Abstract
In this chapter, the authors share their clinical experiences from using STIC in couple and family therapy as a clinical tool since 2010. In addition, they draw on statements from colleagues’ as well as from clients’ experiences. The authors share stories from their clinical practice that illustrate challenges and advantages with the use of a standardized and comprehensive system as STIC together with a vast variety of couples and families. Because STIC displays the clients’ answers in graphs that enable everyone present in a therapy session to see everyone’s responses, it is discussed how this may influence on the therapist and the clients. For instance, the use of STIC seems to be associated with clients becoming clearer to themselves and more focused on their needs in therapy. It is thus discussed how feedback through STIC may work as a positive exposure to the client’s own responses as well as to the other family members’ responses. It is also discussed in what cases STIC might be too burdensome or even not perceived relevant for some families. Furthermore, some youth report that they answer more honest online, as opposed to in the therapy room. The authors reflect on how the use of STIC has helped them to become more focused on therapy alliance as well as on risk items such as domestic violence. The chapter includes short transcripts of interviews with clients.
The heading is made of comments from two of our clients after using the STIC in therapy. The information in this chapter is based on clinical experience as couple and family therapists using the STIC in addition to interviews with clients. The clients who are quoted have approved to it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Salutogenesis is the theory of health promotion, in particular emphasizing resources, resilience, and sense of coherence (Antonovsky 1979).
- 2.
STIC intersession asks the client to report experiences during the last week prior to the next session.
References
Andersen, A., & Svensson, T. (2013). Internet-based mental health services in Norway and Sweden: characteristics and consequences. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40(2), 145–153. doi:10.1007/s10488-011-0388-2.
Andersen, T. (2005). Reflekterende processer: samtaler og samtaler om samtalerne. København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.
Anderson, H. (2005). Myths about “not-knowing”. Family Process, 44(4), 497–504.
Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
Berg, I. K. (1994). Family-based services: A solution-focused approach. New York: W W Norton & Co.
Bordin, E. S., & Kovacs, A. L. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252–260. doi:10.1037/h0085885.
Borg, M., Karlsson, B., & Kim, H. S. (2009). User involvement in community mental health services–principles and practices. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 16(3), 285–292. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01370.x.
Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., & Sparks, J. (2004). The heroic client: A revolutionary way to improve effectiveness through client-directed, outcome-informed therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ejbye-Ernst, D., Tejs Jørring, N., & Bredal Jacobsen, C. (2015). Klientperspektiver på anvendelsen af sørgeskjemaer i opstartfasen av et psykoterapetisk behandlingsforløb. Fokus på familien, 43(2), 109–125.
Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy: The social construction of preferred realities. New York: Norton.
Goldsmith, J. (2012). Rupture-repair events in couple therapy: An exploration of the prevalence of sudden drops in couple therapy alliance, and their impact on therapy progress. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=miami1334705054. Accessed July 26, 2016.
Oanes, C. J., Anderssen, N., Borg, M., & Karlsson, B. (in press). User involvement in therapy: Couple and family therapists’ experiences with the inclusion of a feedback procedure in clinical practice. Journal of Family Therapy.
Oanes, C. J., Borg, M., & Karlsson, B. (2015). Significant conversations or reduced relational capacity? Exploring couple and family therapists’ expectations for including a client feedback procedure. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 36(3), 342–355. doi:10.1002/anzf.1110.
Pinsof, W. M., Breunlin, D. C., Chambers, A. L., Solomon, A. H., & Russell, W. P. (2015). Integrative problem-centered metaframeworks approach. In A. S. Gurman, J. Lebow, & D. K. Snyder (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (pp. 161–191). New York: The Guilford Press.
Pinsof, W. M., & Catherall, D. R. (1986). The integrative psychotherapy alliance: Family, couple and individual therapy scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12(2), 137–151. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1986.tb01631.x.
Pinsof, W. M., & Chambers, A. (2009). Empirically informed systemic psychotherapy: Tracking patient change and therapist behavior during therapy. In J. Bray & M. Stanton (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of family psychology (pp. 431–446). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pinsof, W. M., Goldsmith, J. Z., & Latta, T. (2012). Information technology and feedback research can bridge the scientist-practitioner gap: A couple therapy example. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 1(4), 253–273.
Pinsof, W. M., Zinbarg, R., & Knobloch-Fedders, L. M. (2008). Factorial and construct validity of the revised short form integrative psychotherapy alliance scales for family, couple, and individual therapy. Family Process, 47(3), 281–301. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00254.x.
Reigstad, B., Jørgensen, K., & Wichstrøm, L. (2006). Diagnosed and self-reported childhood abuse in national and regional samples of child and adolescent psychiatric patients: Prevalences and correlates. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60(1), 58–66. doi:10.1080/08039480500504933.
Seikkula, J., & Eliassen, H. (2006). Reflekterende prosesser i praksis: klientsamtaler, veiledning, konsultasjon og forskning. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Sundet, R., & Johansen, A. (2012). Bruken av KOR-skjemaer i “Familiehjelpa i Stange”: en forskningsbasert evaluering. Drammen: IFPR - Institutt for forskning innen psykisk helse og rus, fakultetet for helsevitenskap, Høgskolen i Buskerud.
White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice New York: W. W. Norton @ Company.
White, M., & Morgan, A. (2006). Narrative therapy with children and their families. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zahl-Olsen, R., Oanes, C.J. (2017). An Anthill of Questions that Made Me Prepare for the First Session: A Clinical Vignette of the Usage of STIC Feedback System. In: Tilden, T., Wampold, B. (eds) Routine Outcome Monitoring in Couple and Family Therapy. European Family Therapy Association Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50675-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50675-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50674-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50675-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)