Skip to main content

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): A Review of the Reported Validity Evidence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 54))

Abstract

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox et al. Br J Psychiatr 150:782–786, 1987) is used internationally for the detection of postpartum depression in women. We reviewed the validity evidence of the EPDS and examined the extent to which the reported evidence is in line with the modern view of validity. Of the 57 articles included, 30 (52.6 %) included internal consistency, 29 (51 %) discussed predictive validity, 27 (47.4 %) reported on concurrent validity, 16 (28.1 %) studies addressed the internal structure of the EPDS, and 15 (26.3 %) included convergent validity. Fewer articles reviewed response processes (1.8 %), six (10.5 %) discussed content validity of the scale, five (8.8 %) addressed face validity of the EPDS, three studies (5.3 %) discussed discriminant validity, and two studies (3.5 %) included consequences. Certain sources of validity evidence such as response processes and consequences need to be accumulated to strengthen the score inferences of the EPDS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in this review.

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in this review.

  • *Alvarado-Esquivel, C., Sifuentes-Alvarez, A., Salas-Martinez, C., & Martinez-Garcia, S. (2006). Validation of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale in a population of puerperal women in Mexico. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 2, 33–38. doi:10.1186/1745-0179-2-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auewarakul, C., Downing, S. M., Jaturatamrong, U., & Praditsuwan, R. (2005). Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: An evaluative study of assessment methods. Medical Education, 39(3), 276–283. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02090.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Aydin, N., Inandi, T., Yigit, A., & Hodoglugil, N. N. S. (2004). Validation of the Turkish version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale among women within their first postpartum year. Social Psychiatry, 39, 483–486. doi:10.1007/s00127-004-0770-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Banerjee, N., Banerjee, A., Kriplani, A., Saxena, S., & Banerjee, A. (2000). Evaluation of Postpartum depression using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a rural community in India. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 46(1), 74–75. doi:10.1177/002076400004600109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. E., Chaney, B., Piazza-Gardner, A. K., & Chavarria, E. A. (2013). Validity and reliability reporting practices in the field of health education and behavior: A review of seven journals. Health Education & Behavior. doi:10.1177/1090198113483139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, A., & Foulds, G. A. (1978). Delusions-symptoms-states inventory state of anxiety and depression (manual) (pp. 1–14). Berkshire: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Benjamin, D., Chandramohan, A., Annie, I. K., Prasad, J., & Jacob, K. S. (2005). Validation of the Tamil version of the Edinburgh Post-partum Depression Scale. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 55(3), 241–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Benvenuti, P., Ferrara, M., Niccolai, C., Valoriani, V., & Cox, J. (1999). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Validation for an Italian sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 53, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergink, V., Kooistra, L., Lambregtse-van den Berg, M., Wignen, H., Bunevicius, R., van Baar, A., & Pop, V. (2011). Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 70, 385–389. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Berle, J. O., Aarre, T. F., Mykletun, A., Dahl, A. A., & Holsten, F. (2003). Screening for postnatal depression: Validation of the Norwegian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 76, 151–156. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00082-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Boyce, P., Stubbs, J., & Todd, A. (1993). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Validation for an Australian sample. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 27(3), 472–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Brouwers, E. P., van Baar, A. L., & Pop, V. J. (2001). Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51(5), 659–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, J. (2010). Life after birth. Therapy Today, 21(4), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bunevičius, A., Kusminskas, L., & Bunevičius, R. (2009). Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 45(7), 544–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Carpiniello, B., Pariante, C. M., Serri, F., Costa, G., & Carta, M. G. (1997). Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Italy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 18(4), 280–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Chabrol, H., & Teissedre, F. (2004). Relation between Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores at 2–3 days and 4–6 weeks postpartum. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22(1), 33–39. doi:10.1080/02646830310001643067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J., Rosenberg, S. L., & Koons, H. H. (2008). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 397–412. doi:10.1177/0013164407310130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J., Bowen, D., & Church, K. (2010). Sources of validity evidence for educational and psychological tests: A follow-up study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 732–774. doi:10.1177/0013164410379323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogill, S. R., Caplan, H. L., Alexandra, H., Robson, K. M., & Kumar, R. (1986). Impact of maternal postnatal depression on cognitive development of young children. British Medical Journal, 292, 1165–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., & Holden, J. (2003). Perinatal mental health: A guide to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). London: Gaskell.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150(6), 782–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *De Bruin, G. P., Swartz, L., Tomlinson, M., Cooper, P. J., & Molteno, C. (2004). The factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a South African peri-urban settlement. South African Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 113–121. doi:10.1177/008124630403400107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Dennis, C. L., Janssen, P. A., & Singer, J. (2004). Identifying women at‐risk for postpartum depression in the immediate postpartum period. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110(5), 338–346. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00337.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, C., Heaman, M., & Vigod, S. (2012). Epidemiology of postpartum depressive symptoms among Canadian women: Regional and national results from a cross-sectional survey. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 57(9), 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Downie, J., Wynaden, D., McGowan, S., Juliff, D., Axten, C., Fitzpatrick, L., Ogilvie, S., & Painter, S. (2003). Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to achieve best practice standards. Nursing and Health Sciences, 5, 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Felice, E., Saliba, J., Grech, V., & Cox, J. (2006). Validation of the Maltese version of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 9(2), 75–80. doi:10.1007/s00737-005-0099-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Garcia-Esteve, L., Ascaso, C., Ojuel, J., & Navarro, P. (2003). Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in Spanish mothers. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75(1), 71–76. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00020-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gausia, K., Fisher, C., Algin, S., & Oosthuizen, J. (2007). Validation of the Bangla version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for a Bangladeshi sample. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 25(4), 308–315. doi:10.1080/02646830701644896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ghubash, R., Abou-Saleh, M. T., & Daradkeh, T. K. (1997). The validity of the Arabic Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 32(8), 474–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Godderis, R., Adair, C. E., & Brager, N. (2009). Applying new techniques to an old ally: A qualitative validation study of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Women and Birth, 22(1), 17–23. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2008.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. P., Cooper, B., Eastwood, M. R., Kedward, H. B., & Shepherd, M. (1970). A standardized psychiatric interview for use in community surveys. British Journal of Preventive & Social Medicine, 24(1), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan, D. (2011). A mother’s brain knows. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 23(11), 1188–1189. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02175.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Guedeney, N., & Fermanian, J. (1998). Validation study of the French version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): New results about use and psychometric properties. European Psychiatry, 13(2), 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Guedeney, N., Fermanian, J., Guelfi, J. D., & Kumar, R. C. (2000). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the detection of major depressive disorders in early postpartum: Some concerns about false negatives. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hanlon, C., Medhin, G., Alem, A., Araya, M., Abdulahi, A., Hughes, M., Tesfaye, M., Wondimagegn, D., Patel, V., & Prince, M. (2008). Detecting perinatal common mental disorders in Ethiopia: Validation of the self-reporting questionnaire and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Journal of Affective Disorders, 108(3), 251–262. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Validity and the consequences of test interpretation and use. Social Indicators Research, 103, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures: An overview. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jadresic, E., Araya, R., & Jara, C. (1995). Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in Chilean postpartum women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16, 187–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajehei, M., & Doherty, M. (2012). Childbirth in pleasure and ecstasy: A fountain of hormones and chemicals. International Journal of Childbirth Education, 27(3), 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kheirabadi, G. R., Maracy, M. R., Akbaripour, S., & Masaeli, N. (2012). Psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a sample of Iranian women. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 37(1), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Krantz, I., Eriksson, B., Lundquist-Persson, C., Ahlberg, B. M., & Nilstun, T. (2008). Screening for postpartum depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): An ethical analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 36(2), 211–216. doi:10.1177/1403494807085392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzi, R. G., Bert, S. C., & Jacobs, B. K. (2009). Depression among a sample of first-time adolescent and adult mothers. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 22(4), 194–202. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6171.2009.00199.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lau, Y., Wang, Y., Yin, L., Chan, K. S., & Guo, X. (2010). Validation of the mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Chengdu mothers. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(9), 1139–1151. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lawrie, T. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., de Jager, M., & Berk, M. (1998). Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale on a cohort of South African women. South African Medical Journal, 88(10), 1340–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. E. (1995). Women look at their experience of pregnancy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 16(3), 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lee, D. T., Yip, S. K., Chiu, H. F., Leung, T. Y., Chan, K. P., Chau, I. O., Leung, H. C., & Chung, T. K. (1998). Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese women: Validation of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 172(5), 433–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leonardou, A. A., Zervas, Y. M., Papageorgiou, C. C., Marks, M. N., Tsartsara, E. C., Antsaklis, A. A., & Soldatos, C. R. (2009). Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and prevalence of postnatal depression at two months postpartum in a sample of Greek mothers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27(1), 28–39. doi:10.1080/02646830802004909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leverton, T. J., & Elliott, S. A. (2000). Is the EPDS a magic wand?: A comparison of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and health visitor report as predictors of diagnosis on the present state examination. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 18(4), 279–296. doi:10.1080/713683048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Logsdon, M. C., Usui, W. M., & Nering, M. (2009). Validation of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for adolescent mothers. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 12, 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Mazhari, S., & Nakhaee, N. (2007). Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in an Iranian sample. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 10(6), 293–297. doi:10.1007/s00737-007-0204-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *McCoy, S. J. B., Beal, J. M., Payton, M. E., Stewart, A. L., DeMers, A. M., & Watson, G. H. (2005). Correlations of visual analog scales with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Journal of Affective Disorders, 86(2), 295–297. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.01.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, S. T., & David, S. R. (1990). Trends in reporting psychometric properties of scales used in counselling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(1), 113–115. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.37.1.113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.),   Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Milgrom, J., Ericksen, J., Negri, L., & Gemmill, A. W. (2005). Screening for postnatal depression in routine primary care: Properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Australian sample. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39(9), 833–839. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01660.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Milgrom, J., Mendelsohn, J., & Gemmill, A. W. (2011). Does postnatal depression screening work? Throwing out the bathwater, keeping the baby. Journal of Affective Disorders, 132(3), 301–310. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.09.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Montazeri, A., Torkan, B., & Omidvari, S. (2007). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. BMC Psychiatry, 7(1), 11. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-7-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Murray, L., & Carothers, A. D. (1990). The validation of the Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale on a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 157(2), 288–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Navarro, P., Ascaso, C., Garcia-Esteve, L., Aguado, J., Torres, A., & Martín-Santos, R. (2007). Postnatal psychiatric morbidity: A validation study of the GHQ-12 and the EPDS as screening tools. General Hospital Psychiatry, 29(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Pallant, J., Miller, R., & Tennant, A. (2006). Evaluation of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale using Rasch analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 6(28), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcells, D. A. (2010). Women’s mental health nursing: Depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 17(9), 813–820. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01588.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Phillips, J., Charles, M., Sharpe, L., & Matthey, S. (2009). Validation of the subscales of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a sample of women with unsettled infants. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118(1), 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Pitanupong, J., Liabsuetrakul, T., & Vittayanont, A. (2007). Validation of the Thai Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening postpartum depression. Psychiatry Research, 149(1), 253–259. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2005.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Pop, V. J., Komproe, I. H., & Van Son, M. J. (1992). Characteristics of the Edinburgh post natal depression scale in The Netherlands. Journal of Affective Disorders, 26(2), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualls, A. L., & Moss, A. D. (1996). The degree of congruence between test standards and test documentation within journal publications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(2), 209–214. doi:10.1177/0013164496056002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Regmi, S., Sligl, W., Carter, D., Grut, W., & Seear, M. (2002). A controlled study of postpartum depression among Nepalese women: Validation of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale in Kathmandu. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 7(4), 378–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Reichenheim, M., Morales, C. L., Oliveira, A., & Lobato, G. (2011). Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): Empirical evidence for a general factor. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(93), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Santos, I., Matijasevich, A., Tavares, B., da Cruz Lima, A., Riegel, R., & Lopes, B. (2007). Comparing validity of Edinburg scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 3(18), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, L., Brock, R., O’Hara, M., Gorman, L., & Engeldinger, J. (2011). Disseminating perinatal depression screening as a public health initiative: A Train-the-Trainer approach. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(6), 814–821. doi:10.1007/s10995-010-0644-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Shelton, J., & Herrick, K. (2009). Comparison of scoring methods and thresholds of the General Health Questionnaire-12 with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in English women. Public Health, 123(12), 789–793. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2009.09.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaney, K. L., Tkatchouk, M., Gabriel, S. M., & Maraun, M. D. (2009). Psychometric assessment and reporting practice: Incongruence between theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(6), 465–476. doi:10.1177/0734282909335781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaney, K. L., Tkatchouk, M., Gabriel, S. M., Ferguson, L. P., Knudsen, J. R., & Legere, J. C. (2010). A review of psychometric assessment and reporting practices: An examination of measurement-oriented versus non-measurement-oriented domains. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(3), 246–259. doi:10.1177/0829573510375549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Small, R., Lumley, J., Yelland, J., & Brown, S. (2007). The performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in English speaking and non-English speaking populations in Australia. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42(1), 70–78. doi:10.1007/s00127-006-0134-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snaith, R. P., Constantopoulos, A. A., Jardine, M. Y., & McGuffin, P. (1978). A clinical scale for the self-assessment of irritability. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 132(2), 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., Robins, E., Kuriansky, J., & Gurland, B. (1975). Preliminary report of the reliability of research diagnostic criteria (RDC) applied to psychiatric case records. In A. Sudilovsky & R. Beer (Eds.), Prediction in psychopharmacology: Preclinical and clinical correlates. San Diego: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Teissèdre, F., & Chabrol, H. (2004). Detecting women at risk for postnatal depression using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 2 to 3 days postpartum. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(1), 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Teng, H. W., Hsu, C. S., Shih, S. M., Lu, M. L., Pan, J. J., & Shen, W. W. (2005). Screening postpartum depression with the Taiwanese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46(4), 261–265. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tesfaye, M., Hanlon, C., Wondimagegn, D., & Alem, A. (2009). Detecting postnatal common mental disorders in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale and Kessler scales. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122(1), 102–108. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Töreki, A., Andó, B., Keresztúri, A., Sikovanyecz, J., Dudas, R., Janka, Z., Kozinszky, Z., & Pál, A. (2012). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Translation and antepartum validation for a Hungarian sample. Midwifery, 29(4), 308–315. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.01011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traviss, G. D., West, R. M., & House, A. O. (2012). Maternal mental health and its association with infant growth at 6 months in ethnic groups: Results from the Born-in-Bradford Birth Cohort Study. PLoS One, 7(2), e30707. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Vivilaki, V. G., Dafermos, V., Kogevinas, M., Bitsios, P., & Lionis, C. (2009). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Translation and validation for a Greek sample. BMC Public Health, 9(1), 329. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wang, Y., Guo, X., Lau, Y., Chan, K. S., Yin, L., & Chen, J. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(6), 813–823. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Werrett, J., & Clifford, C. (2006). Validation of the Punjabi version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(2), 227–236. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wickberg, B., & Hwang, C. P. (1996). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Validation on a Swedish community sample. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 94(3), 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wojcicki, J. M., & Geissler, J. (2013). The Spanish translation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the use of the word “desgraciada”. Transcultural Psychiatry, 50(1), 152–154. doi:10.1177/1363461512475276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrate, R. M., Rooney, A. C., Thomas, P. F., & Cox, J. L. (1985). Postnatal depression and child development: A three-year follow-up study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 622–627. doi:10.1192/bjp.146.6.622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Yawn, B. P., Pace, W., Wollan, P. C., Bertram, S., Kurland, M., Graham, D., & Dietrich, A. (2009). Concordance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess increased risk of depression among postpartum women. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 22(5), 483–491. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2009.05.080155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Psychometrics, handbook of statistics (Vol. 26, pp. 45–79). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Validity as contextualized and pragmatic explanation, and its implications for validation practice. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications (pp. 65–82). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hillary L. McBride .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McBride, H.L., Wiens, R.M., McDonald, M.J., Cox, D.W., Chan, E.K.H. (2014). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): A Review of the Reported Validity Evidence. In: Zumbo, B., Chan, E. (eds) Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 54. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics