Skip to main content

Does Meditation Give Us Unique Insight into Ultimate Reality? The Ethical Aim of Buddhism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Meditation – Neuroscientific Approaches and Philosophical Implications

Part of the book series: Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality ((SNCS,volume 2))

Abstract

The first part of the paper focuses on the narrow philosophical question of whether one can know ultimate reality through meditation. I argue that such knowledge is not possible, that experience is always mediated. Interpreting the Buddha naturalistically, I argue that his aim was less about knowledge and more about providing insight into how one can live a flourishing life. In the second section of the paper, I discuss ways in which a philosophical approach (broadly understood) may benefit a team engaging in neurological studies of meditation. Such an approach might help in linguistic analysis, as well as in understanding the cross-cultural context of traditional meditation traditions. I further suggest that mindfulness might make one more open to scientific discovery. Finally, I propose that the study of meditation will both benefit and be benefited by theories of extended cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for instance Ellwood (1980), James (1902), Stace (1972), Underhill (1967).

  2. 2.

    This is part of a longer discussion to be found at: http://www.londonbuddhistVihara.org/med_aware/pmedinsight.htm/

  3. 3.

    This section “The Buddha as Healer”, entitled Meditation, is part of a larger discussion found at: http://www.buddhanet.net/cmdsg/Gettings8.htm. In fairness, I want to note that the discussion begins with a different focus on the aim of meditation, one that aims primarily at mental development. I will return to this aim later in the paper.

  4. 4.

    Hanson distinguishes between “seeing as” and “seeing that,” but these are distinctions made in seeing-talk, “in our seeing concept” (p. 21), but they are logical distinctions, not different steps in knowing.

  5. 5.

    For an additional argument, see Polanyi (1966).

  6. 6.

    This is a device that induces an altered state in a participant, developed originally by Bob Masters and Jean Houston. One stands in a cradle that is hung by a rope so that it swings freely; the participant is blindfolded and, in my case, had headphones playing white noise, so that the combination of loss of spatial orientation and minor sensory deprivation puts one into an altered state which can then be guided by the experimenter. I used the device only a short time before turning to a more analytic approach to the mystical state.

  7. 7.

    I believe my arguments against experience being a two-step process apply here.

  8. 8.

    To be fair to Suzuki, it should be pointed out that he also sometimes uses language that seems to say that one experiences reality. He says, for instance, “The Zen master had taken hold of the real thing” (1972, p. 3). But, I think the direction of his thought is to reject these attempts in favor of another approach.

  9. 9.

    As well as his newer Confessions of a Buddhist atheist (2010).

  10. 10.

    I am using mindfulness in a general way referring to Eastern approaches. See Schmidt (2011) for an analysis of the differences in mindfulness in the East and West.

  11. 11.

    See Flanagan (2011, p. 106).

  12. 12.

    So, at this point, you may want to stop reading this chapter and just sit!

  13. 13.

    Certainly virtues such as compassion, altruistic joy, equanimity, truthfulness, patience, and vigor would make both lists.

  14. 14.

    Or whether there exists a human nature; the Buddhists seem to deny it.

  15. 15.

    For instance, see Clark (1997, 2008).

References

  • Aristotle. 1962. Nichomachian ethics. Trans. Oswald, Martin. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.H. 2006. Zen-brain reflections: Reviewing recent developments in meditation and states of consciousness. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, S. 1997. Buddhism without beliefs. New York: Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, S. 2010. Confessions of a Buddhist atheist. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, M. forthcoming. Cognition without borders: “Third wave” socially distributed cognition and relational autonomy. Cognitive Systems Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.007

  • Clark, A. 1997. Being here: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. A Bradford Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. 1982. Selfless persons: Imagery and thought in Theravada Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukt, V.D. 2006. Neurscience of meditation. TSW Holistic Health and Medicine 1: 275–289. doi:10.1100/tswhhm.2006.244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood Jr., R.S. 1980. Mysticism and religion. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O. 2011. The Bodhisatva’s brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, R. 2009. What the Buddha thought. London: Equinox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., K. Reiner, and N. Meiran. 2012. “Mind the trap”: Mindfulness practice reduces cognitive rigidity. PLoS ONE 7(5): e36206. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R.N. 1958. Patterns of discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1963. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1988. An enquiry concerning human understanding. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1973. Logical investigations. Trans. J.N. Findlay. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1902. The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. London: Longmans, Green.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • London Buddhist Vihara. http://www.londonbuddhistvihara.org/med_aware/pmedinsight.htm. Accessed 10 Oct 2012.

  • Lutz, A., J.D. Dunne, and R.J. Davidson. 2007. Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness: an introduction. In Cambridge handbook of consciousness, ed. P. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, and E. Thompson, 499–554. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H.R., and S. Kitayama. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98: 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsella, A. 1985. A category of the human mind: The notion of the person; the notion of the self. In Culture and self: Asian and American perspectives, ed. Anthony Marsella, George DeVos, and Francis Hsu, 281–308. New York: Travistock Publiscations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meditation. http://www.buddhanet.net/cmdsg/getting8.htm. Accessed 10 Oct 2012.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. Colin Smith. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, B. 1994. Anthropology of the self. Boulder: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1960. Joyful wisdom. Trans. Common, Thomas. New York: Fredrick Ungar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. 2003. The geography of thought. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E., and Y. Miyamoto. 2005. The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 9: 467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont Jr., H. 1991. Rights-bearing individuals and role-bearing persons. In Rules, rituals, and responsibilities, ed. Mary I. Bockover, 71–101. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. 2011. Mindfulness in east and west – is it the same? In Neuroscience, consciousness and spirituality, ed. H. Walach, S. Schmidt, and W.B. Jonas, 23–38. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stace, W.T. 1972. Mysticism and philosophy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D.T. 1972. What is Zen. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D.T. 1977. An introduction to Zen Buddhism. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweder, R.A., and E.J. Bourne. 1984. Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion, ed. R.A. Schweder and R.A. Levine, 158–199. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tart, C.T. 1975. Science, states of consciousness, and spiritual experiences: The need for state-specific sciences. In Transpersonal psychologies, ed. C. Tart, 11–58. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, E. 1967. Mysticism: A study in the nature and development of man’s spiritual consciousness. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, J., S. Nichols, and S. Stich. 2008. Normativity and epistemic intuitions. In Experimental philosophy, ed. J. Knobe and S. Nichols, 17–47. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoyt L. Edge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edge, H.L. (2014). Does Meditation Give Us Unique Insight into Ultimate Reality? The Ethical Aim of Buddhism. In: Schmidt, S., Walach, H. (eds) Meditation – Neuroscientific Approaches and Philosophical Implications. Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01634-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics