Abstract
For several centuries, youth offenders were treated in a highly punitive manner, as they were managed concurrently with adult offenders, with little consideration given to their cognitive, emotional, or developmental immaturity. The first juvenile justice system was created in 1899, and it was a very separate entity from the adult system. The initial juvenile justice system ultimately led to a more rehabilitative approach to dealing with youth offenders as this system took into consideration a youth’s moral, intellectual, social, and emotional development and worked to treat and rehabilitate more than punish young offenders. More recently, the juvenile justice system has begun to mirror the adult system, both in terms of court processes, rights provided, and consequences subsumed. While this has been beneficial in that it provides more legal rights to juveniles, it has also resulted in a more punitive approach to dealing with juvenile offenders, with more youth being detained and more juveniles being transferred to adult courts. This chapter addresses the history of the juvenile justice system and how it has developed across the last two centuries and most notably the past few decades. A general overview of the processing of a juvenile through the juvenile justice system is provided in this chapter, as well as how the juvenile justice system compares to the adult criminal justice system. Concepts and definitions important in understanding juvenile delinquency are also provided, as well as relevant statutes and case law that have helped protect the rights of juvenile delinquents. In addition, considerations that may need to be taken into account when processing a youth with a disability in the juvenile justice system are provided, as well as an introduction to issues related to the implications that the symptoms and presentation of a disability may have on a youth offender’s level of risk for reoffending and related to a youth’s competency to stand trial.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dusky v. United States. (1960). 362 U.S. 402.
Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 (1975).
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). What is the sequence of events in the criminal justice system? Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/justsys.cfm.
Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982).
Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010).
Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
Grisso, T. (2005). Evaluating juveniles’ adjudicative competence: A guide for clinical practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
Grisso, T., & Quinlan, J. (2005). Juvenile court clinical services: A national description. Worcester, MA: Law and Psychiatry Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of information (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293–323. doi:10.1037//1076-8971.2.2.293.
In re Gault, 387, U.S. 1 (1967).
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).
Heilbrun, K., Leheny, C., Thomas, L., & Huneycutt, D. (1997). A national survey of U.S. statutes on juvenile transfer: Implications for policy and practice. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 125–149.
Hoge, R. (2001). The juvenile offender: Theory, research, and applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Hoge, R. D. (2002). Standardized instruments for assessing risk and need in youthful offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 380–395.
Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966).
Mack, J. (1909). The juvenile court. Harvard Law Review, 23, 120.
Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. (2012)
National Council on Disability. (2003). Addressing the needs of youth with disabilities in the juvenile justice system: The current status of evidence-based research. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.
Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 329–353. doi:10.1177/0093854809331457.
Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944).
Puzzanchera, C. (2013). Juvenile arrests 2011. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
Sacks, H., & Reader, W. (1992). History of the juvenile court. In M. G. Kalogerakis (Ed.), Handbook of psychiatric practice in the juvenile court (pp. 5–11). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Schall v. Martin, 467 U.S. 253 (1984).
Shoemaker, D. (2005). Theories of delinquency: An examination of explanations of delinquent behavior (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 National report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
Sprague, W. (1915). Blackstone commentaries, abridged (9th ed.). Chicago, IL: Calaghan.
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., & Grisso, T. (2012). Risk assessment in juvenile justice: A guidebook for implementation. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
Warren, J., Aaron, J., Ryan, E., Chauhan, P., & DuVal, J. (2003). Correlates of adjudicative competence among psychiatrically impaired juveniles. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(3), 299–309.
Zimring, R. E. (2005). American juvenile justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, K.C., Morris, R.J. (2016). History of the Juvenile Justice System. In: Juvenile Delinquency and Disability. Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29343-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29343-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29341-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29343-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)