Skip to main content

Complete Versus Incomplete Myocardial Revascularization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coronary Graft Failure

Abstract

Complete myocardial revascularization (CR) is the complete alleviation of coronary obstruction burden whether by coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is an appealing concept, yet several issues have emerged as to whether or not it should be a therapeutic goal. The current chapter will review the definition of CR and incomplete revascularization (IR), potential pitfalls, as well as the clinical evidence in CABG, PCI and the treatment of acute coronary syndromes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jones EL, Craver JM, Guyton RA, Bone DK, Hatcher Jr CR, Riechwald N. Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operation. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51(1):7–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawrie GM, Morris Jr GC, Silvers A, Wagner WF, Baron AE, Beltangady SS, et al. The influence of residual disease after coronary bypass on the 5-year survival rate of 1274 men with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1982;66(4):717–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, Holmes DR, Jones RH, Sharma S, et al. Incomplete revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents: impact on adverse outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(1):17–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10):961–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(4):217–25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bell MR, Bailey KR, Reeder GS, Lapeyre 3rd AC, Holmes Jr DR. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease: how important is complete revascularization for cardiac event-free survival? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16(3):553–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowley MJ, Vandermael M, Topol EJ, Whitlow PL, Dean LS, Bulle TM, et al. Is traditionally defined complete revascularization needed for patients with multivessel disease treated by elective coronary angioplasty? Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study (MAPS) Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(5):1289–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ong AT, Serruys PW. Complete revascularization: coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2006;114(3):249–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):e44–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gossl M, Faxon DP, Bell MR, Holmes DR, Gersh BJ. Complete versus incomplete revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous intervention in stable coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(4):597–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia S, Sandoval Y, Roukoz H, Adabag S, Canoniero M, Yannopoulos D, et al. Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):1421–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). EuroIntervention. 2015;10(9):1024–94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Genereux P, Palmerini T, Caixeta A, Rosner G, Green P, Dressler O, et al. Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(24):2165–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kereiakes DJ. Reassessing the importance of complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2014;15(1):24–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’ t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourassa MG, Yeh W, Holubkov R, Sopko G, Detre KM. Long-term outcome of patients with incomplete vs complete revascularization after multivessel PTCA. A report from the NHLBI PTCA Registry. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(1):103–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott R, Blackstone EH, McCarthy PM, Lytle BW, Loop FD, White JA, et al. Isolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery: late consequences of incomplete revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120(1):173–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Taylor PC, Goormastic M, Stewart RW, Novoa R, et al. The effect of coronary reoperation on the survival of patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts to coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105(4):605–12; discussion 12–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bell MR, Gersh BJ, Schaff HV, Holmes Jr DR, Fisher LD, Alderman EL, et al. Effect of completeness of revascularization on long-term outcome of patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1992;86(2):446–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rastan AJ, Walther T, Falk V, Kempfert J, Merk D, Lehmann S, et al. Does reasonable incomplete surgical revascularization affect early or long-term survival in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease receiving left internal mammary artery bypass to left anterior descending artery? Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S70–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aziz A, Lee AM, Pasque MK, Lawton JS, Moazami N, Damiano Jr RJ, et al. Evaluation of revascularization subtypes in octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S65–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kozower BD, Moon MR, Barner HB, Moazami N, Lawton JS, Pasque MK, et al. Impact of complete revascularization on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(1):112–6; discussion 6–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kip KE, Bourassa MG, Jacobs AK, Schwartz L, Feit F, Alderman EL, et al. Influence of pre-PTCA strategy and initial PTCA result in patients with multivessel disease: the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation. 1999;100(9):910–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bourassa MG, Kip KE, Jacobs AK, Jones RH, Sopko G, Rosen AD, et al. Is a strategy of intended incomplete percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty revascularization acceptable in nondiabetic patients who are candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery? The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(6):1627–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Toth G, De Bruyne B, Casselman F, De Vroey F, Pyxaras S, Di Serafino L, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2013;128(13):1405–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takagi H, Watanabe T, Mizuno Y, Kawai N, Umemoto T, Group A. A meta-analysis of adjusted risk estimates for survival from observational studies of complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;18(5):679–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier HJ, Schonberger JP, et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(15):1117–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, Gutierrez-Chico JL, van den Brand MJ, Rensing BJ, et al. Impact of completeness of revascularization on the five-year outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft patients (from the ARTS-II study). Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(10):1369–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ijsselmuiden AJ, Ezechiels J, Westendorp IC, Tijssen JG, Kiemeneij F, Slagboom T, et al. Complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 2004;148(3):467–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McLellan CS, Ghali WA, Labinaz M, Davis RB, Galbraith PD, Southern DA, et al. Association between completeness of percutaneous coronary revascularization and postprocedure outcomes. Am Heart J. 2005;150(4):800–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gao Z, Xu B, Yang YJ, Yuan JQ, Chen J, Chen JL, et al. Long-term outcomes of complete versus incomplete revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(3):343–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Song YB, Lee SY, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Choi JH, Lee SH, et al. Complete versus incomplete revascularization for treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era. Heart Vessels. 2012;27(5):433–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bangalore S, Sawhney S, Kinlay S, Gersh BJ, Faxon DP. Complete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta analysis. Circulation. 2009;120:S978.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(21):2105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1208–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cavender MA, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Peterson ED, Weintraub WS, Rao SV. Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(4):507–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, Nikolsky E, Assali A, Claessen BE, et al. Prognostic impact of staged versus “one-time” multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(7):704–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, Chase AJ, Edwards RJ, Hughes LO, et al. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1115–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gershlick A. Complete versus Lesion-only PRimary PCI Trial (CvLPRIT Trial). European Society of Cardiology Congress, Barcelona; Sept 1 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brener SJ, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Bhatt DL, Weintraub WS, Brindis RG, et al. Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report. Am Heart J. 2008;155(1):140–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosner GF, Kirtane AJ, Genereux P, Lansky AJ, Cristea E, Gersh BJ, et al. Impact of the presence and extent of incomplete angiographic revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. Circulation. 2012;125(21):2613–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Layland J, Oldroyd KG, Curzen N, Sood A, Balachandran K, Das R, et al. Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(2):100–11.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Mack M, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(25):2375–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dauerman HL. Reasonable incomplete revascularization. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2337–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Arroyo MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arroyo, D., Stadelmann, M., Puricel, S., Cook, S.P. (2016). Complete Versus Incomplete Myocardial Revascularization. In: Ţintoiu, I., Underwood, M., Cook, S., Kitabata, H., Abbas, A. (eds) Coronary Graft Failure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26513-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26515-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics