Abstract
The Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: Second Edition (CTONI-2: Hammill et al. 2009) is the second edition of the CTONI that was published originally in 1997, and was designed to provide examiners an efficient means for assessing the nonverbal reasoning ability of individuals who range in age from 6–0 to 89–11. It has six subtests (i.e., Pictorial Analogies, Geometric Analogies, Pictorial Categories, Geometric Categories, Pictorial Sequences, and Geometric Sequences). Three of these subtests use pictures of familiar objects as stimuli and three use unusual geometric designs. Examinees point to their answers; no manipulation of objects, reading, writing, or oral responses are required to take the test. This chapter describes (a) the theory underlying the CTONI-2, (b) a description of the subtests and composite scores, (c) the normative scores and their interpretation, (d) the uses of the test scores, (e) the standardization, norms, and reliability, and (f) the validity of the test. The CTONI-2 provides a psychometrically sound measure of intelligence within a nonverbal format. It is appropriate for a wide range of ages and offers subtest and composite scores.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aiken, L. R., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2006). Psychological testing and assessment (12th ed.). Boston: Pearson Educational Group.
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Betz, S. K., Eickhoff, J. R., & Sullivan, S. F. (2013). Factors influencing the selection of standardized tests for the diagnosis of specific language impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 133–146.
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnson, S. K. (2010). Test of nonverbal intelligence (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Carran, D. T., & Scott, K. G. (1992). Risk assessment in preschool children: Research implications for the early detection of educational handicaps. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 196–211.
Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Smith, D. K. (1992). Psychological testing and assessment. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394–409.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Das, J. P. (1972). Patterns of cognitive ability in nonretarded and retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 6–12.
Dollaghan, C. (2004). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: What do we know, and when do we know it? Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 391–400.
Ehrler, D. J., & McGhee, R. L. (2008). Primary test of nonverbal intelligence. Austin, TX.: PRO-ED.
Firmin, M. W. (2009). Comparison of college students’ performance on the CTONI-2, the RIAS, and three measures of school achievement. An independent unpublished study done at Cedarville University, Cedarville, OH.
Gray, S., Plante, E., Vance, R., & Henrichsen, M. (1999). Performance of SLI and NL children on four tests of single-word vocabulary. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 30, 196–206.
Gredler, G. R. (2000). Early childhood screening for developmental and educational problems. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (pp. 399–411). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Wiederholt, J. L. (1997). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., & Wiederholt, J. L. (2009). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Hopkins, W. G. (2002). A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. In A new view of statistics. Retrieved July 14, 2005, from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html
Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.
Janske, J. J. (1978). A critical review of some developmental and predictor precursors of reading disabilities. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 412–516). New York: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, J. R. (2003, December). Candidate measures for screening at-risk students. Paper presented at the national research center on learning disabilities responsiveness-to-intervention symposium, Kansas City, MO. Retrieved April 3, 2006, from http://www.nrcld.org/symposium2003/jenkins/index
Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. G., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for service in an RTI framework: Candidate measures. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–599.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
Jodoin, M. G., & Gierl, M. J. (2001). Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regressions procedure for DIF detection. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(4), 329–349.
Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., Petscher, Y., & Catts, H. W. (2009). How can we improve the accuracy of screening instruments? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24(4), 174–185.
Kingslake, B. J. (1983). The predictive (in)accuracy of on-entry to school screening procedures when used to anticipate learning difficulties. British Journal of Special Education, 10, 24–26.
Levin, M. D. (1978). Developmental variation and learning disorders. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
Nunnally, J. S., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Park, S. H., Goo, J. M., & Jo, C. H. (2004). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: Practical review for radiologists. Korean Journal of Radiology, 5(1), 11–18.
Pepe, M. S. (2003). The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. New York: Oxford.
Plante, E., & Vance, R. (1994). Diagnostic accuracy of two tests of preschool language. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 70–76.
Plante, E., & Vance, R. (1995). Diagnostic accuracy of two tests of preschool language. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 70–76.
Rathvon, N. (2004). Early reading assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. (2003). Reynolds intellectual assessment scales. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. G., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Sage.
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2013). Assessment in special and inclusive education (12th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Spearman, C. E. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. New York: Macmillan.
Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 55–66.
Swets, J. A. (1996). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: Collected papers. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
U. S. Bureau of the Census. (2007). Statistical abstract of the United States (126th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Wood, F., Flowers, L., Meyer, M., & Hill, D. (2002, November). How to evaluate and compare screening tests: Principles of science and good sense. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Dyslexia Association, Atlanta.
Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF). Ottawa, OH: Directorate of Human Resources Research, Department of national Defense.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hammill, D.D., Pearson, N. (2017). Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: Second Edition. In: McCallum, R. (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50602-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50604-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)