming into helping of innocent victims. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 282–316). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. (2001). Philosophical ethics: An introduction to moral philosophy (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bègue, L., Charmoillaux, M., Cochet, J., Cury, C., & De Suremain, F. (2008). Altruistic behavior and the bidimensional just world belief. The American Journal of Psychology, 121, 47–56. doi:10.2307/20445443

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., & Nicol, J. E. (2006). The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1646–1658. doi:10.1177/0146167206292236

  • Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., Harvey, A. J., & Dawtry, R. J. (2014). Immanent justice reasoning: Theory, research, and current directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 105–161. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00002-0

  • Chaiken, A. L., & Darley, J. M. (1973). Victim or perpetrator: Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 268–275. doi:10.1037/h0033948

  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. doi:10.1177/0146167299025002007

  • Cohen, R. L. (Ed.). (1986). Justice: Views from the social sciences. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (2016). Restorative justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 257–272). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2001). The effects of belief in a just world and victim’s innocence on secondary victimization, judgements of justice and deservingness. Social Justice Research, 14, 327–342. doi:10.1023/A:1014324125095

  • Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim’s innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.010

  • DePalma, M. T., Madey, S. F., Tillman, T. C., & Wheeler, J. (1999). Perceived patient responsibility and belief in a just world affect helping. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 131–137. doi:10.1207/S15324834BA210205

  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x

  • Finkel, N. J. (2000). But it’s not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 898–952. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.6.4.898

  • Folger, R. (Ed.). (1984). The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7

  • Gaucher, D., Hafer, C. L., Kay, A. C., & Davidenko, N. (2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday undeserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109–118. doi:10.1177/0146167209351701

  • Hafer, C. L. (2000a). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073. doi:10.1177/01461672002611004

  • Hafer, C. L. (2000b). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165–173. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.165

  • Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128

  • Hafer, C. L., & Gosse, L. (2011). Predicting alternative strategies for preserving a belief in a just world: The case of repressive coping style. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 730–739. doi:10.1002/ejsp.807

  • Hafer, C. L., & Rubel, A. N. (2015). The why and how of defending belief in a just world. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 41–96. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2014.09.001

  • Hafer, C. L., & Sutton, R. (2016). Belief in a just world. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. J., Callan, M. J., & Matthews, W. J. (2014). How much does effortful thinking underlie observers’ reactions to victimization? Social Justice Research, 27, 175–208. doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0209-3

  • Harvey, A. J., & Callan, M. J. (2014). Getting “just deserts” or seeing the “silver lining”: The relation between judgments of immanent and ultimate justice. PlosOne, 9(7), 1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101803

  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

  • Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of ‘‘poor but happy’’ and ‘‘poor” but honest’’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823

  • Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 305–358. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39006-5

  • Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim‐derogation and victim‐enhancement as alternate routes to system‐justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x

  • King, M. L., Jr. (1963). Letter from Birmingham jail. Retrieved from https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/king-papers/documents/letter-birmingham-jail

  • Kogut, T. (2011). Someone to blame: When identifying a victim decreases helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 748–755. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.011

  • Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 149–171. doi:10.1037/a0021343

  • Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Clayton, S. (2011). Justice and self-interest: Two fundamental motives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Goldberg, J. H. (1999). When do decent people blame victims? The differing effects of the explicit-rational and implicit-experiential cognitive systems. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 627–640). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 133–162). New York: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60060-X

  • Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210. doi:10.1037/h0023562

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677. doi:10.1177/0146167296227002

  • Loseman, A., & Van den Bos, K. (2012). A self-regulation hypothesis of coping with an unjust world: Ego-depletion and self-affirmation as underlying aspects of blaming of innocent victims. Social Justice Research, 25, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0152-0

  • Maas, M., & Van Den Bos, K. (2009). An affective-experiential perspective on reactions to fair and unfair events: Individual differences in affect intensity moderated by experiential mindsets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 667–675. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.014

  • Martin, L. L. (1999). I-D compensation theory: Some implications of trying to satisfy immediate-return needs in a delayed-return culture. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 195–208. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1003_1

  • Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344. doi:10.1007/BF01048081

  • Novak, D. W, & Lerner, M. J. (1968). Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 147–152. doi:10.1037/h0025850

  • Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x

  • Peters, S. L. (2006). The social psychology of being better off than others. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, C., & Schmitt, M. (2016). Past, present, and future of social justice theory and research. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 1–11). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23, 211–238. doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2

  • Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113. doi:10.1037/h0028777

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591. doi:10.1177/0146167294205014

  • Skitka, L. J., Aramovich, N., Lytle, B. L., & Sargis, E. (2009). Knitting together an elephant: An integrative approach to understanding the psychology of justice reasoning. In D. R. Bobocel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 1–26). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stel, M., Van den Bos, K., & Bal, M. (2012). On mimicry and the psychology of the belief in a just world: Imitating the behaviors of others reduces the blaming of innocent victims. Social Justice Research, 25, 14–24. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0150-2

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1

  • Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–345. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010

  • Thomas, W. R., & Thomas, E. S. (1928). The child in America. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333–344. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.333

  • Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X

  • Van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: Fundamental questions about fairness in the workplace (pp. 273–300). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K. (2015). Humans making sense of alarming conditions: Psychological insight into the fair process effect. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Oxford handbook of justice in work organizations (pp. 403–417). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K. (2007). Hot cognition and social justice judgments: The combined influence of cognitive and affective factors on the justice judgment process. In D. de Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect (pp. 59–82). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K., Ham, J., Lind, E. A., Simonis, M., Van Essen, W. J., & Rijpkema, M. (2008). Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 201–219. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.001

  • Van den Bos, K. (2009). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 197–217. doi:10.1080/10478400903333411

  • Van den Bos, K., & Maas, M. (2009). An affective-experiential perspective on reactions to fair and unfair events: Individual differences in affect intensity moderated by experiential mindsets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 667–675. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.014

  • Van Prooijen, J. W. (2013). Individualistic and social motives for justice judgments. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299, 60–67. doi:10.1111/nyas.12143

  • Van Prooijen, J. W., & Van den Bos, K. (2009). We blame innocent victims more than I do: Self-construal level moderated responses to just-world threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1528–1539. doi:10.1177/0146167209344728

  • Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79. doi:10.1037/h0022733

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., & Mummendey, A. (1996). Positive-negative asymmetry of social discrimination: A normative analysis of differential evaluations of in-group and out-group on positive and negative attributes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 493–507. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01110.x

  • Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2016). Retributive justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 237–256). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Michèlle Bal

  2. Department of Psychology and School of Law, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Kees van den Bos

Authors
  1. Michèlle Bal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kees van den Bos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèlle Bal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA

    Claire M. Zedelius

  2. Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Barbara C. N. Müller

  3. Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA

    Jonathan W. Schooler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bal, M., van den Bos, K. (2017). Effects of Lay Beliefs on the Justice Motive. In: Zedelius, C., Müller, B., Schooler, J. (eds) The Science of Lay Theories. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation