Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward a Programmatic Approach for Remediation: Evidence-Based Goals for Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remediation in Medical Education

  • 243 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers a series of goals for institutions and programs to standardize remediation systems and processes. These largely evidence-based goals are organized in three temporally sequenced phases: setting up the context for an institution’s remediation system, initiating remediation programs, and follow-through. The resultant aspirational blueprint outlines a process that is effective and compassionate to both learners and remediators while acknowledging limited resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mills LM, Boscardin C, Joyce EA, ten Cate O, O’Sullivan PS. Emotion in remediation: a scoping review of the medical education literature. Med Educ. 2021;55:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardinger K, Garavalia L, Graham MR, et al. Enrollment management strategies in the professional pharmacy program: a focus on progression and retention. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2015;7:199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland JA, Knight L, Rees C, Tracey S, Bond CB. ‘Is it me or is it them?’ Factors influencing assessors’ failure to report underperformance in medical students. Med Educ. 2008;42:800–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalet A, Chou CL, Ellaway RH. To fail is human: remediating remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6:418–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yepes-Rios M, Dudek N, Duboyce R, Curtis J, Allard RJ, Varpio L. The failure to fail underperforming trainees in health professions education: a BEME systematic review; BEME guide no. 42. Med Teach. 2016;38:1092–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellini LM, Kalet A, Englander R. Providing compassionate off-ramps for medical students is a moral imperative. Acad Med. 2019;94:656–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aagaard E, Moscoso L. Practical implications off compassionate off-ramps for medical students. Acad Med. 2019;94:619–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MacKenzie RK, Dowell J, Ayansina D, Cleland JA. Do personality traits assessed on medical school admission predict exit performance? A UK-wide longitudinal cohort study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:365–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hecker K, Norman G. Have admissions committees considered all the evidence? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22:573–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown G, Imel B, Nelson A, Hale LS, Jansen N. Correlations between PANCE performance, physician assistant program grade point average, and selection criteria. J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24:42–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilkinson TJ, McKenzie JM, Ali AN, Rudland J, Carter FA, Bell CJ. Identifying medical students at risk of underperformance from significant stressors. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank JR, Snell L, Englander R, Holmboe ES. Implementing competency-based medical education: moving forward. Med Teach. 2017;39:568–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gruppen LD, Burkhardt JC, Fitzgerald JT, et al. Competency based education: programme design and challenges to implementation. Med Educ. 2016;50:532–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong T, Gilliland WR, Cruess D, Hutchinson J, Morres L, Curtis J, Hewitt-Clarke GS, Durning SJ. A longitudinal study of commonly used admissions measures and disenrollment from medical school and graduate medical education probation or termination from training. Mil Med. 2018;183:e680–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Richard-Eaglin A. Predicting student success in nurse practitioner programs. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29:600–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis D, Dorsey JK, Franks RD, Sackett PR, Searcy CA, Zhao X. Do racial and ethnic group differences in performance on the MCAT exam reflect test bias? Acad Med. 2013;88:593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller C, Stassun K. A test that fails. Nature. 2014;510:303–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aibana O, Swails J, Flores J, Love L. Bridging the gap: holistic review to increase diversity in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2019;94:1137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Robinett K, Kareem R, Reavis K, Quezada S. A multi-pronged, antiracist approach to optimize equity in medical school admissions. Med Educ. 2021;55:1376–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Glazer G, Bankston K, Stacy K. The University of Cincinnati College of nursing case study: bias and discriminatioin in the nursing learning environment. Acad Med. 2020;95:S23–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lucey CR, Saguil A. The consequences of structural racism on MCAT scores and medical school admissions: the past is prologue. Acad Med. 2020;95:351–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rubright JD, Jodoin M, Barone MA. Examining demographics, prior academic performance, and United States Mediical licensing examination scores. Acad Med. 2019;94:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Plews-Ogan ML, Bell TD, Townsend G, Canterbury RJ, Wilkes DS. Acting wisely: eliminating negative bias in medical education—part 2: how can we do better? Acad Med. 2020;95:S16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Teherani A, Hauer KE, Fernandez A, King TE Jr, Lucey C. How small differences in assessed clinical performance amplify to large differences in grades and awards: a cascade with serious consequences for students underrepresented in medicine. Acad Med. 2018;93:1286–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Low D, Pollack SW, Liao ZC, Maestas R, Kirven LE, Eacker AM, Morales LS. Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31:487–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Teherani A, Perez S, Muller-Juge V, Lupton K, Hauer KE. A narrative study of equity in clinical assessment through the antideficit lens. Acad Med. 2020;95:S121–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elks ML, Johnson K, Anachebe NF. Morehouse School of Medicine case study: teacher-learner relationships free of bias and discrimination. Acad Med. 2020;95:S88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ten Cate O. Competency-based postgraduate medical education: past, present and future. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34:Doc69.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Whittaker JL, Ellis R, Hodges PW, et al. Imaging with ultrasound in physical therapy: what is the PT’s scope of practice? A competency-based educational model and training recommendations. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(23):1447–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Croft H, Gilligan C, Rasiah R, Levett-Jones T, Schneider J. Current trends and opportunities for competency assessment in pharmacy education: a literature review. Pharmacy. 2019;7:67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chimea T, Kanji Z, Schmitz S. Assessment of clinical competence in competency-based education. Can J Dent Hyg. 2020;54(2):83–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Knebel E, Puttkammer N, Demes A, Devirois R, Prismy M. Developing a competency-based curriculum in HIV for nursing schools in Haiti. Hum Resour Health. 2008;6:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Baker LR, Phelan S, Woods NN, Boyd VA, Rowland P, Ng SL. Re-envisioning paradigms of education: towards awareness, alignment, and pluralism. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26:1045–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng SL, Kangasjarvi E, Lorello GR, Nemoy L, Brydges R. There shouldn’t be anything wrong with not knowing: epistemologies in simulation. Med Educ. 2019;53:1049–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Baker L, Shing LK, Wright S, Mylopoulos M, Kulasegaram K, Ng S. Aligning and applying the paradigms and practices of education. Acad Med. 2019;94(7):1060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ellaway RH, Chou CL, Kalet AL. Situating remediation: accommodating success and failure in medical education systems. Acad Med. 2018;93:391–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bullock JL, Lai CJ, Lockspeiser T, et al. In pursuit of honors: a multi-institutional study of students’ perceptions of clerkship evaluation and grading. Acad Med. 2019;94:S48–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hays RB, Lawson M, Gray C. Problems presented by medical students seeking support: a possible intervention framework. Med Teach. 2011;33:161–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hauer KE, Lucey CR. Core clerkship grading: the illusion of objectivity. Acad Med. 2019;94:469–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Krasner MS, Epstein RM, Beckman H, et al. Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. JAMA. 2009;302:1284–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD, Werner L, Sood A, Satele D, Wolanskyj AP. The impact of a required longitudinal stress management and resilience training course for first-year medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:1309–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chou CL, Johnston CB, Singh B, et al. A ‘safe space’ for learning and reflection: one school’s design for continuity with a peer group across clinical clerkships. Acad Med. 2011;86:1560–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Disch J. Rethinking mentoring. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:437–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McBride AB, Campbell J, Woods NF, Manson SM. Building a mentoring network. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65:305–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Moore S, Kuol N. Students evaluating teachers: exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching. Teach High Educ. 2005;2005(10):57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stone D, Heen S. Thanks for the feedback: the science and art of receiving feedback well. New York: Penguin Books; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Forsythe A, Johnson S. Thanks, but no-thanks for the feedback. Assess Eval High Educ. 2017;42:850–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4(284):99.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53:76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rougas S, Clyne B, Cianciolo AT, Chan TM, Sherbino J, Yarris LM. An extended validity argument for assessing feedback culture. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27:355–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cleland JA, Cilliers F, van Schalkwyk S. The learning environment in remediation: a review. Clin Teach. 2018;15:13–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Boud D, Molloy E, editors. Feedback in higher and professional education. London: Routledge; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A. Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teach High Educ. 2001;6:269–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gibbs G. How assessment frames student learning. In: Bryan C, Clegg K, editors. Innovative assessment in higher education. London: Routledge; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Poulos A, Mahony MJ. Effectiveness of feedback: the students’ perspective. Assess Eval High Educ. 2008;33:143–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, et al. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:44–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Winstone NE, Nash RA, Parker M, Rowntree J. Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: a systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educ Psychol. 2017;52:17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Carless D, Salter D, Yang M, Lam J. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud High Educ. 2011;36:395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The ‘educational alliance’ as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90:609–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cutrer WB, Miller B, Pusic MV, et al. Fostering the development of master adaptive learners: a conceptual model to guide skill acquisition in medical education. Acad Med. 2017;92:70–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bennion LD, Durning SJ, LaRochelle J, et al. Untying the Gordian knot: remediation problems in medical schools that need remediation. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Dweck CS. Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bynum WE IV, Varpio L, Lagoo J, Teunissen PW. “I’m unworthy of being in this space”: the origins of shame in medical students. Med Educ. 2021;55:185–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Splinter TA, Themmen AP. Academic dismissal policy for medical students: effect on study progress and help-seeking behaviour. Med Educ. 2011;45:987–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Caligor E, Levin ZE, Deringer E. Preparing program directors to address unprofessional behavior. In: Kalet A, Chou C, editors. Remediation in medical education: a mid-course correction. New York (NY): Springer; 2014. p. 285–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  67. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 2005;80:S84–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mak-van der Vossen MC, de la Croix A, Teherani A, van Mook WN, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. A road map for attending to medical students’ professionalism lapses. Acad Med. 2019;94:570–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Saxena V, O’Sullivan PS, Teherani A, Irby DM, Hauer KE. Remediation techniques for student performance problems after a comprehensive clinical skills assessment. Acad Med. 2009;4:669–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Winston KA, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA. The role of the teacher in remediating at-risk medical students. Med Teach. 2012;34:e732–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. O’Neill LD, Norberg K, Thomsen M, et al. Residents in difficulty—just slower learners? A case-control study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:1047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Klamen DL, Williams RG. The efficacy of a targeted remediation process for students who fail standardized patient examinations. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23:3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Chang CC, Phillips A, Rumrill SM. Developing a tutor curriculum for the Clinical Skills Tutoring Program (CSTP) at UCSF. Oral presentation. Society of General Internal Medicine, California-Hawaii regional conference; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lockspeiser TM, O’Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory. 2008;13:361–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kalet A, Zabar S. Preparing to conduct remediation. In: Kalet A, Chou CL, editors. Remediation in medical education: a mid-course correction. New York: Springer; 2014.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  76. Shearer C, Bosma M, Bergin F, Sargeant J, Warren A. Remediation in Canadian medical residency programs: established and emerging best practices. Med Teach. 2019;41:28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bearman M, Tai J, Kent F, Edouard V, Nestel D, Molloy E. What should we teach the teachers? Identifying the learning priorities of clinical supervisors. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018;23:29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Irby DM, O’Sullivan PS. Developing and rewarding teachers as educators and scholars: remarkable progress and daunting challenges. Med Educ. 2018;52:58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Neville S, French S. Clinical education: students’ and clinical tutors’ views. Physiotherapy. 1991;77:351–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bearman M, Molloy E, Ajjawi R, Keating J. ‘Is there a plan B?’: clinical educators supporting under performing students in practice settings. Teach High Educ. 2013;18:531–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Yellin PB. Learning differences and medical education. In: Kalet A, Chou CL, editors. Remediation in medical education: a mid-course correction. New York: Springer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Bierer SB, Dannefer EF, Tetzlaff JE. Time to loosen the apron strings: cohort-based evaluation of a kearner-driven remediation model at one medical school. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:1339–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dewey J. How we think. Lexington MA: D C Heath and Co; 1910.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  85. Mercer N. Words & minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Volet S, Vauras M, Salonen P. Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: an integrative perspective. Educ Psychol. 2009;44:215–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Winston KA, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA. Remediation of at-risk medical students: theory in action. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Hmelo-Silver CE, Barrows HS. Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cogn Instr. 2008;26:48–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Winston KA. Core concepts in remediation: lessons learned from a six year case study. Med Sci Educ. 2015;25:307–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Zbieranowski I, Takahashi SG, Verma S, Spadafora SM. Remediation of residents in difficulty: a retrospective 10-year review of the experience of a postgraduate board of examiners. Acad Med. 2013;88:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ. 2012;46:678–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Cox SM. ‘Forward feeding’ about students’ progress: information on struggling medical students should not be shared among clerkship directors or with students’ current teachers. Acad Med. 2008;83:801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Humphrey-Murto S, LeBlanc A, Touchie C, et al. The influence of prior performance information on ratings of current performance and implications for learner handover: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2019;94:1050–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Rinehart-Thompson LA. Amendments to FERPA regulations. JAHIMA. 2009;80:56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Graham R, Hall R, Gilmer WG. Connecting the dots: information sharing by post-secondary educational institutions under the Family Education Rights And Privacy Act (FERPA). Educ Law. 2008;20:301–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Schulze LN Jr. Balancing law student privacy interests and progressive pedagogy: dispelling the myth that FERPA prohibits cutting-edge academic support methodologies. Widener Law J. 2009;19:215.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Gold WL, McArdle P, Federman DD. Should medical school faculty see assessments of students made by previous teachers? Acad Med. 2002;77:1096–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Frellsen SL, Baker EA, Papp KK, Durning SJ. Medical school policies regarding struggling medical students during the internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2008;83:876–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Cleary L. ‘Forward feeding’ about students’ progress: the case for longitudinal, progressive, and shared assessment of medical students. Acad Med. 2008;83:800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Cohen GS, Blumberg P. Investigating whether teachers should be given assessments of students made by previous teachers. Acad Med. 1991;66:288–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Pangaro L. ‘Forward feeding’ about students’ progress: more information will enable better policy. Acad Med. 2008;83:802–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Warm EJ, Englander R, Pereira A, Barach P. Improving learner handovers in medical education. Acad Med. 2017;92:927–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Price JA. Sharing student background information with faculty: does it make a difference? Dissertation. Harvard University; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Masangkay N, Adams J, Dwinnell B, Hanson JT, Jain S, Tariq S. Revisiting feed forward: promoting a student-centered approach to education handoffs, remediation, and clerkship success. Teaching Learn Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2022.2082433.

  105. Wilkinson TJ, Tweed MJ, Egan TG, et al. Joining the dots: conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Patel RS, Tarrant C, Bonas S, Shaw RL. Medical students’ personal experience of high-stakes failure: case studies using interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Chou CL, Kalet A, Joao Costa M, Cleland J, Winston K. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8:322–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Rob Foshay for reading a prior draft of this manuscript. This chapter is a revised and updated version of a previously published paper [107].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physician Assistant Studies, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA

    Bau P. Tran

  2. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Calvin L. Chou

  3. Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Calvin L. Chou

Authors
  1. Bau P. Tran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Calvin L. Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calvin L. Chou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Institute for the Transformation of Medical Education, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

    Adina Kalet

  2. Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Calvin L. Chou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tran, B.P., Chou, C.L. (2023). Toward a Programmatic Approach for Remediation: Evidence-Based Goals for Institutions. In: Kalet, A., Chou, C.L. (eds) Remediation in Medical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32403-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32404-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation