Skip to main content

The Metacognitive Competency: Becoming a Master Adaptive Learner

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remediation in Medical Education

Abstract

All of us possess mental models for how to learn; however, these models are usually implicit and not adequate for managing the exponential increase in content load and critical thinking necessary for modern healthcare practice. Ideally, we explicitly monitor our own learning, engaging in metacognition and adapting our learning approaches in a variety of contexts. Here the authors present the Master Adaptive Learner (MAL) framework, which offers a comprehensive, integrated evidence-informed model for learning in medicine. The authors contend that this framework can both inform remediation and form the basis of teaching and learning in the health professions more generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cutrer WB, Miller B, Pusic MV, Mejicano G, Mangrulkar RS, Gruppen LD, Hawkins RE, Skochelak SE, Moore DE Jr. Fostering the development of Master Adaptive Learners: a conceptual model to guide skill acquisition in medical education. Acad Med. 2017;92:70–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thurstone L. The learning curve equation. Psychol. Review. 1919;34:278–86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mylopoulos M, Brydges R, Woods NN, Manzone J, Schwartz DL. Preparation for future learning: a missing competency in health professions education? Med Educ. 2016;50:115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009;84:1022–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dweck CS. Growth. Br J Educ Psychol. 2015;85:242–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning: theories, measures, and outcomes. In: International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2015. p. 541–6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:290–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manag Learning Educ. 2005;4:193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapp K, Thomas P. Which cognitive processes are involved in the Master Adaptive Learner? In: Cutrer W, Pusic M, editors. The Master Adaptive Learner. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. p. 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paunesku D, Walton GM, Romero C, Smith EN, Yeager DS, Dweck CS. Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychol Sci. 2015;2015(26):784–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steenhof N, Woods NN, Van Gerven PWM, Mylopoulos M. Productive failure as an instructional approach to promote future learning. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2019;2019(24):739–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pusic M, Cutrer W, Santen S. How does Master Adaptive Learning advance expertise? In: Cutrer WB, Pusic M, Gruppen LD, Hammoud M, Santen S, editors. The Master Adaptive Learner. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. p. 10–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown PC, Roediger HL III, McDaniel MA. Make it stick: the science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Duhigg C. The power of habit: why we do what we do in life and business. New York: Random House; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mylopoulos M, Woods NN. When I say … adaptive expertise. Med Educ. 2017;51:685–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapur M. Productive failure. Cogn Instr. 2008;26:379–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Colvin G. Talent is overrated: what really separates world-class performers from everybody Else. New York: Portfolio/Penguin; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lajoie SP, Gube M. Adaptive expertise in medical education: accelerating learning trajectories by fostering self-regulated learning. Med Teach. 2018;40:809–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dignath C, Buettner G, Langfeldt HP. How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?. A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educl research. Review. 2008;3:101–29.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ten Cate TJ, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide no. 59. Med Teach. 2011;33:961–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT. Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess. 2011;5:1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stoeger H, Ziegler A. Evaluation of a classroom based training to improve self-regulation in time management tasks during homework activities with fourth graders. Metacogn Learn. 2008;3:207–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmerman B, Schunk D, editors. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chi MTH, Feltovich PJ, Glaser R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Sci. 1981;5:121–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwartz DL, Bransford JD, Sears D. Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In: Mestre J, editor. Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective: efficiency and innovation in transfer. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moulton CA, Regehr G, Lingard L, Merritt C, MacRae H. “Slowing down when you should”: initiators and influences of the transition from the routine to the effortful. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1019–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mylopoulos M, Kulasegaram K, Weyman K, Bernstein S, Martimianakis MA. Same but different: exploring mechanisms of learning in a longitudinal integrated clerkship. Acad Med. 2020;95:411–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. How student models of expertise and innovation impact the development of adaptive expertise in medicine. Med Educ. 2009;43:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vygotsky L. Socio-cultural theory. Mind Society. 1978;6:52–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pusic MV, Santen SA, Dekhtyar M, Poncelet AN, Roberts NK, Wilson-Delfosse AL, Cutrer WB. Learning to balance efficiency and innovation for optimal adaptive expertise. Med Teach. 2018;40:820–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 2011;86:1120–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Eva K, Holmboe E, van der Vleuten C. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad Med. 2010;85:1212–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Duffy FD, Holmboe ES. Self-assessment in lifelong learning and improving performance in practice: physician know thyself. JAMA. 2006;296:1137–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80:S46–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Croskerry P. The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1223–331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Deiorio NM, Carney PA, Kahl LE, Bonura EM, Juve AM. Coaching: a new model for academic and career achievement. Med Educ Online. 2016;2006(21):33480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dyche L, Epstein RM. Curiosity and medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45:663–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Driessen EW, van Tartwijk J, Overeem K, Vermunt JD, van der Vleuten CPM. Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39:1230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. West CP, Durning SJ, O’Brien BC, Coverdale JH, Roberts LW. The USMLE step 1 examination: can pass/fail make the grade? Acad Med. 2020;95:1287–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chan T, Sebok-Syer S, Thoma B, Wise A, Sherbino J, Pusic M. Learning analytics in medical education assessment: the past, the present, and the future. AEM Educ Train. 2018;22:178–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dannefer EF, Henson LC. The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. Acad Med. 2007;82:493–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Menachery EP, Knight AM, Kolodner K, Wright SM. Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:440–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Borrell-Carrió F, Epstein RM. Preventing errors in clinical practice: a call for self-awareness. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:310–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CPM, Lingard L. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Med Educ. 2014;48:713–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pusic MV, Boutis K, Santen S, Cutrer W. How does master adaptive learning ensure optimal pathways to clinical expertise? In: Cutrer WB, Pusic M, Gruppen LD, Hammoud M, Santen S, editors. The Master Adaptive Learner. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. p. 174–92.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Senge P. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Random House; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kegan R, Laskow LL. An everyone culture: becoming a deliberately developmental organization. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rogers EM, Adhikarya R. Diffusion of innovations: an up-to-date review and commentary. Ann Internat Commun Assoc. 1979;3:67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gruppen LD, Irby DM, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. Conceptualizing learning environments in the health professions. Acad Med. 2019;94:969–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wong BM, Holmboe ES. Transforming the academic faculty perspective in graduate medical education to better align educational and clinical outcomes. Acad Med. 2016;91:473–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gonzalo JD, Chang A, Dekhtyar M, Starr SR, Holmboe E, Wolpaw DR. Health systems science in medical education: unifying the components to catalyze transformation. Acad Med. 2020;95:1362–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wolff M, Deiorio NM, Juve AM, Richardson J, Gazelle G, Moore M, Santen SA, Hammoud MM. Beyond advising and mentoring: competencies for coaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2021;43:1210–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Darley JM, Batson CD. “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1973;27:100–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fitzgerald FT. Curiosity. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:70–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hidi S, Renninger K. The four-phase model of interest development. Educ Psychol. 2006;41:111–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Petri H. Motivation: theory, research and applications. 4th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory. In: Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Handbook of theories of social psychology: Volume 1. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publishing; 2012. p. 416–37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Rogers D. Which educational interventions improve healthcare professionals’ resilience? Med Teach. 2016;38:1236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Pusic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Howard, N., Pusic, M. (2023). The Metacognitive Competency: Becoming a Master Adaptive Learner. In: Kalet, A., Chou, C.L. (eds) Remediation in Medical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32403-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32404-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics