Skip to main content

Best Practices in Multicultural Assessment of Cognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment
  • 2209 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the author emphasizes that the continuing demographic shift in the United States has created an increasing need for assessment procedures that accurately reflect the abilities and skills of individuals who are culturally and linguistically diverse. Assessment of these individuals presents a variety of challenges, including but not limited to availability of tests that include nonnative English speakers and bilingual individuals in the standardization sample, knowledge about the cultural and language loading of assessment items, examiners with proficiency in understanding the issues related to culture and language acquisition, and with the ability to determine the potentially negative impact of cultural and linguistic loading of particular tests on examinee performance. By considering the factors presented above, as well as careful selection of instruments, examiners can work toward more accurate evaluation of an individual’s abilities and skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), Joint Committee on Standards for Educational, & Psychological Testing (US). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiou, M. S. (2000). Current nonverbal assessment instruments: A comparison of psychometric integrity and test fairness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18(3), 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, L. (1996). Infants, children, and adolescents (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (2016). Universal nonverbal intelligence test (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Assessing diverse populations with nonverbal tests of general intelligence. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior, and context (2nd ed., pp. 243–274). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, S. O. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, S. O. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1989). Effects of examiner familiarity on Black, Caucasian, and Hispanic children: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 55(4), 303–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Weiderholt, J. L. (2009). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman assessment battery for children (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Changing demographics in the American population: Implications for research on minority children and adolescents. In V. C. McLoyd & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical issues (pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mpofu, E., & Ortiz, S. O. (2009). Equitable assessment practices in diverse contexts. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 41–76). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The condition of education 2015. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015144.pdf

  • Oakland, T. (2009). How universal are test development and use? In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 1–40). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, S. H. (2003). Assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse children. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior, and context (2nd ed., pp. 563–583). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, S. H., Garza, S., & Amado, A. (1999). School psychology training pertaining to psychological assessment of African Americans. In Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, S. H., Rivera, B. D., & Ford, L. (1997). An investigation of school psychology training pertaining to bilingual psychoeducational assessment of primarily Hispanic students: Twenty-five years after Diana v California. Journal of School Psychology, 35(4), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S. O. (2002). Best practices in nondiscriminatory assessment. Best Practices in School Psychology IV, 2, 1321–1336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S. O., Ochoa, S. H., & Dynda, A. M. (2012). Testing with culturally and linguistically diverse populations: Moving beyond the verbal-performance dichotomy into evidence-based practice. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (3rd ed., pp. 526–552). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintner, R., & Keller, R. (1922). Intelligence tests of foreign children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(4), 214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Kaiser, S. M. (2003). Bias in assessment of aptitude. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior, and context (2nd ed., pp. 519–562). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Lowe, P. A. (2009). The problem of bias in psychological testing. In T. G. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), School psychology handbook (4th ed., pp. 332–374). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. L., Ochoa, S. H., & Ortiz, S. O. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J., & Witmer, S. (2012). Assessment: In special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdes, G., & Figueroa, R. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trish Franklin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franklin, T. (2017). Best Practices in Multicultural Assessment of Cognition. In: McCallum, R. (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics