Abstract
In-vehicle information systems (IVIS) aimed at supporting green driving have increased in both number and complexity over the past decade. However, this added information available to the driver raises significant ergonomic concerns for mental workload, distraction and ultimately driving task performance. Adaptive interfaces offer a potential solution to this problem. The Smart driving system evaluated in this study (which provided in-vehicle, real-time feedback to the driver on both green driving and safety related parameters via a Smartphone application) offers a comparatively simple workload algorithm, while offering complexity in its levels of adaptively on the display, with the theoretical aim to limit driver visual interaction and workload with the system during complex driving environments. Experimental results presented in this paper have shown that using the Smart driving system modulates workload towards manageable levels, by allowing an increase in driver workload when under low task demands (motorway and inter-urban driving) but not increasing workload when it is already at moderate levels (urban driving). Thus suggesting that any increase in workload can be integrated within the driving task using the spare attentional resource the driver has available.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young, M.S., Birrell, S.A., Stanton, N.A.: Safe driving in a green world: a review of driver performance benchmarks and technologies to support ‘smart’ driving. Appl. Ergon. 42, 533–539 (2011)
PACTS: Beyond 2010—A Holistic Approach to Road Safety in Great Britain. Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety, London (2007)
Vicente, K.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)
Birrell, S., Young, M., Stanton, N., Jenkins, D.: Cognitive Work Analysis for safe and efficient driving. Theor. Iss. Ergon. Sci. 13, 430–449 (2012)
Burns, C., Hajdukiewicz, J.: Ecological Interface Design. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)
Rasmussen, J.: The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15, 234–243 (1985)
Rasmussen, J.: Skills, rules, knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 13, 257–266 (1983)
Vicente, K., Rasmussen, J.: Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22, 589–606 (1992)
Vicente, K.: Ecological interface design: supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, distributed, collaborative work. In: Proceedings of the Human Centered Processes Conference, pp. 93–97 (1999)
Gibson, J.J., Crooks, L.E.: A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. Am. J. Psychol. 51, 453–471 (1938)
Ranney, T.A.: Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. Accid. Anal. Prev. 26, 733–750 (1994)
Donmez, B., Boyle, L.N., Lee, J.D.: Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39, 581–590 (2007)
Broström, R., Engström, J., Agnvall, A., Markkula, G.: Towards the next generation intelligent driver information system (IDIS): the Volvo car interaction manager concept. In: 13th ITS World Congress, London, 8–12 Oct 2006 (2006)
Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M., Triggs, T., Brown, J.: Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38, 185–191 (2006)
Harbluk, J., Noy, Y., Trbovich, P., Eizenman, M.: An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers’ visual behaviour and braking performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39, 372–379 (2007)
Hughes, P.K., Cole, B.L.: What attracts attention when driving? Ergonomics 29, 377–391 (1986)
Green, P., Shah, R.: Task time and glance measures of the use of telematics: a tabular summary of the literature. In: Safety Vehicles Using Adaptive Interface Technology (SAVE-IT) Project, Literature Review, Task 6, December 2004. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (2004)
Birrell, S.A., Fowkes, M., Jennings, P.: The effect of using an in-vehicle smart driving aid on real-world driver performance. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15, 1801–1810 (2014)
Byrne, E.A., Parasuraman, R.: Psychophysiology and adaptive automation. Biol. Psychol. 42, 249–268 (1996)
Hancock, P.A., Verwey, W.B.: Fatigue, workload and adaptive driver systems. Accid. Anal. Prev. 29, 495–506 (1997)
Michon, J.A. (ed.): Generic Intelligent Driver Support: A Comprehensive Report on GIDS, p. 252. Taylor & Francis, Bristol (1993)
Piechulla, W., Mayser, C., Gehrke, H., König, W.: Reducing drivers’ mental workload by means of an adaptive man-machine interface. Transp. Res. Part F 6, 233–248 (2003)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload. Ergonomics 47, 1014–1035 (2004)
Dingus, T.A., Antin, J.F., Hulse, M.C., Wierwille, W.W.: Attentional demand of an automobile moving-map navigation system. Transp. Res. Part A 23, 301–315 (1989)
Hancock, P.A., Wulf, G., Thom, D., Fassnacht, P.: Driver workload during differing driving manoeuvres. Accid. Anal. Prev. 22, 281–290 (1990)
Harms, L.: Variation in drivers’ cognitive load. Effects of driving through village areas and rural junctions. Ergonomics 34, 151–160 (1991)
Wildervanck, C., Mulder, G., Michon, J.A.: Mapping mental load in car driving. Ergonomics 21, 225–229 (1978)
Hart, S., Staveland, L.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Metal Workload, pp. 139–183. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1988)
Birrell, S.A., Young, M.S.: The impact of smart driving aids on driving performance and driver distraction. Transp. Res. Part F 14, 484–493 (2011)
Birrell, S.A., Fowkes, M.: Glance behaviours when using an in-vehicle smart driving aid: a real-world, on-road driving study. Transp. Res. Part F 22, 113–125 (2014)
Acknowledgments
The Smart driving system used in this study was developed as part of the Foot-LITE project which was sponsored by the Technology Strategy Board, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the UK Department for Transport. The TeleFOT project, for which these trials were conducted as part of by MIRA Ltd. in the UK, is an EU sponsored project under the Seventh Framework Programme. Additional support was offered by Innovate UK through the WMG centre High Value Manufacturing Catapult. Specific thanks go to Mark Fowkes and Nadia Shehata who assisted greatly with the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Birrell, S., Young, M., Stanton, N., Jennings, P. (2017). Using Adaptive Interfaces to Encourage Smart Driving and Their Effect on Driver Workload. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 484. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41681-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41682-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)