Skip to main content

How B-C Connection, Negotiation of F and Rationale of D Allow the Design and Implementation of a Cooperative and Effective Disputing in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process

Abstract

In Albert Ellis’ rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT; DiGiuseppe et al., A Practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014; Ellis, Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Stuart, 1962; Ellis and Grieger, Handbook of rational-emotive therapy. New York, NY: Springer, 1986), the therapist uses three specific steps of the basic ABC DEF procedure of REBT, namely the B-C connection, D rationale and negotiation of F, to formulate the patient’s problems, regulate the therapeutic process, and manage the therapeutic alliance. The negotiation of F establishes the goals of the therapy and the specific REBT contract. The B-C connection and the rationale of D help the patient to detach from his or her irrational beliefs. The healthy attitude is not to have negative thoughts but rather to tolerate them and not take seriously their demands and awfulizing aspects. This REBT attitude anticipates metacognitive procedures. It is this unceasing sharing of the rationale of the therapy that allows the REBT therapist to show empathy and respect toward the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F. E., & Kernberg, O. F. (2006). Psychotherapy of borderline personality: Focusing on object relations. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A Practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2008). Distinctive features of rational emotive behavior therapy. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1955). New approaches to psychotherapy techniques. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 11, 207–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & DiGiuseppe, R. (1993). Are inappropriate of dysfunctional feelings in rational-emotive therapy qualitative or quantitative? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. M. (Eds.). (1986). Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Maria Ruggiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruggiero, G.M., Sarracino, D., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (2021). How B-C Connection, Negotiation of F and Rationale of D Allow the Design and Implementation of a Cooperative and Effective Disputing in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics