Abstract
Third wave cognitive psychotherapy process models suggest that emotional disorders do not depend on biased mental representations, but rather on the dysfunctional interaction between voluntary and regulatory processes and emotionally charged, automatic associative processes. From a clinical viewpoint, while traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based treatments have focused on change, third wave process approaches recommend flexibility in balancing acceptance and change. Among process approaches, the chapter explores in details the use of case formulation in acceptance and commitment therapy, process-based CBT, schema therapy and metacognitive therapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arntz, A., & van Genderen, H. (2009). Schema therapy for borderline personality disorder. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Bamelis, L. L., Evers, S. M., Spinhoven, P., & Arntz, A. (2014). Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 305–322.
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). London/New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Bell, T., Mackie, L., & Bennett-Levy, J. (2015). ‘Venturing towards the dark side’: The use of imagery interventions by recently qualified cognitive–behavioural therapists. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 22, 591–603.
Cannon, W. B. (1915). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Company.
Cannon, W. B. (1936). The role of emotions in disease. Annals of Internal Medicine, 9, 1453–1465.
Carlbring, P., Maurin, L., Törngren, C., Linna, E., Eriksson, T., Sparthan, E., et al. (2010). Individually-tailored, Internet-based treatment for anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 18–24.
Christensen, A., Jacobson, N. S., & Babcock, J. C. (1995). Integrative behavioral couples therapy. In N. S. Jacobson & A. S. Gurman (Eds.), Clinical handbook for couples therapy (pp. 31–64). New York: Guildford.
Cordova, J. V. (2001). Acceptance in behavior therapy: Understanding the process of change. Behavior Analyst, 24, 213–226.
De Houwer, J. (2011). Why the cognitive approach in psychology would profit from a functional approach and vice versa. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 202–209.
DiGiuseppe, R., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Doss, B. D., Jones, J. T., & Christensen, A. (2002). Integrative behavioral couples therapy. In F. W. Kaslow (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy: Integrative/eclectic (Vol. 4, pp. 387–410). John Wiley & Sons Inc..
Hackmann, A., Bennett-Levy, J., & Holmes, E. A. (2011). Oxford guide to imagery in cognitive therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Process-based CBT. The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland, CA: Context Press, New Harbinger.
Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., Plumb-Vilardaga, J., Villatte, J. L., & Pistorello, J. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: Examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behavior therapy, 44, 180–198.
Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (2004). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., & Perugini, M. (2016). The functional-cognitive framework for psychological research: Controversies and resolutions. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 4–14.
Jacob, G. A., & Arntz, A. (2013). Schema therapy for personality disorders—A review. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 171–185.
Jacobson, N. S., Martell, C. R., & Dimidjian, S. (2001). Behavioral Activation for depression: Returning to contextual roots. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 255–270.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49–81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kanter, J. W., Bush, A. M., & Rush, L. C. (2009). Behavioral activation. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kohlenberg, R. J., & Tsai, M. (1991). Functional analytic psychotherapy: Creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Kuyken, W. (2006). Evidence-based case formulation: Is the emperor clothed? In N. Tarrier (Ed.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy. The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 28–51). Hove/New York, NY: Routledge.
Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2011). Collaborative case conceptualization: Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy. New York, NY: Guilford.
Leahy, R. L. (2015). Emotional schema therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Martell, C. R., Addis, M. E., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Depression in context: Strategies for guided action. New York, NY: Norton.
Martin, J. W., & Sloman, S. A. (2013). Refining the dual-system theory of choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 552–555.
Mathews, G., & Wells, A. (1999). The cognitive science of attention and emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Wiley.
Mathews, G., & Wells, A. (2004). Rumination, depression, and metacognition: The S-REF model. In C. Papageorgiou & A. Wells (Eds.), Rumination: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 125–151). Chichester: Wiley.
McCullough, J. P., Jr., & Goldfried, M. R. (1999). Treatment for chronic depression: Cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy (guides to individualized evidence-based treatment). New York, NY: Guilford.
Roediger, E., Stevens, B. A., & Brockman, R. (2008). Contextual schema therapy: An integrative approach to personality disorders, emotional dysregulation & interpersonal functioning. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Pub.
Segerstrom, S. C., Stanton, A. L., Alden, L. E., & Shortridge, B. E. (2003). Multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: What’s on your mind, and how, and how much? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 909–921.
Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 379–396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 421–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. London: Guilford Press.
Wells, A. (2013). Advances in metacognitive therapy. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 186–201.
Wells, A., & Mathews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove/Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, G., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester: John Wiley.
Wilson, K. G., & Dufrene, T. (2009). Mindfulness for two: An acceptance and commitment therapy approach to mindfulness in psychotherapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Guilford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Bassanini, A., Sassaroli, S. (2021). Case Formulation in Process-Based Therapies. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63586-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63587-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)