Skip to main content

Remediation: The Measure of a Profession

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Remediation in Medical Education
  • 272 Accesses

Abstract

This opening chapter sets out a broad vision of what remediation is or might be, how it relates to health professional training and practice, and what its values are or should be. The chapter is articulated around a series of axioms: that remediation is contextual, that the boundaries and boundary practices of remediation are a reflection of its values, that remediation is a boundary practice that intersects with many other boundary practices; that remediation can feel stressful and stigmatic but not intrinsically, that remediation must be effective, proportionate, just, and fair; and that remediation is and must be understood as a part of larger systems of health professional education and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellaway RH, Chou CL, Kalet AL. Situating remediation: accommodating success and failure in medical education systems. Acad Med. 2017;93:391–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalet A, Chou CL, Ellaway RH. To fail is human: remediating remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6:418–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. ten Cate O. Trust, competence, and the supervisor’s role in postgraduate training. BMJ. 2006;333:748–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Damodaran A, Shulruf B, Jones P. Trust and risk: a model for medical education. Med Educ. 2017;51:892–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reynolds B. The passionate intellect: Dorothy L. Sayers’s encounter with Dante. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kübler-Ross E. On death and dying. New York: The MacMillan Company; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Melle E, Frank JR, Holmboe ES, Dagnone D, Stockley D, Sherbino J, International Competency-based Medical Education Collaborators. A core components framework for evaluating implementation of competency-based medical education programs. Acad Med. 2019;94:1002–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005;39:309–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 2005;80:S84–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yepes-Rios M, Dudek N, Duboyce R, Curtis J, Allard RJ, Varpio L. The failure to fail underperforming trainees in health professions education: a BEME systematic review; BEME Guide No. 42. Med Teach. 2016;38:1092–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glassick CE, Huber MR, Maeroff GI. Scholarship assessed: evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ellaway RH, Kehoe A, Illing J. Critical realism and realist inquiry in medical education. Acad Med. 2020;95:984–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ellaway RH, Topps D. METRICS: a pattern language of scholarship in medical education. MedEdPublish; 2018. p. 1305. https://www.mededpublish.org/manuscripts/1305.

  18. Fricker M. Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lingard L. Joining a conversation: the problem/gap/hook heuristic. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:252–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel H. Ellaway .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ellaway, R.H. (2023). Remediation: The Measure of a Profession. In: Kalet, A., Chou, C.L. (eds) Remediation in Medical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32403-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32404-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics