Skip to main content

Measuring Resilience in Children: From Theory to Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Resilience in Children

Abstract

The concept of resilience, like all psychological constructs, must have certain characteristics in order to be subjected to experimental testing so as to be effectively applied to benefit our constituency. A primary characteristic is that resilience must be operationally defined in a way that is reliable across time, participants, and researchers. Once a concept is operationalized in a reliable manner, then its validity can be examined. When we have sufficiently operationalized the concept of resilience, and there is evidence that it can be measured in a reliable and valid way, then application in clinical and educational settings becomes possible. This is an ideal sequence for the development of tools for testing new concepts, but it is not how many concepts and tests used in education and psychology have been promulgated. The purpose of this chapter is to first discuss issues related to the measurement of resilience in children. This is followed by a review of the test development process, including a discussion of the importance of reliability and validity. Finally, a list of tests currently available is provided to aide researchers, practitioners, and educators in the measurement and promotion of resilience.

Author Note

We write this chapter in order to provide essential information about measurement of resilience and the tools that are currently available for that purpose. It is important for the reader to recognize that the authors of this chapter are authors of several of the scales included here. In order to provide as complete a view as possible of all the scales currently available for measuring protective factors, we also included scales developed by other authors. We have, therefore, limited any evaluative comments about these scales but do provide a factual presentation of their characteristics. It is our expectation that this information will provide readers sufficient information to arrive at their own conclusions regarding the relative advantages and disadvantages of these tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Teacher report form. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S., Beck, A. T., Jolly, J. B., & Steer, R. A. (2005). Beck youth inventories (2nd ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298700500402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. E. (2001). Brown attention-deficit disorder scales for children and adolescents. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, L. A. (1981). The source of stress inventory. Psychology in the Schools, 18(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198104)18:2<164::AID-PITS2310180209>3.0.CO;2-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2020). CASEL’s SEL framework: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted? CASEL. https://casel.org/casel-sel-framework-11-2020/

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Children. (1997). Second step: A violence prevention curriculum (2nd ed.). Committee for Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Hold, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drevon, D. D. (2011). Test review [Review of the preschool behavioral and emotional rating scale, by M. H. Epstien & L. Synhorst]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(1), 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H. (2004). Behavioral and emotional rating scale, second edition: Examiner’s manual. PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., & Cullinan, D. (1998). Scale for assessing emotional disturbance. PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., & Synhorst, L. (2009). Preschool behavioral and emotional rating scale: Examiner’s manual. PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., & Hampton, V. R. (2000). Penn interactive peer play scale: A parent and teacher rating system for young children. In K. Gitlin-Weiner, A. Sandgrund, & C. Schaefer (Eds.), Play diagnosis and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 599–620). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J., Sutton-Smith, B., Coolahan, K. C., Manz, P. H., Canning, S., & Debnam, D. (1995). Assessment of preschool play interaction behaviors in young low income children: Penn interactive peer play scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(95)90028-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J., Coolahan, K., Mendez, J., McDermott, P., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1998). Contextually-relevant validation of peer play constructs with African American head start children: Penn interactive peer play scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80048-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garb, H. N. (2003). Clinical judgment and mechanical prediction. In J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Assessment Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 27–43).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., & Elliot, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system test manual. American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, V. R., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2003). The validity of the Penn interactive peer play scale with urban, low income kindergarten children. School Psychology Review, 10(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress management: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00844845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman assessment battery for children (2nd ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J., Swerrdlik, M. E., & Schneider, J. W. (2005). Review of behavioral and emotional rating scale. In R. A. Spies & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (2nd ed.). Buras Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Devereux early childhood assessment-clinical form. Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2012). Devereux early childhood assessment (DECA) for preschoolers (2nd ed.). Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., Shapiro, V. B., & Naglieri, J. A. (2009/2014). The Devereux student strengths assessment (DESSA). Aperture Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., Naglieri, J. A., & Shapiro, V. B. (2011). The Devereux student strengths assessment-second step edition (DESSA-SSE). Aperture Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., Shapiro, V. B., Robitaille, J. L., & Naglieri, J. A. (2018). The Devereux student strengths assessment high school edition (DESSA-HSE). Aperture Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBuffe, P. A., Shapiro, V. B., Robitaille, J. L., & Naglieri, J. A. (2020). The Devereux student strengths assessment high school edition student self-report (DESSA-HSE-SSR). Aperture Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., & Zelazo, L. B. (2003). Research on resilience: An integrative review. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 510–549). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mackrain, M., LeBuffe, P. A., & Powell, G. (2007). The Devereux early childhood assessment for infants and toddlers (DECA-I/T) assessment and user’s guide. Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A., & Garmezy, N. (1985). Risk, vulnerability, and protective factors in developmental psychopathology. In B. Lahey & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, K. W. (2011). Social emotional assets and resilience scales (SEARS). PAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System Interpretive Handbook. Riverside Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., LeBuffe, P. A., & Shapiro, V. B. (2011/2014). The Devereux student strengths assessment-mini (DESSA-mini). Aperture Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G., Mackrain, M., & LeBuffe, P. (2007). The Devereux early childhood assessment for infants and toddlers (DECA-I/T) technical manual. Kaplan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince-Embury, S. (2008). Resiliency scales for children & adolescents (RSCA). San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince-Embury, S. (2010). Psychometric properties of the resiliency scales for children and adolescents and use for youth with psychiatric disorders. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910366832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince-Embury, S., & Steer, R. A. (2010). Profiles of personal resiliency for normative and clinical samples of youth assessed by the resiliency scales for children and adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910366833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. (2004). Reynolds bully victimization scale. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, V. B., Robitaille, J. L., LeBuffe, P. A., & Naglieri, J. A. (2018). The Devereux student strengths assessment high school edition mini (DESSA-HSE mini). Aperture Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sink, C., & Mvududu, N. R. (2010). Review of the resiliency scales for children and adolescents. In R. A. Spies, K. F. Geisinger, & J. F. Carlson (Eds.), The eighteenth mental 1neasurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J., Bricker, D., & Twombly, E. (2015). Ages and stages questionnaires: Social-emotional (ASQ: SE-2): A parent completed, child-monitoring system for social-emotional behaviors (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied psychometrics. Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & McConnell, S. R. (1995). The Walker McConnell scale of social competence and school adjustment-adolescent version. Singular.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. M., & Severeson, H. H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders. Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. (2005). What can we learn about resilience from large-scale longitudinal studies? In S. Goldstein & R. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Parker, G. R., & Wyman, P. A. (1990). Stress resilient children in an urban setting. Journal of Primary Prevention, 11(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01324858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. O., & Masten, A. S. (2005). Resilience processes in development: Fostering positive adaptation in the context of adversity. In S. Goldstein & R. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Robitaille .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Robitaille, J.L., Naglieri, J.A. (2023). Measuring Resilience in Children: From Theory to Practice. In: Goldstein, S., Brooks, R.B. (eds) Handbook of Resilience in Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14728-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics