Skip to main content

Equivalence in Research on Positive Development of Minority Children: Methodological Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Positive Development of Minority Children and Youth

Abstract

We describe methodological challenges in studies of positive development of minority youth. A framework is described that captures the main validity threats in this type of research. The framework involves different types of bias (referring to sources of systematic error in studies of minority youth). If there is bias in a study, the comparability of constructs or scores across minority groups can be challenged. Many procedures have been proposed in the literature to deal with such methodological problems, which affect either the design or the analysis of a study. We review such procedures and pay special attention to two topics that attract much attention in recent studies: response styles and mixed methods. It is concluded that sound methods can help to make study results more robust and replicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arends-Tóth, J. V., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 249–266. doi:10.1002/ejsp.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, N., Oakland, T., & Shermis, M. (2009). Cross-national invariance of children’s temperament. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 3–16. doi:10.1177/0734282908318563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodkin-Andrewsa, G. H., Haa, M. T., Cravena, R. G., & Yeunga, A. S. (2010). Factorial invariance testing and latent mean differences for the self-description questionnaire II (Short Version) with indigenous and non-indigenous Australian secondary school students. International Journal of Testing, 10, 47–79. doi:10.1080/15305050903352065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, E. P., Li, Y., Kiely, M. K., Brittian, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). The five Cs model of positive youth development: A longitudinal analysis of confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 720–735. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9530-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers, S. A., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Van Hemert, D. A. (2009). Variation in Raven’s progressive matrices scores across time and place. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 330–338. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhs, E. S., McGinley, M., & Toland, M. D. (2010). Overt and relational victimization in Latinos and European Americans: Measurement equivalence across ethnicity, gender, and grade level in early adolescent groups. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 171–197. doi:10.1177/0272431609350923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132. doi:10.1080/15305051003637306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1950). Further evidence on response sets and test design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Drenth, P. J. D. (Eds.). (1972). Mental tests and cultural adaptation. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, G. J. S., Mazzuca, J., McIsaac, E., & Zine, J. (1997). Reconstructing “drop-out”: A critical ethnography of the dynamics of Black students’ disengagement from school. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6, 80–88. doi:10.1177/1558689812437186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucette-Gates, A., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (1998). The role of bias and equivalence in the study of race, class and ethnicity. In V. C. McLoyd & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical issues (pp. 211–236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2006). Perceived family support, acculturation, and life satisfaction in Mexican American youth: A mixed-methods exploration. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 279–287. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddes, A. R., Noack, P., & Rutland, A. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G. M., Bornstein, M. H., & Pottinger, A. M. (2012). Tridimensional acculturation and adaptation among Jamaican adolescent-mother dyads in the United States. Child Development, 83, 1486–1493. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01787.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friborg, O., Martinussen, M., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2006). Likert-based vs. semantic differential-based scorings of positive psychological constructs: A psychometric comparison of two versions of a scale measuring resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 873–884. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., Tian, L., Park, N., O’Byrne, J., Schiff, M., et al. (2008). Cross-national adolescent multidimensional life satisfaction reports: Analyses of mean scores and response style differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 142–154. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9172-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, A., Padilla, J.-L., Hidalgo, M. D., Gomer-Benito, J., & Benitez, I. (2011). EASYDIF: Software for analysing differential item functioning using the Mantel-Haenszel and standardization procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 490–499. doi:10.1177/0146621610381489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, J. A. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. Van de Vijver, & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 794–800. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Effects of a general response style on cross-cultural comparisons: Evidence from the Teaching and Learning International Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 267–290. doi:10.1093/poq/nfv006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, J., Bartram, D., Inceoglu, I., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Response styles and personality traits: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1028–1045. doi:10.1177/0022022114534773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K. A., Powell, G. M., & Scanlin, M. M. (2005). Observing outcomes in youth development: An analysis of mixed methods. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 23, 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara, M., Gamboa, C., Kahramanian, M. I., Morales, L. S., & Hayes Bautista, D. E. (2005). Acculturation and Latino health in the United States: A review of the literature and its sociopolitical context. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 367–397. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, S. S., Crick, N. R., Angelucci, J., Haye, K., Jawad, A. F., Grossman, M., et al. (2006). Social cognition in context: Validating a cartoon-based attributional measure for urban girls. Child Development, 77, 1351–1358. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00939.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2008). Strategies for strengthening causal inferences in cross cultural research: The consilience approach. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8, 145–169. doi:10.1177/1470595808091788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Temane, M. (2010). Rugby versus soccer in South Africa: Content familiarity contributes to cross-cultural differences in cognitive test scores. Intelligence, 38, 82–595. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2009). Understanding and promoting resilience in children: Promotive and protective processes in schools. In T. R. Gutkin & C. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 721–738). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, M. L., Barr, A., Roosa, M. W., & Knight, G. P. (2007). Self-esteem: Assessing measurement equivalence in a multiethnic sample of youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 269–295. doi:10.1177/0272431607302009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motti-Stefanidi, F., Asendorpf, J. B., & Masten, A. S. (2012). The adaptation and well-being of adolescent immigrants in Greek schools: A multilevel, longitudinal study of risks and resources. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 451. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000090

  • Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2014). Immigrant youth adaptation in the Greek school context: A risk and resilience developmental perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 180–185. doi:10.1111/cdep.12081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neblett, E. W., Rivas-Drake, D., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2012). The promise of racial and ethnic protective factors in promoting ethnic minority youth development. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 295–303. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00239.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2010). When do children exhibit a “yes” bias? Child Development, 81, 568–580. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01416.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660–679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of “significant” findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9, 770–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharisis, V., Goudas, M., Danish, S. J., & Theodorakis, Y. (2005). The effectiveness of teaching a life skills program in a sport context. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17, 247–254. doi:10.1080/10413200591010139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaire (pp. 143–165). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña, E. D. (2007). Lost in translation: Methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Development, 78, 1255–1264. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01064.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of structure of human behavior (2nd ed.). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H. (1995). Cultural bias in assessment: Historical and thematic issues. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11, 140–146. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.11.3.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, Y. H., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 259–282. doi:10.1177/0022002187018003001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, N. R. (2006). After-school program attendance and the social development of rural Latino children of immigrant families. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 75–87. doi:10.1002/jccp.20084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, A., Goyette, K. A., & Kim, C. (2009). Socioeconomic attainments of Asian Americans. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 255–276. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shek, D. T., & Ma, C. M. (2010). Dimensionality of the Chinese positive youth development scale: Confirmatory factor analyses. Social Indicators Research, 98, 41–59. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9515-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 50–61. doi:10.1177/0022022103260380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snauwaert, B., Soenens, B., Vanbeselaere, N., & Boen, F. (2003). When integration does not necessarily imply integration: Different conceptualizations of acculturation orientations lead to different classifications. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 231–239. doi:10.1177/0022022102250250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, M. B. (1990). Development of minority children: An introduction. Child Development, 61, 267–269. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02778.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook on mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 218–235. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bc1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 141–156. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033002002

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Methodological aspects of cross-cultural research. In M. Gelfand, Y. Hong, & C. Y. Chiu (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture & psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 101–160). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 29–37. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Blommaert, J. M. E., Gkoumasi, G., & Stogianni, M. (2015). On the need to broaden the concept of ethnic identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 46, 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vaerenbergh, Y., & Thomas, T. D. (2013). Response styles in survey research: A literature review of antecedents, consequences, and remedies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 195–217. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 1024–1054. doi:10.1080/01419870701599465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. M. B., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Knight, G. P., & Zeiders, K. H. (2011). Language measurement equivalence of the ethnic identity scale with Mexican American early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 817–852. doi:10.1177/0272431610376246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yağmur, K., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2012). Acculturation and language orientations of Turkish immigrants in Australia, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1110–1130. doi:10.1177/0022022111420145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-Type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 223–233. doi:10.1080/15434300701375832

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fons J. R. van de Vijver .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Editor(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Vijver, F.J.R., He, J. (2017). Equivalence in Research on Positive Development of Minority Children: Methodological Approaches. In: Cabrera, N., Leyendecker, B. (eds) Handbook on Positive Development of Minority Children and Youth. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43645-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics