Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lay Theories of Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Science of Lay Theories

Abstract

Creativity is of great appeal and importance to people, and they strive to understand creativity by developing lay theories. Such lay theories about creativity concern, for example, the characteristics of creative persons, such as the ‘mad genius’ idea, or environmental factors that contribute to creative performance, such as ‘group brainstorming.’ Many lay theories about creativity are completely false, and some are only partly correct. Given the importance of creativity for all domains of life, including diverse endeavors such as science, art, technology, design, sports, and medicine, we cannot afford to let lay theories guide our creative efforts without empirical scrutiny. In the current chapter, we therefore describe lay beliefs related to characteristics of the creative person, the skills and processes that are needed to achieve creativity, environments that supposedly stimulate or hinder creativity, and the properties of creative output and behavior, and critically appraise these beliefs in light of what creativity research has shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children’s artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 573–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “the social psychology of creativity”. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., Koch, S., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2015). Conceiving creativity: The nature and consequences of laypeople’s beliefs about the realization of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., Nijstad, B. A., Boot, N. C., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2016). Mad genius revisited: Vulnerability to psychopathology, biobehavioral approach-avoidance, and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 668–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelor, P., & Michael, W. B. (1991). Higher-order factors of creativity within Guilford’s structure-of-intellect model: A re-analysis of a fifty-three variable data base. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachelor, P. A., & Michael, W. B. (1997). The structure of intellect model revisited. The Creativity Research Handbook, 1, 155–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23, 1117–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Graumann, C. F., Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (Eds.). (2013). Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions on intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: Effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 341–349.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2009). Computer models of creativity. AI Magazine, 30, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V., & Lichtenstein, M. (1987). Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 871–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N. R., & Cohen, B. M. (1991). Motivation and complexity levels as determinants of heuristic use in social judgment. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 145–160). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R. (1998). The early evolution of creative thinking: Evidence from monkeys and apes. In S. Mithen (Ed.), Creativity in human evolution and prehistory (pp. 110–124). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caroff, X., & Besançon, M. (2008). Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 367–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. W., Huang, D. W., & Choi, J. N. (2012). Is task autonomy beneficial for creativity? Prior task experience and self-control as boundary conditions. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115, 458–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1972). Stages in language development and reading exposure. Harvard Educational Review, 42, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. (1995). The further exploits of AARON Painter. In S. Franchi & G. Guzeldere (Eds.), Constructions of the mind: Artificial intelligence and the humanities (Vol. 4, pp. 141–160). Standford, CA: Special edition of Stanford Humanities Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. (2002). A Million Millennial Medicis. In L. Candy & E. A. Edmonds (Eds.), Explorations in art and technology (pp. 91–104). London, UK: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, D. (2006). Computer models of musical creativity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creating Minds. (n.d.). Age and creativity. Retrieved on August 4th, 2016, from http://creatingminds.org/articles/age.htm

  • Cropley, A. J. (1990). Creativity and mental health in everyday life. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dart, P. (1989). Bus-bath-bed: A rationale for irrational predicate identifications in the service of creativity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (75th, San Francisco, CA, November 18–21, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bloom, J., Ritter, S., Kühnel, J., Reinders, J., & Geurts, S. (2014). Vacation from work: A ‘ticket to creativity’? The effects of recreational travel on cognitive flexibility and originality. Tourism Management, 44, 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Buisonjé, D. R., Ritter, S. M., De Bruin, S., Ter Horst, J. M.-L., & Meeldijk, A. (under review). Facilitating creative idea selection: The combined effects of self-affirmation, promotion focus and positive affect. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., Baas, M., Wolsink, I., & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation, and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 656–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Montaigne, M. (1685/1877/2012). Essays of Michel de Montaigne. Available http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3600/3600-h/3600-h.htm [April 26, 2016].

  • Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7, 466–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A., & Haider, H. (2015). Human creativity, evolutionary algorithms, and predictive representations: The mechanics of thought trials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 897–915. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0743-x.

  • Dodds, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (2003). A review of the experimental literature on incubation in problem solving and creativity. Creativity Research Handbook, 3, 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., Hong, Y., & Chiu, C. (1993). Implicit theories individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 644–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2, 3–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Greenwich, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1995). The Creative cognition approach. Boston, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E., & Kuglanski, A. W. (2005). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2014). Increasing your intelligence: Entity and incremental beliefs about the multiple “intelligences”. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. F. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understanding of problems in the social sciences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingras, Y., Lariviere, V., Macaluso, B., & Robitaille, J.-P. (2008). The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns. PLoS ONE, 3, e4048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gocłowska, M. A., Baas, M., Crisp, R. J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2014). Whether social schema violations help or hurt creativity depends on need for structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 959–971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodreads.com. (n.d.). Lady Gaga quotes. Retrieved from http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/201754-when-you-make-music-or-write-or-create-it-s-really

  • Greene, G. (1980). Ways of escape. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, C. (2016, March 4). 18 Things highly creative people do differently. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/04/creativity-habits_n_4859769.html

