Skip to main content

Citizen Science: Connecting to Nature Through Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mass Collaboration and Education

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 16))

Abstract

Citizen science projects represent an important example of mass collaboration at a global scale where nonscientists can contribute to science research across geographical locations. To more broadly and deeply capitalize on the potential for citizen science to invigorate inquiry-based science at school, we need to better understand how and why citizen science opportunities are taken up by particular teachers. In this chapter, we offer a framework for the analysis of conditions that influence voluntary participation in citizen science efforts. The framework is developed with empirical data from a longitudinal case study. The framework focuses on four dimensions that contributed sustained and evolving participation: (1) alignment between the citizen science opportunity with personal interests and teaching goals, (2) access to a networked community with curricular resources and a technical infrastructure, (3) an integrated indoor and outdoor classroom space that promoted place-based inquiry opportunities, and (4) a set of collaborative practices and networked opportunities that created conditions for an expanding set of partnerships. We close with a discussion of how the design of the socio-technical dimensions of citizen science efforts might be informed by both ethnographic and quantitative studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Gulf of Maine Research Institute (GMRI) is a nonprofit marine science center located in Portland, Maine. GMRI was incorporated in 1968, with the mission of laying the foundation for a new genre of marine science, education, and community institution, including translating rigorous science into engaging formal and informal educational materials.

  2. 2.

    Since 2002, the state of Maine, as a result of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative, has had a program that equips every middle school student with his or her own laptop computer for use at school and home, and all schools are equipped with high-speed wireless networks, technical assistance, and access to Department of Education-sponsored professional development.

  3. 3.

    Our dataset included 22 e-mails, eight from the Vital Signs staff (primarily the project coordinator, who also ran the professional development and developed most of the curriculum) to Paulson and 14 from Paulson to the Vital Signs staff. We coded 41 unique segments of these e-mails that represented collaborative practices, 29 from Paulson and 12 from the Vital Signs staff.

References

  • Ardoin, N. M., Schuh, J. S., & Gould, R. (2012). Exploring the dimensions of place: A confirmatory factor analysis of data from three ecoregional sites. Environmental Education Research, 18, 583–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 462–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What do we think we know and what do we need to learn? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 1008–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C. K. (2014). The digital youth network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Mercier, E., Pea, R., Steinbock, D., Walter, S., … Tyson, K. (2009, June). Repertoires of collaborative practice: Theoretical introduction and background. In C. O’Malley, D. D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), CSCL’09 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 25–27). New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343, 1436–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1099–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the way people learn. Change, 32, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, R. (1984). Arguments for using biography in understanding teacher thinking. In R. Halkes & J. K. Olson (Eds.), Teacher thinking (pp. 98–123). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, R. L., & Raymond, D. (1989). Studying the nature and development of teachers’ knowledge using collaborative autobiography. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, R. L., Raymond, D., McCue, G., & Yamagishi, L. (1992). Collaborative autobiography and the teacher’s voice. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 51–98). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese-Barton, A. M. (2012). Citizen(s’) science. A response to “The future of citizen science.” Democracy and Education, 20. Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss2/12/

  • Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). Retrieved from http://www.coppa.org

  • Collins, A. (2016). A brief history of mass collaboration: How innovations over time have enabled people to work together more effectively. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., Feinkohl, I., Jirschitzka, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2016). Mass collaboration as co-evolution of cognitive and social systems. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. (2016). Stigmergic collaboration: A framework for understanding and designing mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fickel, L. (1999, April). Democracy is messy: Exploring the beliefs and personal theories of a high school social studies teacher. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2016). Exploring, understanding, and designing innovative socio-technical environments for fostering and supporting mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, T., & Waitt, D. (2011). Creating a successful citizen science model to detect and report invasive species. BioScience, 61, 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, J. (1999, April). Considering the professional community: An analysis of key ideas, intellectual roots, and future challenges. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F. (1992). Sponsoring the teacher’s voice: Teachers’ lives and teacher development. In A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 110–121). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halatchliyski, I., Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, B. K. (2014). A “sense of place” in public participation in scientific research. Science Education, 98, 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., & Foldit Void Crushers Group (2011). Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18, 1175–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk, C. A. (2005). Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 672–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. (2003). Connecting with the content: How teacher interest affects student interest in a core course (Electronic thesis or dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu

  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: A qualitative approach to connect households and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. P., & Tippins, D. (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajak, E., & Blase, J. (1989). The impact of teachers’ personal lives on professional role enactment: A qualitative analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 283–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parise, L., & Spillane, J. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrichi, M. (2011, April). Threats to using mass collaboration in education. Paper presented at the 7th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, B., & Means, B. (2004). Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: Analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 294–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. R. (1992). The influence of prior experiences on pedagogical constructs of traditional and nontraditional preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. R. (1996). Epistemological antecedents to culturally relevant and constructivist classroom curricula: A longitudinal study of teachers’ contrasting world views. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views on knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Carney, K., Gyuk, G., Borne, K., Wallin, J., … Planetarium, A. (2009). Citizen science: Status and research directions for the coming decade. AGB Stars and Related Phenomenastro 2010. Position Paper at the Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippel, M., Schaefer, D., Mistree, F., & Panchal, J. H. (2009). Fostering collaborative learning and mass-customization of education in a graduate engineering design course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., … Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, N. M., Shirk, J. L., Fee, J., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Who poses the question?: Using citizen science to help K-12 teachers meet the mandate for inquiry. In J. L. Dickinson & R. Bonney (Eds.), Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research (pp. 179–190). Ithaka, NY: Comstock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., Bascom, D., & Cabral, A. (2000). Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344, 583–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Koloa, Hawaii. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Cyberlearning program (Grant REC-1124568) and Learning in Informal and Formal Environments Science of Learning Center, a National Science Foundation-funded (Grant REC-354453) effort seeking to understand and advance human learning through a simultaneous focus on implicit, informal, and formal learning, thus cultivating generalizable interdisciplinary theories that can guide the design of effective new technologies and learning environments. We also acknowledge and thank “Mr. Paulson,” the Vital Signs staff members, and the other teachers, students, and parents who contributed their time and invaluable expertise and ideas to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigid Barron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barron, B., Martin, C.K., Mertl, V., Yassine, M. (2016). Citizen Science: Connecting to Nature Through Networks. In: Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., Jeong, H. (eds) Mass Collaboration and Education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13535-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13536-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics