Abstract
This commentary identifies what research evidence is needed to inform policy on what may be incarceration’s longest-lasting legacy—its impact on the next generation. Drawing on theory and practice, these comments are targeted to researchers interested in generating and disseminating policy-relevant research to build better public policy for children of incarcerated parents. For policy-informed evidence, researchers need to understand the policymakers who will be using the information and the environment in which they operate. For evidence-informed policy, policymakers need research that provides a more complete and comprehensive understanding of how children’s well-being is influenced by contact with their incarcerated parents, what the mediators and moderators of that influence are, and what the cost/benefits might be of intervening in ways that will benefit children. What’s more, policymakers need family-focused research on how families can contribute to more effective and efficient policies, what the advertent and inadvertent consequences of policies are for fragile families, who the concept of family should include, and whether family disparities exist. Just as the number of children losing a parent to incarceration is unprecedented, researchers are called to produce research-based, family-focused evidence that is unprecedented in its scale and quality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abner, K., & Gordon, R. A. (2012). Differential response: A family impact analysis (Family impact analysis series). Madison, WI: Family Impact Institute.
Acock, A. C., & Acock, D. A. (2014). When men are released from prison: What have we done? Family Focus, 59(F3), F5.
Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidenced-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Arditti, J. A. (2012). Parental incarceration and the family: Psychological and social effects of imprisonment on children, parents, and caregivers. New York: New York University Press.
Arditti, J. A. (2014). A family perspective on incarceration and criminal justice involvement. Family Focus, 59, F1–F2, F4, F6–F7.
Arditti, J. A., Joest, K. S., Lambert-Shute, J., & Walker, L. (2010). The role of emotions in fieldwork: A self-study of family research in a corrections setting. The Qualitative Report, 15, 1387–1414.
Arditti, J. A., & Savla, J. (2013). Parental incarceration and child trauma symptoms in single caregiver homes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9867-2
Bogenschneider, K. (2014). Family policy matters: How policymaking affects families and what professionals can do (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group.
Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. (2010). Evidence-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Bogenschneider, K., & Gross, E. (2004). From ivory tower to state house: How youth theory can inform youth policy making. Family Relations, 53, 21–26. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2004.00005.x.
Bogenschneider, K., Little, O., Ooms, T., Benning, S., Cadigan, K., & Corbett, T. (2012). The family impact lens: A family-focused, evidence-informed approach to policy and practice. Family Relations, 61, 514–531. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00704.x.
Bogenschneider, K., Little, O., & Johnson, K. (2013). Policymakers’ use of social science research: Looking within and across policy actors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 263–275. doi:10.1111/jomf.12009.
Carroll, J. (2007, December 26). Public: “Family values” important to presidential vote. Gallup poll. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/103375/public-family-values-important-presidential-vote.aspx
Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1991). Using a specialized foster care community treatment model for children and adolescents leaving the state mental hospital. Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 266–276. doi:10.1002/1520-6629(199107)19:33.0.CO;2-5.
Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Knopf.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2008). Differential response to reports of child abuse and neglect. Retrieved from https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/issue_briefs/differential_response/differential_response.pdf
Comfort, M., Nurse, A. M., McKay, T., & Kramer, K. (2011). Taking children into account. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 839–850. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00750.x.
Corbett, T. (1993). Child poverty and welfare reform: Progress or paralysis? Focus, 15(1), 1–46.
Courtney, M. E., Hook, J. L., & Lee, J. S. (2010). Distinct subgroups of former foster youth during young adulthood: Implications for policy and practice (Issue Brief). Retrieved from http://www.chapinhall.org/sites/default/files/publications/Midwest_IB4_Latent_Class_2.pdf
Cowan, P., & Cowan, C. P. (2008). Diverging family policies to promote children’s well-being in the UK and US: Some relevant data from family research and intervention studies. Journal of Children’s Services, 3(4), 4–16.
Dallaire, D. H., & Zeman, J. L. (2013). Empathy as a protective factor for children with incarcerated parents. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, 7–25. doi:10.1111/mono.12018.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (2007). Meta-analysis of family-centered help-giving practices research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 370–378. doi:10.1002/mrdd.20176.
Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C. R., Jr., & Burraston, B. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of a parent management training program for incarcerated parents: Proximal impacts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, 75–93. doi:10.1111/mono.12022.
Edin, K., & Nelson, T. J. (2013). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Golinelli, D., & Minton, T. D. (2014). Jail inmates at midyear 2013—Statistical tables (revised) [Table]. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=4988
Haidt, J., & Hetherington, M. J. (2012, September 17). Look how far we’ve come apart. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/look-how-far-weve-come-apart/
Harris, B. H., & Kearney, M. S. (2014). The unequal burden of crime and incarceration on America’s poor. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Holt, N., & Miller, D. (1972). Explorations in inmate-family relationships (Research Report No. 46). Retrieved from http://www.fcnetwork.org/reading/holt-miller/holt-millersum.html#SUMMARY
Kruttschnitt, C. (2011). Is the devil in the details? Crafting policy to mitigate the collateral consequences of parental incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 829–837. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00732.x.
Levin, B. R. (2003, November). Improving research–policy relationships: Lessons from the case of literacy. Paper prepared for the OISE/UT International Literacy Conference: Literacy Policies for the Schools We Need, Toronto, Canada.
Levin, B. R. (2005). Governing education. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1952)
Massoglia, M., & Warner, C. (2011). The consequences of incarceration: Challenges for scientifically informed and policy-relevant research. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 851–863. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00754.x.
McHale, J. P., Salman, S., Strozier, A., & Cecil, D. K. (2013). Triadic interactions in mother–grandmother coparenting systems following maternal release from jail. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, 57–74. doi:10.1111/mono.12021.
McKay, T., Bir, A., & Lindquist, C. (2014). Facing incarceration and preparing for reentry: The needs and hopes of young families. Family Focus, 59(F7), F9–F10.
Morris, E. (2001). Theodore rex. New York: Random House.
Myers, B. J., Mackintosh, V. H., Kuznetsova, M. I., Lotze, G. M., Best, A. M., & Ravindran, N. (2013). Teasing, bullying, and emotion regulation in children of incarcerated mothers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, 26–40. doi:10.1111/mono.12019.
National Child Traumatic Stress Network. (2014). Understanding child trauma. Retrieved from http://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/policy_and_the_nctsn_final.pdf
Ooms, T. (1995, October). Taking families seriously: Family impact analysis as an essential policy tool. Paper presented at the Expert Meeting on Family Impact, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ooms, T., & Preister, S. (1988). A strategy for strengthening families: Using family criteria in policymaking and program evaluation. Washington, DC: AAMFT Research and Education Foundation.
Pew Research Center. (2010). The decline of marriage and rise of new families. Retrieved from http://pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/11/pew-social-trends-2010-families.pdf
Pew Research Center. (2012). Partisan polarization surges in Bush, Obama years–Trends in American values: 1987–2012 [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/06/04/partisan-polarization-surges-in-bush-obama-years/
Poehlmann, J. (2005). Representations of attachment relationships in children of incarcerated mothers. Child Development, 76, 679–696. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00871.x.
Poehlmann, J., Dallaire, D., Booker Loper, A., & Shear, L. (2010). Children’s contact with their incarcerated parents: Research findings and recommendations. American Psychologist, 65, 575–598. doi:10.1037/a0020279.
Sampson, R. J. (2011). The incarceration ledger: Toward a new era in assessing societal consequences. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 819–828. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00756.x.
Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, L. D. (2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shedd, C. (2011). Countering the carceral continuum: The legacy of mass incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 865–871. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00748.x.
Spoth, R. L., Kavanagh, K. A., & Dishion, T. (2002). Family-centered preventive intervention science: Toward benefits to larger populations of children, youth, and families. Prevention Science, 3, 145–152. doi:10.1023/A:1019924615322.
Steinberg, L. (2008). Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 18(2), 3–14.
Strach, P. (2007). All in the family: The private roots of American public policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2014). U.S. imprisonment rate continues to drop amid falling crime rates [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/about/news-room/press-releases/2014/03/14/us-imprisonment-rate-continues-to-drop-amid-falling-crime-rates.
Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Travis, J., McBride, E. C., & Solomon, A. L. (2005). Families left behind: The hidden costs of incarceration and reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Tseng, V. (2012). The uses of research in policy and practice. SRCD Social Policy Report, 26(2), 1, 3–16.
Wakefield, S., & Wildeman, C. (2011). Mass imprisonment and racial disparities in childhood behavioral problems. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 791–792. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00741.x.
Weiss, C. H. (1999). Research–policy linkages: How much influence does social science research have? In UNESCO, World Social Science report 1999 (pp. 194–205). Paris: UNESCO.
Acknowledgements
Sincere appreciation is expressed to Joyce Arditti, Tom Corbett, and Michael Massoglia for their insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bogenschneider, K. (2015). Policy Commentary: The Research Evidence Policymakers Need to Build Better Public Policy for Children of Incarcerated Parents. In: Poehlmann-Tynan, J. (eds) Children’s Contact with Incarcerated Parents. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16625-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16625-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16624-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16625-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)