  • Gregoire, C., & Kaufman, S. B. (2016, January 4). Creative people’s brains really do work differently. Quartz. Retrieved from http://qz.com/584850/creative-peoples-brains-really-do-work-differently/

  • Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 63–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: RR Knapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurman, E. B. (1989). Travel abroad: A way to increase creativity? Educational Research Quarterly, 13, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment. Encyclopedia of Creativity, 1, 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, A., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, G., & Freedman, R. (1992). Possible Palladian villas. Cambridge: Massachusetts MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, J. (2002). The creative economy: How people make money from ideas. London, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, K. (n.d.). 20 things only highly creative people would understand. Retrieved from http://www.lifehack.org/articles/communication/20-things-remember-you-love-highly-creative-person.html

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Dissecting the golden goose: Components of studying creative writers. Communication Research Journal, 14, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment (Vol. 53). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, M., Sasser, S., & Koslow, S. (2013). Creativity awards: Great expectations? Creativity Research Journal, 25, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, R. A., Swift, H. J., & Abrams, D. (2015). A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging, 30, 180–193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Langfred, C. L., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 934–945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41, 306–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1047–1061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, N. R. (1967). Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: The need for an integrative function. Psychological Review, 74, 239–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. J. (1998). Creativity in human evolution and prehistory. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. S., Wakslak, C. J., & Krishnan, V. (2014). Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Johnson, J. F. (1998). Domain-based scoring in divergent-thinking tests: Validation evidence in an occupational sample. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 392–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). Evaluating six common stereotypes about older workers with meta-analytical data. Personnel Psychology, 65, 821–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation-related behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 585–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. A., Zielinski, B. A., Fletcher, P. T., Alexander, A. L., Lange, N., Bigler, E. D., et al. (2014). Abnormal lateralization of functional connectivity between language and default mode regions in autism. Molecular Autism, 5, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2006). The illusion of group productivity: A reduction of failures explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer, K., Süβ, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36, 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perception of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1984). Visual cognition: An introduction. Cognition, 18, 1–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaks, J. E., & Chasteen, A. L. (2013). Entity versus incremental theories predict older adults’ memory performance. Psychology and Aging, 28, 948–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., & Threlfall, K. V. (1998). Solving everyday problems creatively: The role of problem construction and personality type. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2007a). Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 855–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2007b). Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 933–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 47–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., Slijkhuis, J. M., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2014). Close monitoring as a contextual stimulator: How need for structure affects the relation between close monitoring and work outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 394–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., Zacher, H., & Stroebe, W. (2016). A lifespan perspective on creativity and innovation at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 105–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R. B., Strick, M., Derks, J., et al. (2012a). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S. M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2014). The unconscious foundations of creative thought. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S. M., van Baaren, R. B., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012b). Creativity: The role of unconscious processes in idea generation and idea selection. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S. M., & Mostert, N. (2016). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S. M., Strick, M., Bos, M. W., van Baaren, R. B., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012c). Good morning creativity: Task reactivation during sleep enhances beneficial effect of sleep on creative performance. Journal of Sleep Research, 21, 643–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roskes, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 242–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1988). Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1999). A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 161–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Personal creativity and culture. In S. Lau, A. N. B. Hui, & G. Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity when east meets west (pp. 9–22). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagiv, L., Arieli, S., Goldenberg, J., & Goldschmidt, A. (2010). Structure and freedom in creativity: The interplay between externally imposed structure and personal cognitive style. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1086–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scratchley, L. S., & Hakstian, A. R. (2001). The measurement and prediction of managerial creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, B., & Förster, J. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In C. Shalley & J. Zhou (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearring, H. A. (1992). Creativity and older adults. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 13, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Creativity and mental illness. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 381–394). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., Newell, A., & Shaw, J. C. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63–119). New York, NY: Lieber-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2014a). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2014b). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sligte, D. J., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011). Power, stability of power, and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 891–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. F. (1998). Idea-generation techniques: A formulary of active ingredients. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 104, 61–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W. (2010). Age and scientific creativity. Wiley, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W., Nijstad, B. A., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2010). Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 157–203. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Yaacov, & Liberman, Nira. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea-generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Van De Veer, E. (2010). Perceiving pure evil: The influence of cognitive load and prototypical evilness on demonizing. Social Justice Research, 23, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Strien, P. J. (2012). Psychologie van de wetenschap (Psychology of science). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Strien, P. J. (2015). Het creatieve genie (The creative genius). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Finke, R. A., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Creativity and the mind. New York, NY: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51, 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zytkow, J. (1997). Machine discovery. London, UK: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Simone M. Ritter

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Eric F. Rietzschel

Authors
  1. Simone M. Ritter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric F. Rietzschel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone M. Ritter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA

    Claire M. Zedelius

  2. Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Barbara C. N. Müller

  3. Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA

    Jonathan W. Schooler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ritter, S.M., Rietzschel, E.F. (2017). Lay Theories of Creativity. In: Zedelius, C., Müller, B., Schooler, J. (eds) The Science of Lay Theories. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation