Skip to main content

Religion and Its Cultural Evolutionary By-products

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Science of Lay Theories
  • 2359 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I provide a cultural evolutionary perspective on one of the most prevalent kind of lay beliefs: Religion, and more specifically the belief in Big Gods: powerful, watchful, morally concerned deities. In the first part of the chapter, I summarize current thinking about the cultural evolutionary origins of these beliefs. According to the cultural evolution hypothesis, religion as a whole, and Big God beliefs in particular, emerged because cultures that promoted them were able to grow and thrive better than those that did not. More specifically, the three characteristics of Big Gods—watchfulness, power, and moral concern—make them ideal for helping enforce cooperation in large groups of human beings. In the second part of the chapter, I describe by-products of these God beliefs: Effects that these beliefs have that are separate from their initial adaptive function of promoting cooperation. In particular, I explore their consequences for self-regulation, risk-taking, relationships, and human-led enforcement of prosocial norms. I end by tracing the path toward understanding and predicting the continued evolution of religious beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1621–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. M., & Baumgardner, A. H. (1986). Self-presentation and self-evaluation: Processes of self-control and social control. In R. M. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 75–97). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W., & Holmes, J. G. (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1087–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P. (2006). Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(5), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a non-natural entity: Antrhopomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 219–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Be’ery, G., & Bloom, P. B.-N. (2015). God and the welfare state—substitutes or complements? An experimental test of the effect of belief in God’s control. PloS ONE, 10(6), e1238858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J. (2000). Explanatory history of the origin of feathers. American Zoologist, 40(4), 478–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botero, C. A., Gardner, B., Kirby, K. R., Bulbulia, J., Gavin, M. C., & Gray, R. D. (2014). The ecology of religious beliefs. PNAS, 111(47), 16784–16789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132(3), 337–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4), 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2007). The self. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. C., McCullough, M. E., & Carver, C. S. (2012). The mediating role of monitoring in the association of religion with self-control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 691–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L., & Feldman, M. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chae, B. G., & Zhu, R. J. (2014). Environmental disorder leads to self-regulatory failure. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1203–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudek, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., Birch, S., & Henrich, J. (2013). Culture-gene coevolutionary theory and children’s selective social learning. In M. R. Banaji & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 181–185). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5), 218–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, D. W., Manchanda, R. V., & Argo, J. J. (2001). Embarrassment in consumer purchase: The roles of social presence and purchase familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1877/2004). The descent of man, second edition, with an introduction by Adrian Desmond and James Moore. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 279–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., Preston, J., Wegner, D. M., & Aarts, H. (2008). Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Evolution of the social brain. Science, 302(5648), 1160–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eitam, B., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42(3), 217–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. (2005). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 315–330). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Yali, A. M., & Lobel, M. (1999). When God disappoints: Difficulty forgiving God and its role in negative emotion. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(3), 365–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about god increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 298–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granqvist, P., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 49–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Blaming god for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, S. (2006). How symbols, language, and intelligence evolved from early primates to modern humans. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Ensimger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327(5972), 1480–1484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, N., & Henrich, J. (2007). Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsdu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100(1), 130–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1880). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46(276), 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. H., & Karoly, P. (1972). Self-control: A behavioristic excursion into the lion’s den. Behavioral Theory, 3(3), 398–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the Government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 18–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Landau, M. J. (2014). A functional basis for structure-seeking: Exposure to structure promotes willingness to engage in motivated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 486–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khenfer, J., Laurin, K., Tafani, E., Roux, E., & Kay, A. C. (2016a). Here’s what you gotta do! Reminders of external agency affect motivational responses to savings advice in opposing directions. Manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khenfer, J., Tafani, E., Roux, E., & Laurin, K., (2016b). When God’s (not) needed: The divergent influence of belief in divine control on goal commitment. Manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Spoon, J., Farley, J. P., Holmes, C., Longo, G. S., & McCullough, M. E. (2014). Processes linking parents’ and adolescents’ religiousness and adolescent substance use: Monitoring and self-control. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 745–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchens, M. B. (2015). Thinking about God causes internal reflection in believers and unbelievers of God. Self and Identity, 14(6), 724–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupor, D. M., Laurin, K., & Levav, J. (2015). Anticipating divine protection? Reminders of God can increase nonmoral risk taking. Psychological Science, 26(4), 374–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Whitson, J. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 694–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LatanĂ©, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 149–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurin, K., & Kay, A. C. (2016). Religion and self-regulation: Integrating skills-based and motivation-based accounts. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, & applications (pp 305–322). Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012a). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 4–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurin, K., Schumann, K., & Holmes, J. G. (2014). A relationship with God? Connecting with the divine to assuage fears of interpersonal rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 777–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurin, K., Shariff, A. F., Henrich, J., & Kay, A. C. (2012b). Outsourcing punishment to God: Beliefs in divine control reduce earthly punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1741), 3272–3281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. T. (1997). Measuring the image of God: The God image inventory and the God image scales. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 25(2), 214–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1991). Uniquely human: The evolution of speech, thought, and selfless behavior. MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind and culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, R. A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2016). Supernatural punishment, in-group biases, and material insecurity: Experiments and ethnography from Yasawa, Fiji. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 6(1), 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, M. H. C., & Rutjens, B. T. (2014). Affirming belief in scientific progress reduces environmentally friendly behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 487–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikalson, J. (2010). Ancient Greek religion. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 429–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big Gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., & Atran, S. (2004). Cognitive and emotional processes in the cultural transmission of natural and nonnatural beliefs. In M. Schaller & C. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 149–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, R., Henrich, J., & Van Vugt, M. (2008). Constraining free riding in public good games: Designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276(1655), 323–329.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2003). A tale of two defectors: The importance of standing for the evolution of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 224(1), 115–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J. (2001). Religious struggle as a predictor of mortality among medically ill elderly patients: A 2-year longitudinal study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(15), 1881–1885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, K. I., Zinnbauer, B. J., Scott, A. B., Butter, E. M., Zerowin, J., & Stanik, P. (1998). Red flags and religious coping: Identifying some religious warning signs among people in crisis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(1), 77–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peoples, H. C., & Marlowe, F. W. (2012). Subsistence and the evolution of religion. Human Nature, 23(3), 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2012). Religiously unaffiliated. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-unaffiliated/

  • Pollner, M. (1989). Divine relations, social relations, and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30(1), 92–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, J. L., & Ritter, R. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociailty with the ingroup and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1471–1483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B. G., Finkel, D. N., Shaver, J., Wales, N., Cohen, A. B., & Sosis, R. (2012). What does God know? Supernatural agents’ access to socially strategic and nonstrategic information. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 846–869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyysiäinen, I. (2009). Supernatural agents: Why we believe in souls, Gods, and Buddhas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph-Seng, B., & Nielsen, M. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rives, J. (2007). Religion in the Roman Empire. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roes, F. L., & Raymond, M. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(2), 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1986). Self-identification: Toward an integration of the private and public self (pp. 21–62). In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Meyer, D. E. (1973). Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory (pp. 395–409). In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV. New York, NY: Academic Pres,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Meek, R., Alicke, M. D., & Taylor, S. (2014). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of god predict cheating behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(2), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). Divergent effects of beliefs in heaven and hell on national crime rates. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e39048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on religious prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(1), 27–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, E. (2013). Body and mind in early China: An integrated humanities-science approach. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 81(1), 6–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. (1996). Biology and body size in human evolution: Statistical inference misapplied. Current Anthropology, 37(3), 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumida, S. S., & Brochu, C. A. (2000). Phylogenetic context for the origin of feathers. American Zoologist, 40(4), 486–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail, K. E., III, Adndt, J., & Abdollahi, A. (2012). Exploring the existential function of religion and supernatural agent beliefs among Christians, Muslims, atheists, and agnostics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1288–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2016). Aversion to playing God: A key principle underlying moral judgment. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. N., Mwangi, T. W., Roberts, D. J., Alexander, N. D., Weatherall, D. J., Wambua, S., et al. (2005). An immune basis for malaria protection by the sickle cell trait. PLoS Medicine, 2(5), e128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, O., & Bahçekapili, H. G. (2016). Supernatural and secular monitors promote human cooperation only if they remind of punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(1), 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, C.-B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 311–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Laurin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laurin, K. (2017). Religion and Its Cultural Evolutionary By-products. In: Zedelius, C., MĂĽller, B., Schooler, J. (eds) The Science of Lay Theories. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics