Skip to main content

The Case Formulation in the Post-Rationalist Constructivist Model: Commentary on Chapter “Strengths and Limitations of Case Formulation in Constructivist Cognitive Behavioral Therapies”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process
  • 2186 Accesses

Abstract

The core of radical post-rationalist constructivism is the exploration of the self and of its identity and continuity processes. The model has a vision of the individual as an autonomous complex system builder of meanings, generating a feeling of continuity and unity central to the maintenance of a stable identity. The structure of the identity is the organization of personal meaning (OPS), that is, the emergence of an organizing process expressed by the primeval emotional core and the creation of a personological structure in which each element is related to all the others. An emotional disorder represents the attempt to maintain this feeling of continuity and unity of identity. Case formulation in post-rationalist constructivism is the result of a complex process of identification of the patient’s OPS that occurs through assessing, underlining and construing in their complexity those primarily emotional elements that are at the basis of the feeling of unity and continuity of identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, L. A., Wolin, S. J., & McAwity, K. J. (1988). Family identity, ritual and myth: A cultural perspective on life cycle transitions. In C. J. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions: Continuity and change over the life cycle (pp. 211–234). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercelli, F., & Lenzi, S. (1999). Riascoltando una seduta [Listening again to a session]. Quaderni di Psicoterapia, 4, 42–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachement and loss (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachement and loss (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachement and loss (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, P. M., & Landini, A. (2011). Assessing adult attachment: A dynamic-maturational approach to discourse analysis. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damiano, L. (2009). Unità in dialogo [Unity in dialogue]. Milano: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodet, M. (1999). Coherence Individuelle, Reciprocite Emotionelle et Intimite: pour une Approche Post-Rationaliste des Relations de Couple [Individual coherence, emotional reciprocity and intimacy: For a post-rationalist approach to couple relations]. Revue Francophone de Clinique Comportementale et Cognitive, IV(3), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodet, M. (2002). El cambio posible: un caso clinico: el Hombre de la barca [The possible change: A clinical case: The man of the boat]. Revista de Psicoterapia, 13(50/51), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodet, M. (2003). L’intervento clinico sulla reciprocità di coppia [The clinical intervention on couple reciprocity]. In F. Lambruschi (Ed.), Psicoterapia dell’età evolutiva. Procedure di assessment e strategie psicoterapeutiche [Developmental psychotherapy. Assessment procedures and psychotherapeutic strategies] (pp. 280–308). Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodet, M. (2010). Self meaning e tema di vita. Una proposta cognitivo-costruttivista [Self meaning and life theme: A cognitive constructivist proposal]. In A. Pacciolla & F. Mancini (Eds.), Cognitivismo esistenziale. Dal significato del sintomo al significato della vita [Existential cognitivism. From the meaning of the symptom to the meaning of life]. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodet, M., & Merigliano, D. (2001a). La moviola [slow motion]. In S. Borgo, G. della Giusta, & L. Sibilia (Eds.), Dizionario di psicoterapia cognitivo–comportamentale [Dictionary of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy] (pp. 177–178). Milano: Mc Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodet, M., & Merigliano, D. (2001b). Narratività [Narrativity]. In S. Borgo, G. della Giusta, & L. Sibilia (Eds.), Dizionario di psicoterapia cognitivo–comportamentale [Dictionary of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy] (pp. 181–182). Milano: Mc Graw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodet, M., & Merigliano, D. (2009). Organizaciones de significado y personal y trastornos de personalidad: una propuesta constructivista [Organizations of personal meaning and personality disorders: A constructivist proposal]. Revista de Psicoterapia, 19(74/75), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 679–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F. (1985). A constructivistic foundation for cognitive therapy. In M. J. Mahoney & A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognition and psychotherapy (pp. 101–142). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F. (1987). Complexity of the self. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F. (1991). The self in process: Toward a post-rationalist cognitive therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F. (1996–1999). Psychotherapy training lectures. Unissued manuscripts. Roma: Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F., & Dodet, M. (1993). Terapia Cognitiva Sistemico-Processuale della Coppia [Systemic-process cognitive therapy of the couple]. Psicobiettivo, 13, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F., & Liotti, G. (1983). Cognitive processes and emotional disorders: A structural approach to psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1995). Shame: The exposed self. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1997). Altering fate: Why the past does not predict the future. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liotti, G., & Farina, B. (2011). Sviluppi traumatici [Traumatic developments]. Milano: Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liotti, G., & Monticelli, F. (2014). Teoria e clinica dell’alleanza terapeutica. Una prospettiva cognitivo-evoluzionista [Theory and clinic of the therapeutic alliance. A cognitive-evolutionary perspective]. Milano: Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (1995). Human change processes: The scientific foundations of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (2003). Constructive psychotherapy: A practical guide. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Boston, MA: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1984). The tree of knowledge. Biological basis of human understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merigliano, D. (1998). Trame narrative nella costruzione del Sé [Narrative plots in the construction of the self]. Psicobiettivo, 1, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merigliano, D. (Ed.). (2019). La psicoterapia postrazionalista. Casi clinici, metodi di intervento e aspetti applicative [Postrationalist psychotherapy. Clinical cases, intervention methods and application aspects]. Roma: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (1977). La Méthode [The method]. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe [Introduction to complex thinking]. Paris: ESF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe [Introduction to complex thinking] (2nd ed.). Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. (2001). Processi psichici e psicopatologia nell’approccio cognitivo [Psychic processes and psychopathology in the cognitive approach]. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. (2007). CostruirSi. Sviluppo e adattamento del Sé nella normalità e nella patologia [Building ourselves. Development and adaptation of the self in normality and pathology]. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiñones, A. T. (2000). Organizaciòn de significado personal: una estructura hermenèutica global [Organizations of personal meaning: A hermeneutic global structure]. Revista de Psicoterapia, 41, 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiñones, A. T., & Guidano, V. F. (Eds.). (2001). El modelo cognitivo postracionalista [The cognitive post-rationalist model]. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reda, M. A. (1986). Sistemi Cognitivi Complessi e Psicoterapia [Cognitive complex systems and psychotherapy]. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semerari, A., Colle, L., Pellecchia, G., Buccione, I., Carcione, A., Dimaggio, G., et al. (2014). Metacognitive dysfunctions in personality disorders: Correlations with disorder severity and personality styles. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 751–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tronik, E. (2011). Multilevel meaning making and dyadic expansion of consciousness: The emotional and polymorphic polysemic flow of meaning. In D. Fosha, D. J. Siegel, & M. F. Solomon (Eds.), The healing power of emotion: Affective neuroscience, development & clinical practice (pp. 86–111). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dodet, M. (2021). The Case Formulation in the Post-Rationalist Constructivist Model: Commentary on Chapter “Strengths and Limitations of Case Formulation in Constructivist Cognitive Behavioral Therapies”. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics