Skip to main content

Shared Case Formulation as the Main Therapeutic Process in Cognitive Therapies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process

Abstract

This first chapter introduces the core assumption discussed in the book: sharing case formulation is the initial move and main operational tool of a significant number of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches. This aspect is increasingly becoming the hallmark of many of these approaches because it is in line with the CBT principle of clinical change: The assumption that conscious cognition is the cardinal mediator of emotional suffering and the main target of therapeutic intervention. Another core assumption of the book is that the process of shared case formulation procedures in CBT approaches allows the therapist to manage both CBT-specific and non-specific features of the therapeutic process. Last, the book explores similarities and differences in the use of case formulation between CBT and some relational and psychodynamic approaches. The case formulation in these non-CBT models is not completely shared from the beginning of treatment, being rather the final result of an explorative path and an outcome of the therapeutic process. This first chapter explains the plan of the book, showing how some chapters concern case formulation in either CBT or non-CBT therapeutic orientations while other chapters, written by experts in specific therapeutic orientations, are critical comments of the core assumptions of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arntz, A., & van Genderen, H. (2009). Schema therapy for borderline personality disorder. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asay, T. P., & Lambert, M. J. (1999). The empirical case for the common factors in therapy. In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 23–55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bara, B. (2018). Il terapeuta relazionale [The relational therapist]. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1963). Thinking and depression: I. Idiosyncratic content and cognitive distortions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 324–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1964). Thinking and depression: II. Theory and therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 10, 561–571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. S. (2005). Cognitive therapy for challenging problems: What to do when the basics don’t work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. (2015). Beyond diagnosis: Case formulation in cognitive behavioural therapy. Chichester/New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. H. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral case formulation. In E. Sanavio (Ed.), Behavior and cognitive therapy today: Essays in honor of Hans J. Eysenck (pp. 31–48). Kidlington, Oxford: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1973). Going beyond the information given. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspar, F. (1995). Plan analysis: Toward optimizing psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspar, F. (2007). Plan analysis. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (pp. 251–289). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: Science and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchfield, K. L., Panizo, M. T., & Benjamin, L. S. (2019). Formulating key psychosocial mechanisms of psychopathology and change in interpersonal reconstructive therapy. In U. Kramer (Ed.), Case formulation for personality disorders (pp. 181–201). London: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, R., Doyle, K. A., Dryden, W., & Backx, W. (2014). A Practioner’s guide to rational emotive behavior therapy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, G., Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Nicolò, G., & Procacci, M. (2007). Psychotherapy of personality disorders: Metacognition, states of mind and interpersonal cycles. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. A. (2001). Historical and philosophical bases of the cognitive-behavioral therapies. In K. S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (pp. 3–39). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T. D. (2007). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T. D. (2011). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, T. D. (2015). Psychotherapy case formulation. Arlington, VA: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A., & Grieger, R. M. (Eds.). (1986). Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassbinder, E., Brand-de Wilde, O., & Arntz, A. (2019). Case formulation in schema therapy: Working with the mode model. In U. Kramer (Ed.), Case formulation for personality disorders (pp. 77–94). London: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feixas, G., & Compañ, V. (2016). Dilemma-focused intervention for unipolar depression: A treatment manual. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 235. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0947-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O. (2017). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A basic text. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Pub.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F. (1991). The self in process: toward a post-rationalist cognitive therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano, V. F., & Liotti, G. (1983). Cognitive processes and emotional disorders: A structural approach to psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Hofman, S. G. (2018). Process-based CBT. The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy. Oakland, CA: Context Press, New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (2004). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. H., & Saslow, G. (1969). Behavioural diagnosis. In C. M. Franks (Ed.), Behaviour therapy: Appraisal and status. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: Vol 1 and 2. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyken, W. (2006). Evidence-based case formulation: Is the emperor clothed? In N. Tarrier (Ed.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy. The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 28–51). Hove/New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, A. A. (1960). The elimination of children’s phobias by deconditioning. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), Behaviour therapy and the neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, A. A. (1976). Multimodal behavior therapy. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liotti, G., & Monticelli, F. (2014). Teoria e clinica dell’alleanza terapeutica. Una prospettiva cognitivo-evoluzionista [Therapeutic alliance theory and clinic. A cognitive-evolutionary perspective]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (2003). Constructive psychotherapy: A practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, G., & Wells, A. (1999). The cognitive science of attention and emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, N. (1999). Psychoanalytic case formulation. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, V. (1957). The treatment of two phobic patients on the basis of learning principles. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55(2), 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, V., & Turkat, I. D. (1979). Behavioral analysis of clinical cases. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1(4), 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A., & Aron, L. E. (1999). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. A. (2009). Constructivist psychotherapy. Distinctive features. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. A., & Mahoney, M. J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in Psychotherapy. Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. C., Knoll, M., & Tran, V. (2019). Motives, defences, and conflicts in the dynamic formulation for psychodynamic psychotherapy using the idiographic conflict formulation method. In U. Kramer (Ed.), Case formulation for personality disorders (pp. 203–224). London: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B., & Tomkins. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral case formulation. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (pp. 290–316). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassaroli, S., Caselli, G., Bassanini, & Ruggiero, G. M. (2017a). Procedure e protocollo di terapia LIBET seconda parte: fasi del protocollo e caso clinico Antonia A [LIBET therapy procedures and protocol second part: protocol phases and clinical case Antonia A]. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 32, 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassaroli, S., Caselli, G., Redaelli, C., & Ruggiero, G. M. (2017b). Procedure e protocollo di terapia LIBET – prima parte: le procedure ABC-LIBET, laddering e disputing [LIBET therapy procedures and protocol first part: ABC-LIBET procedures, laddering, and disputing]. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 23, 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semerari, A., Colle, L., Pellecchia, G., Buccione, I., Dimaggio, G., Nicolò, G., Procacci, M., & Pedone, R. (2014). Metacognitive dysfunctions in personality disorders: correlations with disorder severity and personality styles. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 751–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. B. (1955). Training of clinical psychologists at the institute of psychiatry. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 8, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. B. (1957). Experimental methods in the psychological description of the individual psychiatric patient. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 111, 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberschatz, G. (Ed.). (2013). Transformative relationships: The control mastery theory of psychotherapy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturmey, P. (2008). Behavioral case formulation and intervention: A functional analytic approach (Vol. 89). Chichester/New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturmey, P. (Ed.). (2009). Clinical case formulation: Varieties of approaches. Chichester/New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkat, I. D. (1985). Behavioural case formulation. New York, NY: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turkat, I. D. (1986). The behavioural interview. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of behavioural assessment (2nd ed.). Chichester/New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weerasekera, P. (1996). Multiperspective case formulation: A step towards treatment integration. Florida, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (2008). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Mathews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove/Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. A., & Viney, L. L. (Eds.). (2005). Personal construct psychotherapy. Advances in theory, practice and research. London: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, J. (1954). Reciprocal inhibition as the main basis of psychotherapeutic effects. AMA Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 72, 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A. J. (1958). The application of learning theory to the treatment of tics. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Maria Ruggiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (2021). Shared Case Formulation as the Main Therapeutic Process in Cognitive Therapies. In: Ruggiero, G.M., Caselli, G., Sassaroli, S. (eds) CBT Case Formulation as Therapeutic Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63587-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics