Abstract
Several theoretical perspectives have influenced the study of family at various levels of abstraction. However, many demographic studies of the family in sub-Saharan Africa have not been anchored on any theoretical orientation. Given the relevance of theory in explaining why patterns and practices within a family are the way they are, this paper presents an overview of nine theoretical frameworks that are commonly used by social scientists in the study of family. The major focus, strengths and weakness of each perspective is highlighted. Advancement in understanding family dynamics in the subregion would depend heavily on the apt application of existing theories and models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albrecht, S. L., & Kunz, P. R. (1980). The decision to divorce: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Divorce, 3, 319–337.
Ali, P. A., & Naylor, P. B. (2013). Intimate partner violence: A narrative review of the feminist, social and ecological explanations for its causation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 611–619.
Allen, K. R. (1988). Integrating a feminist perspective into family studies courses. Family Relations, 37, 29–35.
Astone, N. M., Nathanson, C. A., Schoen, R., & Kim, Y. J. (1999). Family demography, social theory, and investment in social capital. Population and Development Review, 25, 1–31.
Barnes, J. C., & Beaver, K. M. (2012). Marriage and desistance from crime: A consideration of gene-environment correlation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 74, 19–33.
Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–1187.
Booth, A., Carver, K., & Granger, D. A. (2000). Biosocial perspectives on the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1018–1034.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723. Bronfenbrenner.
Bucx, F., van Wel, F., & Knijn, T. (2012). Life course status and exchanges of support between young adults and parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 74, 101–115.
Burgess, E. W., & Locke, H. J. (1945). The family: From institution to companionship. Oxford: American Book Co..
Daspit, J. J., Holt, D. T., & Chrisman, J. J. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective. Family Business Review, 29, 44–64.
Glick, P. C. (1947). The family cycle. American Sociological Review, 12, 164–174.
Grafsky, E. L. (2014). Becoming the parent of a GLB son or daughter. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 10, 36–57.
Hooper, L. M. (2007). The application of attachment theory and family systems theory to the phenomena of parentification. The Family Journal, 15, 217–223.
Lamanna, M. A., & Riedmann, A. (2003). Marriages and families – Making choices in a diverse society (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36, 211–251.
Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2018). Qian Z serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 861–878.
Litano, M. L., Major, D. A., Landers, R. N., et al. (2016). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 802–817.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2006). Does community context have important bearings on the divorce rate? A fixed-effects study of twenty Norwegian first-marriage cohorts (Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers).
Lyngstad, T. H. (2011). Does community context have an important impact on divorce risk? A fixed-effects study of twenty Norwegian first-marriage cohorts. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 27, 57–77.
Madden-Derdich, D. A., & Leonard, S. A. (2002). Shared experiences, unique realities: Formerly married mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of parenting and custody after divorce. Family Relations, 51, 37–45.
Mutran, E., & Reitzes, D. C. (1984). Intergenerational support activities and well being among the elderly: A covergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives. American Sociological Review, 49, 117–130.
Ntoimo, L. F., & Isiugo-Abanihe, U. (2013). Patriarchy and singlehood among women in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Family Issues, 35(14), 1980–2008.
Oppenheimer, V. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–591.
Roberto, K. A., Allen, K. R., & Blieszner, R. (1999). Older women, their children, and grandchildren: A feminist perspective on family relationships. Journal of Women & Aging, 11, 67–84.
Shumate, M., & Fulk, J. (2004). Boundaries and role conflict when work and family are colocated: A communication network and symbolic interaction approach. Human Relations; Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 57, 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704042714.
Simpson, R. (2003). Contemporary spinsters in the new millennium: Changing notions of family and kinship (Gender Institute New Working Paper).
Teachman, J. D., & Polonko, K. (1990). Cohabitation and marital stability in the United States. Social Forces, 69, 207–220.
Teachman, J. D., Tedrow, L. M., & Crowder, K. D. (2000). The changing demography of America’s families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1234–1246.
van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
White, J. M., Klein, D. M., & Martin, T. F. (2015). Family theories: An introduction (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Willoughby, B. J., Hall, S. S., & Luczak, H. P. (2015). Marital paradigms: A conceptual framework for marital attitudes, values and beliefs. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 188–211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ntoimo, L.F.C., Odimegwu, C.O. (2020). Theoretical Perspectives on Family Research. In: Odimegwu, C. (eds) Family Demography and Post-2015 Development Agenda in Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14887-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14887-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14886-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14887-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)