Skip to main content

Remediation of Physical Examination Skills

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remediation in Medical Education

Abstract

Novice clinicians demonstrate a diversity of physical examination (PE) skill levels. In this chapter, we briefly name and define common domains where learners struggle with PE skills. We explore institutional and educator constraints to effectively assess physical exam skills, describe methods of identifying learners needing remediation, and describe potential tools that can be used in this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Editor’s note: We refer the reader to the first edition of this book for detailed cases where the authors describe remediation techniques for many of the struggles listed here.

References

  1. AAMC Curriculum reports: ultrasound use at US and Canadian medical schools. 2020. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/interactive-data/ultrasound-use-us-and-canadian-medical-schools. Accessed 29 Dec 2022.

  2. So S, Patel RM, Orebaugh SL. Ultrasound imaging in medical student education: impact on learning anatomy and physical diagnosis. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:176–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Bell F, et al. The evolution of an integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 9-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015;7(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-015-0035-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. TraumaInformedcare.chcs.org. Understanding the effects of trauma on health fact sheet. 2017. Accessed 29 Dec 2022.

  5. Wilkerson L, Lee M. Assessing physical examination skills of senior medical students: knowing how versus knowing when. Acad Med. 2003;78:S30–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herbers JE Jr, Noel GL, Cooper GS, Harvey J, Pangaro LN, Weaver MJ. How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:202–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH. Shortcomings in the evaluation of students’ clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med. 1999;74:842–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harwick L, Cleland J, Kitto S. Sending messages: how faculty influence professional teaching and learning. Med Teach. 2017;39:987–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Faustinella F, Jacobs R. The decline of clinical skills: a challenge for medical schools. Int J Med Educ. 2018;9:195–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med. Mar 18 2003;138:476–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harden RM. What is an OSCE? Med Teach. 1988;10(1):19–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barman A. Critiques on the objective structured clinical examination. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2005;34(8):478–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frye AW, Richards BF, Philp EB, Philp JR. Is it worth it? A look at the costs and benefits of an OSCE for second-year medical students. Med Teach. 1989;11:291–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang A, Chou CL, Teherani A, Hauer KE. Clinical skills-related learning goals of senior medical students after performance feedback. Med Educ. 2011;45:878–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dornan T, Scherpbier A, Boshuizen H. Towards valid measures of self-directed clinical learning. Med Educ. 2003;37:983–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, et al. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Med Educ. 2011;45:636–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saxena V, O’Sullivan PS, Teherani A, Irby DM, Hauer KE. Remediation techniques for student performance problems after a comprehensive clinical skills assessment. Acad Med. 2009;84:669–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bickley LS. Bates’ guide to physical examination and history taking. 11th ed. Walters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. DeGowin RLB, D. D. DeGowin’s diagnostic examination. 9th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg C. A practice guide to clinical medicine. 2009. http://meded.ucsd.edu/clinicalmed/. Accessed 29 Dec 2022.

  21. Clark REV, A. Transfer of training principles for instructional design. Educ Technol Res Dev. 1985;33(2):113–23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perkins DNS, G. Transfer of learning. International encyclopedia of education. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chou CL. Physical examination teaching curriculum for senior medical students. Med Educ. 2005;39:1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nishigori H, Masuda K, Kikukawa M, et al. A model teaching session for the hypothesis-driven physical examination. Med Teach. 2011;33:410–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yudkowsky R, Otaki J, Lowenstein T, Riddle J, Nishigori H, Bordage G. A hypothesis-driven physical examination learning and assessment procedure for medical students: initial validity evidence. Med Educ. 2009;43:729–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Simel DL, Rennie D, eds. The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis. New York: McGraw Hill Medical, 2008. https://jamanetwork.com/collections/6257/the-rational-clinical-examination.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahlia Spector .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spector, T., Fung, CC., Olson, R. (2023). Remediation of Physical Examination Skills. In: Kalet, A., Chou, C.L. (eds) Remediation in Medical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32403-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32404-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics