Skip to main content

Clustering of Stratified Aggregated Data Using the Aggregate Association Index: Analysis of New Zealand Voter Turnout (1893–1919)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analysis and Modeling of Complex Data in Behavioral and Social Sciences

Abstract

Recently, the Aggregate Association Index (AAI) was proposed to identify the likely association structure between two dichotomous variables of a 2×2 contingency table when only aggregate, or equivalently the marginal, data are available. In this paper we shall explore the utility of the AAI and its features for analysing gendered New Zealand voting data in 11 national elections held between 1893 and 1919. We shall demonstrate that, by using these features, one can identify clusters of homogeneous electorates that share similar voting behaviour between the male and female voters. We shall also use these features to compare the association between gender and voting behaviour across each of the 11 elections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitkin, M., & Hinde, J. P. (1984). Comments to “Tests of significance for 2x2 contingency tables”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 47, 453–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, G. A. (1984). Comments to “Tests of significance for 2x2 contingency tables”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 47, 449–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beh, E. J. (2008). Correspondence analysis of aggregate data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138, 2941–2952.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beh, E. J. (2010). The aggregate association index. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54, 1570–1580.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Payne, C. (1986). Aggregate data, ecological regression and voting transitions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 453–460.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. L., & Steel, D. G. (2001). Simple methods for ecological inference in 2×2 tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 164, 175–192.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., & Davis, B. (1953). An alternative to ecological inference. American Social Review, 18, 665–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1935). The logic of inductive inference (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 98, 39–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcina, A., Gnaldi, M., & Bracalente, B. (2012). A revised Brown and Payne model of voting behaviour applied to the 2009 elections in Italy. Statistical Methods and Applications, 21, 109–119.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1953). Ecological regressions and behavior of individuals. American Social Review, 18, 663–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, I. L., Moore, L., Beh, E. J., & Steel, D. G. (2010). Ecological inference techniques: an empirical evaluation using data describing gender and voter turnout at New Zealand elections, 1893–1919. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 173, 185–213.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • King, G. (1997). A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattin, J., Carroll, J. D., & Green, P. E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. VIC: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plackett, R. L. (1977). The marginal totals of a 2x2 table. Biometrics, 64, 37–42.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, D. G., Beh, E. J., & Chambers, R. L. (2004). The information in aggregate data. In G. King, O. Rosen, & M. Tanner (Eds.), Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies (pp. 51–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, D., Beh, E. J., & Hudson, I. L. (2012). The aggregate association index and its application in the 1893 New Zealand election. In: Proceedings of the 5th ASEARC Conference (pp. 22–25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. (2004). Ecological inference for 2 × 2 tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 167, 385–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Beh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beh, E.J., Tran, D., Hudson, I.L., Moore, L. (2014). Clustering of Stratified Aggregated Data Using the Aggregate Association Index: Analysis of New Zealand Voter Turnout (1893–1919). In: Vicari, D., Okada, A., Ragozini, G., Weihs, C. (eds) Analysis and Modeling of Complex Data in Behavioral and Social Sciences. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06692-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics