Skip to main content

Using Adaptive Interfaces to Encourage Smart Driving and Their Effect on Driver Workload

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 484))

Abstract

In-vehicle information systems (IVIS) aimed at supporting green driving have increased in both number and complexity over the past decade. However, this added information available to the driver raises significant ergonomic concerns for mental workload, distraction and ultimately driving task performance. Adaptive interfaces offer a potential solution to this problem. The Smart driving system evaluated in this study (which provided in-vehicle, real-time feedback to the driver on both green driving and safety related parameters via a Smartphone application) offers a comparatively simple workload algorithm, while offering complexity in its levels of adaptively on the display, with the theoretical aim to limit driver visual interaction and workload with the system during complex driving environments. Experimental results presented in this paper have shown that using the Smart driving system modulates workload towards manageable levels, by allowing an increase in driver workload when under low task demands (motorway and inter-urban driving) but not increasing workload when it is already at moderate levels (urban driving). Thus suggesting that any increase in workload can be integrated within the driving task using the spare attentional resource the driver has available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young, M.S., Birrell, S.A., Stanton, N.A.: Safe driving in a green world: a review of driver performance benchmarks and technologies to support ‘smart’ driving. Appl. Ergon. 42, 533–539 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. PACTS: Beyond 2010—A Holistic Approach to Road Safety in Great Britain. Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vicente, K.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Birrell, S., Young, M., Stanton, N., Jenkins, D.: Cognitive Work Analysis for safe and efficient driving. Theor. Iss. Ergon. Sci. 13, 430–449 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns, C., Hajdukiewicz, J.: Ecological Interface Design. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rasmussen, J.: The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15, 234–243 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen, J.: Skills, rules, knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 13, 257–266 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vicente, K., Rasmussen, J.: Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22, 589–606 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vicente, K.: Ecological interface design: supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, distributed, collaborative work. In: Proceedings of the Human Centered Processes Conference, pp. 93–97 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson, J.J., Crooks, L.E.: A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. Am. J. Psychol. 51, 453–471 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranney, T.A.: Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. Accid. Anal. Prev. 26, 733–750 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donmez, B., Boyle, L.N., Lee, J.D.: Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39, 581–590 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Broström, R., Engström, J., Agnvall, A., Markkula, G.: Towards the next generation intelligent driver information system (IDIS): the Volvo car interaction manager concept. In: 13th ITS World Congress, London, 8–12 Oct 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M., Triggs, T., Brown, J.: Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38, 185–191 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harbluk, J., Noy, Y., Trbovich, P., Eizenman, M.: An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers’ visual behaviour and braking performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39, 372–379 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes, P.K., Cole, B.L.: What attracts attention when driving? Ergonomics 29, 377–391 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Green, P., Shah, R.: Task time and glance measures of the use of telematics: a tabular summary of the literature. In: Safety Vehicles Using Adaptive Interface Technology (SAVE-IT) Project, Literature Review, Task 6, December 2004. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Birrell, S.A., Fowkes, M., Jennings, P.: The effect of using an in-vehicle smart driving aid on real-world driver performance. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15, 1801–1810 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Byrne, E.A., Parasuraman, R.: Psychophysiology and adaptive automation. Biol. Psychol. 42, 249–268 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hancock, P.A., Verwey, W.B.: Fatigue, workload and adaptive driver systems. Accid. Anal. Prev. 29, 495–506 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Michon, J.A. (ed.): Generic Intelligent Driver Support: A Comprehensive Report on GIDS, p. 252. Taylor & Francis, Bristol (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piechulla, W., Mayser, C., Gehrke, H., König, W.: Reducing drivers’ mental workload by means of an adaptive man-machine interface. Transp. Res. Part F 6, 233–248 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload. Ergonomics 47, 1014–1035 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dingus, T.A., Antin, J.F., Hulse, M.C., Wierwille, W.W.: Attentional demand of an automobile moving-map navigation system. Transp. Res. Part A 23, 301–315 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hancock, P.A., Wulf, G., Thom, D., Fassnacht, P.: Driver workload during differing driving manoeuvres. Accid. Anal. Prev. 22, 281–290 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harms, L.: Variation in drivers’ cognitive load. Effects of driving through village areas and rural junctions. Ergonomics 34, 151–160 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wildervanck, C., Mulder, G., Michon, J.A.: Mapping mental load in car driving. Ergonomics 21, 225–229 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hart, S., Staveland, L.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Metal Workload, pp. 139–183. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Birrell, S.A., Young, M.S.: The impact of smart driving aids on driving performance and driver distraction. Transp. Res. Part F 14, 484–493 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Birrell, S.A., Fowkes, M.: Glance behaviours when using an in-vehicle smart driving aid: a real-world, on-road driving study. Transp. Res. Part F 22, 113–125 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Smart driving system used in this study was developed as part of the Foot-LITE project which was sponsored by the Technology Strategy Board, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the UK Department for Transport. The TeleFOT project, for which these trials were conducted as part of by MIRA Ltd. in the UK, is an EU sponsored project under the Seventh Framework Programme. Additional support was offered by Innovate UK through the WMG centre High Value Manufacturing Catapult. Specific thanks go to Mark Fowkes and Nadia Shehata who assisted greatly with the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stewart Birrell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Birrell, S., Young, M., Stanton, N., Jennings, P. (2017). Using Adaptive Interfaces to Encourage Smart Driving and Their Effect on Driver Workload. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41681-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41682-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics