Abstract
The chapter suggests that theoretical psychology needs to move beyond the traditional alliance with philosophy and embrace the possibilities of the psychological humanities. Using examples from the humanities, their value for reflexivity and interference as well their significance in understanding the psychological are articulated. It is argued that this new vision for theoretical psychology does not mean to abandon, but to include and at the same time move beyond tradition. New ideas for the notion of subjectivity and intentionality are articulated, when critique and reconstruction is combined with construction. Reflexivity is understood as one task of metatheoretical reflexivity that is combined with diffraction. The argument for the relevance of the psychological humanities is contrasted with the social, political, public, and academic critique of the humanities, while conditions for the possibilities of the psychological humanities as an alternative program to the psychological sciences are debated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barad, K. M. (2006). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & L. L. McAlister, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1874).
Burman, E. (2006). Emotions and reflexivity in feminised education action research. Educational Action Research, 14(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790600847636
Elias, N. (1978). The civilizing process. New York: Urizen Books.
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984: Volume One (P. Rabinow, Ed. and R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: The New Press.
Frickel, S., & Gross, N. (2005). A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review, 70(2), 204–232.
Geerts, E., & van der Tuin, I. (2013). From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41(Part 3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.013
Gergen, K. J. (2001). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56(10), 808–813.
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Cole, K. R. (2014). Posthuman disability studies. Subjectivity, 7(4), 342–361.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (German original published in 1968).
Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Laying the foundations for psychology]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1982). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
Johnstone, L., & Boyle, M. with Cromby, J., Dillon, J., Harper, D., Kinderman, P., Longden, E., Pilgrim, D., & Read, J. (2018). The power threat meaning framework: Overview. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
Koch, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua “science”. American Psychologist, 36(3), 257–269.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marn, T. M. (2018). Performing the black-white biracial identity: The material, discursive, and psychological components of subject formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Slife, B. D., Reber, J. S., & Richardson, F. C. (2005). Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Teo, T. (2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000132
Teo, T. (2018a). Outline of theoretical psychology: Critical investigations. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Teo, T. (2018b). Homo neoliberalus: From personality to forms of subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318794899
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teo, T. (2019). Beyond Reflexivity in Theoretical Psychology: From Philosophy to the Psychological Humanities. In: Teo, T. (eds) Re-envisioning Theoretical Psychology. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16762-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16762-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16761-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16762-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)