Skip to main content

Commentary on the Presentation of the Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy Model in Chapter “Strengths and Limitations of Case Formulation in Constructivist Cognitive Behavioral Therapies”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process

Abstract

MIT is a treatment specific to relatively difficult patients with complex personality and psychotic disorders. Owing to their relational difficulties, these patients can activate problematic interpersonal cycles during treatment, in which the therapist is involved. In turn, relational difficulties are related to reduced metacognitive skills. MIT aims to both manage the therapeutic relationship and encourage the development of metacognitive skills. The MIT treatment both includes the conscious use of the case formulation in order to promote metacognition and emphasizes the importance of relational experiences in sessions that are aimed at regulating the emotional tone of the session, to promote its recall and to manage moments of crisis in the alliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, F. (1950). Analysis of the therapeutic factors in psychoanalytic treatment. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 19, 482–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F. G., & French, T. M. (1946). Psychoanalytic therapy: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bilotta, E., Carcione, A., Fera, T., Moroni, F., Nicolò, G., Pedone, R., Pellecchia, G., Semerari, A., & Colle, L. (2018). Symptom severity and mindreading in narcissistic personality disorder. PLoS One, 13(8), 216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcione, A., Nicolò, G., & Semerari, A. (2016). Curare i casi complessi: la terapia metacognitiva interpersonale dei disturbi di personalità [Treating complex cases: Metacognitive interpersonal therapy of personality disorders]. Bari: Gius. Laterza & Figli Spa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcione, A., Riccardi, I., Bilotta, E., Leone, L., Pedone, R., Conti, L., Colle, L., Fiore, D., Nicolò, G., Pellecchia, G., Procacci, M., & Semerari, A. (2019). Metacognition as a predictor of improvements in personality disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carcione, A., & Semerari, A. (2019). I cicli interpersonali problematici nei disturbi di personalità [The problematic interpersonal cycles in personality disorders]. Quaderni di Psicoterapia Cognitiva, 45. https://doi.org/10.3280/qpcoa.v0i45.8988.g531.

  • Dimaggio, G., Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Nicolo, G., & Procacci, M. (2007). Psychotherapy of personality disorders: Metacognition, states of mind, and interpersonal cycles. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939536.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, G., Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Procacci, M., & Nicolo, G. (2006). Toward a model of self pathology underlying personality disorders: Narratives, metacognition, interpersonal cycles and decision-making processes. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 597–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monticelli, F., Imperatori, C., Carcione, A., Pedone, R., & Farina, B. (2018). Cooperation in psychotherapy increases metacognitive abilities: A single-case study. Rivista di Psichiatria, 53, 336–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semerari, A. (1999). Psicoterapia cognitiva del paziente grave. Metacognizione e relazione terapeutica [Cognitive psychotherapy of severe patient. Metacognition and therapeutic relationship]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Dimaggio, G., Nicolò, G., & Procacci, M. (2007). Understanding minds: Different functions and different disorders? The contribution of psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semerari, A., Colle, L., Pellecchia, G., Buccione, I., Carcione, A., Dimaggio, G., et al. (2014). Metacognitive dysfunctions in personality disorders: Correlations with disorder severity and personality styles. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 751–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Semerari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carcione, A., Semerari, A. (2021). Commentary on the Presentation of the Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy Model in Chapter “Strengths and Limitations of Case Formulation in Constructivist Cognitive Behavioral Therapies”. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics