Skip to main content

Case Formulation in Standard Cognitive Therapy: A Commentary on Chapter “Case Formulation in Standard Cognitive Therapy”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process
  • 2230 Accesses

Abstract

The commentary agrees with the premise that cognitive therapy handles the whole therapeutic process by using case formulation, including both specific cognitive strategies and the nonspecific factors such as the therapeutic alliance and the relationship. Cognitive therapists manage the developing relationship across different clients in a manner that is wholly guided by the cognitive conceptualization. Nonspecific processes are relatively secondary with less complicated clients, whereas with more complicated clients they instantiate the case formulation in terms of the “three-legged stool”: current life events, childhood antecedents, and therapeutic relationship. This instrument was introduced to deal with clients with depressions superimposed on personality disorders. These patients were more interpersonally challenging. With such clients the cognitive therapist touches on each leg of the stool with respect to any item that gets put on the agenda; how best to deal with issues in their current life (current life concerns), when did they first respond in a similar fashion in terms of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (childhood antecedents), and did the way we worked on the topic stir up any thoughts or feelings that might be of concern (therapeutic relationship).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, A. T., & Freeman, A. (1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (1st ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. (2018). Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: The IAPT Program. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14, 159–183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeRubeis, R. J., & Feeley, M. (1990). Determinants of change in cognitive therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M., DeRubeis, R. J., & Gelfand, L. A. (1999). The temporal relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 578–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, S. D., & Beck, A. T. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp. 153–203). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortion in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Hollon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hollon, S.D. (2021). Case Formulation in Standard Cognitive Therapy: A Commentary on Chapter “Case Formulation in Standard Cognitive Therapy”. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics