Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Varieties of Disengagement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Experimental Psychology and Human Agency

Abstract

Researchers use the term “mind wandering” (MW) when referring to covert disengagement from task performance. Characterizing MW in terms of an antagonistic relation to task sustains the impression that MW consists of a single set of processes, associated with a common set of principles, causes, and consequences. On one hand, the idea that MW refers to a single set of processes is disconfirmed by evidence. On the other hand, the antagonistic relation with task performance continues to re-unify MW and maintains a set of associated connotations. The idea of MW as a unitary concept is also tacitly preserved when associating it with other phenomena, such as creativity. It is possible to approach the phenomena that are gathered under the umbrella of MW in their own right, instead of approaching them in terms of one type of (antagonistic) relation to task performance. Doing so, however, would diminish the unity and glamour of the elusive construct of MW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrobus, J. S., Singer, J. L., Goldstein, S., & Fortgang, M. (1970). Mind wandering and cognitive structure. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 32, 242–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, L. (2002). The imp of the mind: Exploring the silent epidemic of obsessive bad thoughts. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23, 1117–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, E., Riby, L. M., Greer, J., & Smallwood, J. (2011). Absorbed in thought: The effect of mind wandering on the processing of relevant and irrelevant events. Psychological Science, 22, 596–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilalić, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition, 108(3), 652–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bocanegra, B. R. (2017). Troubling anomalies and exciting conjectures: A bipolar model of scientific discovery. Emotion Review, 9, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocanegra, B. R. (2018). How emotion-cognition interactions drive affective bipolarity. Archives of Psychology, 2(5), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callard, F., Smallwood, J., Golchert, J., & Margulies, D. S. (2013). The era of the wandering mind? Twenty-first century research on self-generated mental activity. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Callard, F., Smallwood, J., & Margulies, D. S. (2012). Default positions: How neuroscience’s historical legacy has hampered investigation of the resting mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Caspar, E. A., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2018). Only giving orders? An experimental study of the sense of agency when giving or receiving commands. PLoS One, 13(9), e0204027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115, 458–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne, J. A., Carriere, J. S., & Smilek, D. (2006). Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 578–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8719–8724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, K., Mills, C., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Irving, Z. C., Thompson, E., Fox, K. C., & Kam, J. W. (2018). Mind-wandering as a scientific concept: Cutting through the definitional haze. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(11), 957–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysikou, E. G. (2006). When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem solving performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 935–942.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demanet, J., Muhle-Karbe, P. S., Lynn, M. T., Blotenberg, I., & Brass, M. (2013). Power to the will: How exerting physical effort boosts the sense of agency. Cognition, 129(3), 574–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, G. (2012). Mechanisms of cognitive control: The functional role of task rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, G., & Fröber, K. (2019). On how to be flexible (or not): Modulation of the stability-flexibility balance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eitam, B., Shoval, R., & Yeshurun, Y. (2015). Seeing without knowing: Task relevance dissociates between visual awareness and recognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339, 125–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eitam, B., Yeshurun, Y., & Hassan, K. (2013). Blinded by irrelevance: Pure irrelevance induced “blindness”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 611–615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelsted, N. (2017). Catching up with Aristotle: A journey in quest of general psychology. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2009). Harnessing the wandering mind: The role of perceptual load. Cognition, 111(3), 345–355.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2018) The limits of language as the limits of psychological explanation. Theory & Psychology, 28(6), 697–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goschke, T. (2013). Volition in action: Intentions, control dilemmas and the dynamic regulation of intentional control. In W. Prinz, A. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 409–434). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozli, D. G. (2017). Behaviour versus performance: The veiled commitment of experimental psychology. Theory & Psychology, 27(6), 741–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozli, D. G., & Dolcini, N. (2018). Reaching into the unknown: Actions, goal hierarchies, and explorative agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., Lazer, D., Redish, A. D., Couzin, I. D., & Cognitive Search Research Group. (2015). Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 46–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2015). Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 2, pp. 33–67). New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongkees, B. J., & Colzato, L. S. (2016). Spontaneous eye blink rate as predictor of dopamine-related cognitive function—A review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 58–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Gross, G. M., Chun, C. A., Smeekens, B. A., Meier, M. E., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2017). For whom the mind wanders, and when, varies across laboratory and daily-life settings. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1271–1289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932–932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kounios, J., Fleck, J. I., Green, D. L., Payne, L., Stevenson, J. L., Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2008). The origins of insight in resting-state brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 46, 281–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kounios, J., Frymiare, J. L., Bowden, E. M., Fleck, J. I., Subramaniam, K., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2006). The prepared mind: Neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight. Psychological Science, 17, 882–890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., & Srinivasan, N. (2014). Naturalizing sense of agency with a hierarchical event-control approach. PLoS One, 9, e92431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. H., Tseng, C. Y., Tsai, A. C. H., Huang, A. C. W., & Lin, W. L. (2016). Different brain wave patterns and cortical control abilities in relation to different creative potentials. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. G., Akinola, M., & Mason, M. F. (2017). “Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315(5810), 393–395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minohara, R., Wen, W., Hamasaki, S., Maeda, T., Kato, M., Yamakawa, H., … Asama, H. (2016). Strength of intentional effort enhances the sense of agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: A review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 11–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J. (1998). The private theater: A phenomenological investigation of daydreaming. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 29, 116–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12, 442–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Schwarz, K. A., Foerster, A., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). The electrophysiological signature of deliberate rule violations. Psychophysiology, 53, 1870–1877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Schwarz, K., Steinhauser, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). Burdens of non-conformity: Motor execution reveals cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations. Cognition, 147, 93–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, R., Wirth, R., Weller, L., Foerster, A., & Schwarz, K. A. (2019). Taking shortcuts: Cognitive conflict during motivated rule-breaking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reedijk, S. A., Bolders, A., & Hommel, B. (2013). The impact of binaural beats on creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1300–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). ‘Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N. (2016). Explanation and the “brain sciences”. Theory & Psychology, 26(3), 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robison, M. K., Miller, A. L., & Unsworth, N. (2019). Examining the effects of probe frequency, response options, and framing within the thought-probe method. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 398–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 948–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, F. J., Smallwood, J., Engen, H., & Singer, T. (2013). How self-generated thought shapes mood—The relation between mind-wandering and mood depends on the socio-temporal content of thoughts. PLoS One, 8, e77554.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, F. J., Smallwood, J., Sackur, J., & Singer, T. (2013). Is self-generated thought a means of social problem solving? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 962.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 319–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Carriere, J. S., Levene, M., & Smilek, D. (2013). How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 430.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2012). Attention failures versus misplaced diligence: Separating attention lapses from speed–accuracy trade-offs. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 277–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering minds and wavering rhythms: Linking mind wandering and behavioral variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Jonker, T. R., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Enhancing SART validity by statistically controlling speed-accuracy trade-offs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 265.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Kane, M. J., Smallwood, J., Schacter, D. L., Maillet, D., Schooler, J. W., & Smilek, D. (2018). Mind-wandering as a natural kind: A family-resemblances view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 479–490.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Konishi, M., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2018). The role of task difficulty in theoretical accounts of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 255–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Purdon, C., & Smilek, D. (2017). Intrusive thoughts: Linking spontaneous mind wandering and OCD symptomatology. Psychological Research, 81(2), 392–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2016). On the necessity of distinguishing between unintentional and intentional mind wandering. Psychological Science, 27(5), 685–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Smilek, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 605–617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Schacter, D. L., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2017). Increasing participant motivation reduces rates of intentional and unintentional mind wandering. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0914-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Smallwood, J., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2015). On the relation of mind wandering and ADHD symptomatology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L. (1981). Daydreaming and fantasy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J. M., Baracaia, S. F., Lowe, M., & Obonsawin, M. (2003). Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 452–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Beach, E., Schooler, J. W., & Handy, T. C. (2008). Going AWOL in the brain: Mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 458–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1997). The structure of psychological common sense. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (2002). From hypothesis-testing psychology to procedure-testing psychologic. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (2016). Why psychology cannot be an empirical science. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(2), 185–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smilek, D., Carriere, J. S., & Cheyne, J. A. (2010). Out of mind, out of sight: Eye blinking as indicator and embodiment of mind wandering. Psychological Science, 21, 786–789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stawarczyk, D. (2018). Phenomenological properties of mind-wandering and daydreaming: A historical overview and functional correlates. In K. C. R. Fox & K. Christoff (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought: Mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming (pp. 193–214). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2018). Outline of theoretical psychology: Critical investigations. New York, NY: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. T., Poerio, G., Murphy, C., Bzdok, D., Jefferies, E., & Smallwood, J. (2018). Dimensions of experience: Exploring the heterogeneity of the wandering mind. Psychological Science, 29, 56–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Y. (2018). Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 642–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Y., De Lima, H. J., & van der Zee, T. (2018). Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 754–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 971–978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, W., Yamashita, A., & Asama, H. (2015). The influence of goals on sense of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemers, E. A., & Redick, T. S. (2019). The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, R., Foerster, A., Herbort, O., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (2018). This is how to be a rule breaker. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14(1), 21–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., Al-Aidroos, N., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2013). Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zmigrod, S., Colzato, L. S., & Hommel, B. (2015). Stimulating creativity: Modulation of convergent and divergent thinking by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao

    Davood Gozli

Authors
  1. Davood Gozli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gozli, D. (2019). Varieties of Disengagement. In: Experimental Psychology and Human Agency. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20422-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation