Abstract
This Commentary describes the framework of Process-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (PB-CBT). PB-CBT works under the assumption that the symptom is maintained and is also maintaining a network that is maladaptive and resilient for change; PB-CBT aims to help the client replace a maladaptive network with an adaptive one, to strengthen processes that promote well-being and experiences that goes in line with the clients’ values and ambitions. Treatment starts with a collaborative contextual idiographic assessment in which both client and therapist, using their unique personal or professional knowledge, examine a particular context to formulate a shared understanding of the process occurring in that context and to identify targets for intervention. The assessment builds-up toward a functional analysis, conceived as the identification of relevant and controllable functional relations to an individual’s specific behaviors. In PB-CBT case formulation continues as long as treatment is still ongoing. Receiving and discussing the client’s feedback on the intervention is essential in order to decide whether to adapt or change the intervention and conduct it again. Asking individualized, context related questions, using advanced tools for data collection and analysis, organizing the data in a comprehensive working model, and working in a cyclic manner throughout the therapeutic process, are indeed a new way in which case formulation can be delivered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barthel, A. L., Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2020). Process-based therapy (PBT): An integrative approach to clinical treatment and research via idiographic methodology. Procognitive (Cognitive Therapy Update Program). Unissued manuscript.
Ghaderi, A. (2006). Does individualization matter? A randomized trial of standardized (focused) versus individualized (broad) cognitive behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 273–288.
Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., & Maskrey, N. (2014). Evidence based medicine: A movement in crisis? BMJ, 348, g3725. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725.
Guidano, V. F. (1993). A constructivist outline of human knowing processes. In M. Mahoney (Ed.), Cognitive and constructive psychotherapies: theory, research and practice (pp. 89–102). New York, NY: Springer.
Hayes, S. C. (2016). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies- Republished article. Behavior Therapy, 47, 869–885.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Hayes, S. C., & Follette, W. C. (1992). Can functional analysis provide a substitute for syndromal classification? Behavioral Assessment, 14, 345–365.
Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., Stanton, C. E., Carpenter, J. K., Sanford, B. T., Curtiss, J. E., & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 117, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.005.
Haynes, S. N., & O’Brien, W. H. (1990). Functional analysis in behavior therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 649–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(90)90074-K.
Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618772296.
Hurl, K., Wightman, J., Haynes, S. N., & Virues-Ortega, J. (2016). Does a pre-intervention functional assessment increase intervention effectiveness? A meta-analysis of within-subject interrupted time-series studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 71–84.
Miller, F. G., & Lee, D. L. (2013). Do functional behavioral assessments improve intervention effectiveness for students diagnosed with ADHD? A single-subject meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 253–282.
Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. New York, NY: Guilford.
Persons, J. B., Beckner, V. L., & Tompkins, M. A. (2013). Testing case formulation hypotheses in psychotherapy: Two case examples. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 20, 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2013.03.004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Snir, A., Hofmann, S. (2021). Commentary on Chapter “Case Formulation in Process-Based Therapies”: Process Based CBT as an Approach to Case Conceptualization. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63586-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63587-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)