Skip to main content

Family Heterogeneity Over the Life Course

  • Chapter
Handbook of the Life Course

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

This chapter summarizes recent research on family formation and processes from a life course perspective. It reviews research and theory, focusing on increasing heterogeneity in the family and changes in attitudes, behavior, public policies, and reproductive technology that have long-term consequences for family formation and gender roles. It examines broad social changes, including changes in the first half (women’s increased commitment to employment) and in the second half (men’s increasing involvement in the home and, particularly, parenting) of the ongoing gender revolution. It speculates about implications of these changes for the intimate lives of individuals in future generations. The chapter is divided into sections on childhood and adolescence, young adulthood and adulthood, and aging and retirement. The final section focuses on challenges to thinking about families and family change over the coming decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The major criticism of Lareau’s conceptualization is that family structure and class are confounded. All of the poor families in her study were single parent families whereas all of the middle class families were two-parent families. Given the large differences in available time in two-parent and single parent families, natural growth may result more from lesser availability of parental time and resources than education/class. Research shows that parental goals and values are similar in both middle and working class families; what differ are the constraints that income and family structure place on them (Hofferth et al. 2009).

References

  • Antoniades, C. B. (2011, July 28). Five years of Date Lab: Who got hitched, who got ditched and what we’ve learned in our quest for a spark. Washington Post Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/five-years-of-date-lab-who-got-hitched-who-got-ditched-and-what-weve-learned-in-our-quest-for-a-spark/2011/07/05/gIQAILlUeI_story.html

  • Anxo, D., Mencarini, L., Pailhe, A., Solaz, A., Tanturri, M., & Flood, L. (2011). Gender differences in time use over the life course in France, Italy, Sweden and the US. Feminist Economics, 179, 159–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S., & Milkie, M. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 705–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T., & Savci, E. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 480–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P., & Hakim, C. (1997). Between equalization and marginalization: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, A., Martinez, G., Mosher, W., Abma, J., & Jones, J. (2005). Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (Tech. Rep. No. 23(25)). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, A., Copen, C., & Stephen, E. (2014). Infertility service use in the United States: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010. National Vital Statistics Report, 73, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84(3), 634–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child Trends. (2014). Births to unmarried women. http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=births-to-unmarried-women

  • Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1288–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copen, C. E., Daniels, K., Vespa, J., & Mosher, W. D. (2012). First marriages in the United States: Data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, 49, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D., & Hermsen, J. (2014, July 30). Back on track? The stall and rebound in support for women’s new roles in work and politics, 1977–2012 (brief report). Retrieved October 7, 2014, from https://contemporaryfamilies.org/gender-revolution-rebound-brief-back-on-track/

  • Deleire, T., & Kalil, A. (2002). Good things come in threes: Single-parent multigenerational family structure and adolescent adjustment. Demography, 39(2), 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., & Barber, B. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 10–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., & Kefalas. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., & Nelson, T. J. (2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. CD, 69, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2014). America’s young adults: Special issue, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A., & Matjasko, J. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75, 159–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feliciano, C., & Rumbaut, R. (2005). Educational and occupational expectations and outcomes among adult children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 1087–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forste, R., & Jarvis, J. (2007). “Just like his dad”: Family background and residency with children among young adult fathers. Fathering, 5(2), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G., & Cooke, A. (2014). United States census snapshot: 2010. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Census2010Snapshot-US-v2.pdf?r=1

  • Gauthier, A., & Smeeding, T. (2003). Time use at older ages: Cross-national differences. Research on Aging, 252, 247–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. (1977). Updating the life cycle of the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, J. E. (2010). Connecting complex processes: A decade of research on immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 498–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, J. E., & Hohmann-Marriott, B. (2007). Academic performance of young children in immigrant families: The significance of race, ethnicity, and national origins. International Migration Review, 41, 371–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F. (1990). The aging of the gender revolution. Research on Aging, 12, 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F. (2000). Men, children and the future of the family in the third millennium. Futures, 32, 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F., & Kaufman, G. (2006). Willingness to stepparent: Attitudes towards partners who already have children. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1415–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F., & Sassler, S. (2006). Creating stepfamilies: Integrating children into the study of union formation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 275–291, erratum 68 (3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1991). New families, no families. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F., Hofferth, S. L., & Curtin, S. C . (2014). Parenthood and leaving home in young adulthood. Population Research and Policy Review. doi:10.1007/s11113-014-9334-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1994). Succeeding generations: On the effects of investments in children. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L. (2009). Changes in American children’s time, 1997–2003. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 61, 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L. (2010). Home media and children’s achievement and behavior. CD, 81, 1598–1619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Anderson, K. (2003). Are all dads equal? Biology vs. marriage as basis for paternal investment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Goldscheider, F. (2010). Family structure and the transition to parenthood. Demography, 47, 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Moon, U. J. (2011). Electronic play, study, communication, and adolescent achievement and behavior, 2003–2008. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Moon, U. J. (2013, August). Childhood activities, achievement, and immigrant transitions to adulthood. In Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). Changes in American children’s time, 1981–1997. In S. Hofferth & T. Owens (Eds.), Children at the millennium: Where did we come from, where are we going? (pp. 193–229). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., Kinney, D., & Dunn, J. (2009). The hurried child: Myth vs. reality. In K. Matsuka & C. Christiansen (Eds.), Life balance: Multidisciplinary theories and research (pp. 183–206). Bethesda: AOTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., Pleck, J. H., & Vesely, C. K. (2012). The transmission of parenting from fathers to sons. Parenting: Science and Practice, 12, 282–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., Pleck, J. H., Goldscheider, F., Curtin, S., & Hrapczynski, K. (2013). Family structure and men’s motivation for parenthood in the United States. In N. J. Cabrera & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Handbook of father involvement (pp. 57–80). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J. L. (2006). Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries: 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (2014, August 13). Whites uneasy at idea of mostly minority U.S. (Workblog).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J., Goldscheider, F., & Garcia-Manglano, J. (2013). Growing parental economic power in parent-adult child households: Coresidence and financial dependency in the United States, 1960–2010. Demography, 50, 1449–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G. (2006). Gender roles and marital happiness in later life. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 735–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreider, R. M., & Ellis, R. (2011). Living arrangements of children: 2009. Current Population Reports, P70(126), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, B., Korunka, C., Hoonakker, P., & Raymo, J. (2010). Work and family characteristics as predictors of early retirement in married men and women. Research on Aging, 32(4), 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, L. (2014). A child’s day: Living arrangements, nativity, and family transition. Current Population Reports, P70(139), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E., & Martin, J. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W., Brown, S., Lamidi, E., & Payne, K. (2014). Trends in births to single and cohabiting mothers, 1980–2009 (Tech. Rep. No. FP-14-05). Bowling Green: National Center for Family and Marriage Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. S., & Jencks, C. (2015). Was Moynihan right? What happens to children of unmarried mothers. Education Next, 15(2). Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/was-moynihan-right/

  • McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, R. B., Jr. (1995). Extracurricular activities and high school dropouts. Sociology of Education, 68, 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, C., & McLanahan, S. (2007). Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1065–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, K. (2014). Demographic profile of same-sex couple households with minor children, 2012 (Tech. Rep. No. FP-14-03). Bowling Green: National Center for Family and Marriage Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1993). Are “family-supportive” employer policies relevant to men? In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 217–237). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porterfield, S., & Winkler, A. (2007). Teen time use and parental education: Evidence from the CPS, MTF, and ATUS. Monthly Laboratory Reviews, 130, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raley, S., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Sons, daughters, and family processes: Does gender of children matter? Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassler, S. (2010). Partnering across the life course: Sex, relationships, and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassler, S., & Cunningham, A. (2008). How cohabitors view childbearing. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1–43. doi:10.1086/386270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C., & Mare, R. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage form 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1247–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J., Gerner, A., & the Committee on Psychosocial aspects of Child and Family Health. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129, e232–e246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013, October 21). Online dating and relationships. Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://Pewinternet.org/reports/21013/online-dating.aspx

  • Solomon, C., Acock, A., & Walker, A. (2004). Gender ideology and investment in housework: Postretirement change. Journal of Family Issues, 252, 1550–1571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfors, M., & Goldscheider, F. (2015). The forest and the trees: Industrialization, demographic change, and the ongoing gender revolution in the United States and Sweden, 1870–2010 (Tech. Rep. No. SRRD_2014_18). Stockholm: Stockholm Research Reports in Demography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szinovacz, M. (2000). Changes in housework after retirement: A panel analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family 62, 78-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical abstract of the U.S. 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. G., Moore, Q., Clarkwest, A., & Killewald, A. (2014). The long-term effects of building strong families: A program for unmarried parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 446–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. L., & Martinson, B. C. (1993). Family structure and the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review, 58, 210–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. L., & Thomson, E. (2001). Race differences in family experience and early sexual initiation: Dynamic models of family structure and family change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 682–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Hofferth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hofferth, S., Goldscheider, F. (2016). Family Heterogeneity Over the Life Course. In: Shanahan, M., Mortimer, J., Kirkpatrick Johnson, M. (eds) Handbook of the Life Course. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20880-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20880-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20879-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20880-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics