Skip to main content

Case Formulation in Process-Based Therapies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process

Abstract

Third wave cognitive psychotherapy process models suggest that emotional disorders do not depend on biased mental representations, but rather on the dysfunctional interaction between voluntary and regulatory processes and emotionally charged, automatic associative processes. From a clinical viewpoint, while traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based treatments have focused on change, third wave process approaches recommend flexibility in balancing acceptance and change. Among process approaches, the chapter explores in details the use of case formulation in acceptance and commitment therapy, process-based CBT, schema therapy and metacognitive therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arntz, A., & van Genderen, H. (2009). Schema therapy for borderline personality disorder. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamelis, L. L., Evers, S. M., Spinhoven, P., & Arntz, A. (2014). Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 305–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). London/New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, T., Mackie, L., & Bennett-Levy, J. (2015). ‘Venturing towards the dark side’: The use of imagery interventions by recently qualified cognitive–behavioural therapists. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 22, 591–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1915). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1936). The role of emotions in disease. Annals of Internal Medicine, 9, 1453–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlbring, P., Maurin, L., Törngren, C., Linna, E., Eriksson, T., Sparthan, E., et al. (2010). Individually-tailored, Internet-based treatment for anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A., Jacobson, N. S., & Babcock, J. C. (1995). Integrative behavioral couples therapy. In N. S. Jacobson & A. S. Gurman (Eds.), Clinical handbook for couples therapy (pp. 31–64). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordova, J. V. (2001). Acceptance in behavior therapy: Understanding the process of change. Behavior Analyst, 24, 213–226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J. (2011). Why the cognitive approach in psychology would profit from a functional approach and vice versa. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 202–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doss, B. D., Jones, J. T., & Christensen, A. (2002). Integrative behavioral couples therapy. In F. W. Kaslow (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy: Integrative/eclectic (Vol. 4, pp. 387–410). John Wiley & Sons Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackmann, A., Bennett-Levy, J., & Holmes, E. A. (2011). Oxford guide to imagery in cognitive therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). Process-based CBT. The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland, CA: Context Press, New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., Plumb-Vilardaga, J., Villatte, J. L., & Pistorello, J. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: Examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behavior therapy, 44, 180–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (2004). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., & Perugini, M. (2016). The functional-cognitive framework for psychological research: Controversies and resolutions. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 4–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, G. A., & Arntz, A. (2013). Schema therapy for personality disorders—A review. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Martell, C. R., & Dimidjian, S. (2001). Behavioral Activation for depression: Returning to contextual roots. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49–81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, J. W., Bush, A. M., & Rush, L. C. (2009). Behavioral activation. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlenberg, R. J., & Tsai, M. (1991). Functional analytic psychotherapy: Creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyken, W. (2006). Evidence-based case formulation: Is the emperor clothed? In N. Tarrier (Ed.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy. The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 28–51). Hove/New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2011). Collaborative case conceptualization: Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, R. L. (2015). Emotional schema therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell, C. R., Addis, M. E., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Depression in context: Strategies for guided action. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. W., & Sloman, S. A. (2013). Refining the dual-system theory of choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 552–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, G., & Wells, A. (1999). The cognitive science of attention and emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, G., & Wells, A. (2004). Rumination, depression, and metacognition: The S-REF model. In C. Papageorgiou & A. Wells (Eds.), Rumination: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 125–151). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, J. P., Jr., & Goldfried, M. R. (1999). Treatment for chronic depression: Cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy (guides to individualized evidence-based treatment). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, E., Stevens, B. A., & Brockman, R. (2008). Contextual schema therapy: An integrative approach to personality disorders, emotional dysregulation & interpersonal functioning. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, S. C., Stanton, A. L., Alden, L. E., & Shortridge, B. E. (2003). Multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: What’s on your mind, and how, and how much? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 909–921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 379–396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 421–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (2013). Advances in metacognitive therapy. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Mathews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove/Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, G., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. G., & Dufrene, T. (2009). Mindfulness for two: An acceptance and commitment therapy approach to mindfulness in psychotherapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Maria Ruggiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Bassanini, A., Sassaroli, S. (2021). Case Formulation in Process-Based Therapies. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics