Abstract
The aim of this qualitative research study was to examine the construction, deconstruction and reconstruction of adolescent identities by exploring social practices within the digital landscape of a social networking site called Ning. More specifically, we ask: (a) how are adolescents’ identities shaped and performed, as they use a social networking platform to present themselves to the world, and (b) how do offline and online identities correspond and differ in the context of their out-of-school and schooled lives? We share the findings of this study that examines how twenty-three 12 and 13 year old students constructed and presented their identities to their classmates and teacher and how these identities compared to and contrasted with their offline classroom identities, focusing on an in-depth analysis of two students who participated in social practices in ways that both reflect and challenge their online and offline identities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvermann, D. E. (2010). Adolescents online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, & popular culture. New York: Peter Lang.
Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Newark: International Reading Association.
Bai, H. (2003). Student motivation and social presence in online learning: Implications for future research. In C. Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of the society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2003 (pp. 2714–2720). Chesapeake: AACE.
Beach, R., Appleman, D., Hynds, S., & Wilhelm, J. (2011). Teaching literature to adolescents. New York: Routledge.
Black, R. W. (2007). Digital design: English language learners and reader reviews in online fiction. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 115–136). New York: Peter Lang.
Boyd, D. (2007). Identity production in a networked culture: Why youth heart. The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brady, K., Holcomb, L., & Smith, B. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the E-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 151–160.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Burn, A. (2008). The case of rebellion: Researching multimodal texts. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 151–178). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 241–254.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London/New York: Routledge/Falmer.
DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Francis, A. (2009). Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of the society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2009 (pp. 329–336). Chesapeake: AACE.
Ellman, R. (1987). Oscar Wilde. London: Faber.
Erikson, E. E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Hung, H.-T., & Yuen, S. C.-Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703–714.
Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. London: Routledge.
Jewitt, C. (2008). The visual in learning and creativity: A review of the literature. London: Creative Partnerships.
Jones, R., & Hafner, C. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. New York: Routledge.
Ke, F., Chavez, A., Causarano, P.-N. L., & Causarano, A. (2011). Identity presence and knowledge building: Joint emergence in online learning environments? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 349–370.
Kear, K. (2011). Online and social networking communities: A best practice guide for educators. New York: Routledge.
Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001a). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001b). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
Kroger, J. (2004). Identity in adolescence: The balance between self and other. New York: Routledge.
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.
Schmitt, K. L., Dayanim, S., & Matthias, S. (2008). Construction as an expression of social development. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 496–506.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Subrahmanyam, K., & Smahel, D. (2011). Digital youth: The role of media in development. New York: Springer.
Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel, D., & Greenfield, P. (2006). Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 395–406.
Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 420–433.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (2008). Imagining, keyboarding, and posting identities: Young people and new media technologies. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 25–48). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, J., Morrison, L., Thompson, S. (2016). Who Do You Think You Are? Examining the Off/Online Identities of Adolescents Using a Social Networking Site. In: Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., Vanderhoven, E., Haers, J., Segaert, B. (eds) Youth 2.0: Social Media and Adolescence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27893-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27893-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27891-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27893-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)