Skip to main content

Case Formulation in Standard Cognitive Therapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process

Abstract

Case formulation in standard cognitive therapy approaches is focused on the assessment and reformulation of negative core self-beliefs. Self-beliefs play a structural role to provide guidance, coherence, coordination, and integration to mental states. This structural component shows a psychodynamic influence and, although useful, always increases the risk of representing the standard cognitive therapeutic process as a work in which the patient is fundamentally instructed to take note of his or her cognitive distortions regarding the self. This incorrect conception—although always avoided by Beck, who unsurprisingly spoke of collaborative empiricism from the very beginning—risks emerging inadvertently by being implied in the theoretical approach that emphasizes the structural role of self-beliefs. The modern functionalist model of standard cognitive therapy assumes that such treatment is managed by sharing case formulation in order to plan a clinical intervention. Shared case formulation is included in the cognitive therapy procedure from its origins. To summarize, shared case formulation reveals a metacognitive aspect when the patient is encouraged to understand that his or her mental states derive from mental states that can be governed cognitively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1988). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1, 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1963). Thinking and depression: I. Idiosyncratic content and cognitive distortions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 324–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1964). Thinking and depression: II. Theory and therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 10, 561–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1970a). The core problem in depression: The cognitive triad. Science and Psychoanalysis, 17, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1970b). Cognitive therapy: Nature and relation to behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 1, 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1970c). Roles of fantasies in psychotherapy and psychopathology. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 150, 3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1971). Cognitive patterns in dreams and daydreams. In J. H. Masserman (Ed.), Dream dynamics (pp. 2–7). New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. London/New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2011). In London (Ed.), Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16, 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. (2015). Beyond diagnosis: Case formulation in cognitive behavioural therapy. Chichester/New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cognitive Therapy of Anxiety Disorders: Science and Practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (1999). Scientific foundations of cognitive theory and therapy of depression. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995), A cognitive model of social phobia. In R.G. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. Hope, D. e F. Scheier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 66–93). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dattilio, F. M., & Hanna, M. A. (2012). The collaborative relationship in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 146–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dattilio, F. M., & Padesky, C. A. (1990). Cognitive therapy with couples. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A Practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2001). Historical and philosophical bases of the cognitive-behavioral therapies. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (pp. 3–39). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 319–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in Psychotherapy. New York, NY: Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. M. (Eds.). (1986). Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairburn, C. G., Shafran, R., & Cooper, Z. (1999). A cognitive behavioural theory of eating disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feixas, G., & Compañ, V. (2016). Dilemma-focused intervention for unipolar depression: A treatment manual. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 235. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0947-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. (1936/1966). Ego and mechanisms of defense. In The writings of Anna Freud (Vol. 2, Rev. ed.). New York: International Universities Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, E. (2001). The Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes and the Civilized Mind. Oxford: University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F. (1987). Complexity of the Self. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F. (1991). The self in process: toward a post-rationalist cognitive therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F., & Liotti, G. (1983). Cognitive processes and emotional disorders: A structural approach to psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1964). Essays on Ego psychology. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H., Kris, E., & Loewenstein, R. M. (1946). Comments on the formation of psychic structure. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2, 11–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H., & Loewenstein, R. M. (1964). Papers on psychoanalytic psychology. Psychological issues monograph. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, S. D., & Beck, A. T. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp. 153–203). New York, NY: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kazantzis, N., Beck, J. S., Dattilio, F. M., Dobson, K. S., & Rapee, R. M. (2013). Collaborative empiricism as the central therapeutic relationship element in CBT: An expert panel discussion at the 7th International Congress of Cognitive Psychotherapy. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1978). History of behavior modification: Experimental foundations of contemporary research. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: Vol 1 and 2. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, P., & Beck, A. T. (2008). Fundamentos, modelos conceituais, aplicações e pesquisa da terapia cognitiva [Cognitive therapy: foundations, conceptual models, applications and research]. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 30, s54–s64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddux, J. E., & Kleiman, E. M. (2012). Self-efficacy. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–101). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (1974). Cognition and Behavior Modification. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (1995). Theoretical developments in the cognitive and constructive psychotherapies. In M. J. Mahoney (Ed.), Cognitive and constructive psychotherapies. Theory, research, and practice (pp. 103–120). Springer and American Psychological Association: New York, NY, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (2003). Constructive psychotherapy: A practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markland, D., Ryan, R. M., Tobin, V. J., & Rollnick, S. (2005). Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 811–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. (2012). Cognitive behaviour therapies in Britain: The historical context and present situation. In W. Dryden (Ed.), Cognitive behaviour therapies (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Sentis, K. (1982). The self in social information processing. In J. Suls (Ed.), Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self (pp. 41–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. H. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, V., & Turkat, I. D. (1979). Behavioral analysis of clinical cases. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1, 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. A. (2009). Constructivist psychotherapy. Distinctive features. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. A., & Mahoney, M. J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in Psychotherapy. Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (1977). The conditioning theory of fear acquisition: a critical examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 375–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (2015). The evolution of behaviour therapy and cognitive behaviour therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 64, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R. I. (2014a). Aaron T. Beck’s drawings and the psychoanalytic origin story of cognitive therapy. History of Psychology, 15, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, R. I. (2014b). The “Splendid Isolation” of Aaron T. Beck. Isis, 105, 734–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, A. J., Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., & Hollon, S. (1977). Comparative efficacy of cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(1), 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: a cognitive behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D. J., Kupfer, D. J., & Schatzberg, A. F. (Eds.). (2006). The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of mood disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee, J., & Kazantzis, N. (2011). Collaborative empiricism in cognitive therapy: A definition and theory for the relationship construct. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Mathews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove/Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G. (1996). Depression and the specificity of autobiographical memory. In D. Rubin (Ed.), Remembering Our Past: Studies in Autobiographical Memory (pp. 244–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. A., & Viney, L. L. (Eds.). (2005). Personal construct psychotherapy. Advances in theory, practice and research. London: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Maria Ruggiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (2021). Case Formulation in Standard Cognitive Therapy. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics